Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:59 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:23 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:26 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:54 pm
Aramore wrote:Stoke are better than their position suggests. One of the most in form teams in the league. I'm getting less and less confident as the game gets nearer.
Their shit away form comforts me though
Sun Apr 13, 2014 5:54 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:I agree that a draw would be ok, but think of it like this.
Fulham go to Spurs in the early kick off. I'd fancy Spurs, they'll want to bounce back from drawing at WBA.
Then, IF we beat Stoke then we'd go two points ahead of Fulham.
Norwich don't play until Sunday, so at 5pm on Saturday we COULD only be in the relegation zone on GD. Obviously won't happen this weekend, but we only need a seven-goal swing in GD to have a better GD to Norwich, they've got a really tough run-in too. We already have a 6-goal better GD than Fulham.
I'm starting to dream, great day at St Mary's yesterday
Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:41 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2014 6:43 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:07 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2014 7:09 pm
Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:46 am
Mon Apr 14, 2014 9:08 am
Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:16 am
Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:25 am
keepcardiffblue wrote:I don't want to be negative but we were poor on Saturday until we scored the goal,our players looked totally disinterested and I think Southampton took us for for granted due and their comfortable position in the league allowed players to relax.I believe Stoke will be a tougher game but fingers crossed we have turned a corner and Norwich have a dreadful run in.
Mon Apr 14, 2014 11:32 am
AJ1927 wrote:It was nice to see a bit of fight.
But the damage has already been done.
Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:38 pm
Tue Apr 15, 2014 12:41 pm
TomLlewellyn1927 wrote:1, the optimistic view = We need 9 points if we don't want to rely on what other teams achieve.
or
2. the more pessimistic view = we need minimum 7 points and hope other teams around us muck up.
option number 2 could well end up a number two in our face.
I know which option I am focused on.
Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:07 pm
paulh_85 wrote:TomLlewellyn1927 wrote:1, the optimistic view = We need 9 points if we don't want to rely on what other teams achieve.
or
2. the more pessimistic view = we need minimum 7 points and hope other teams around us muck up.
option number 2 could well end up a number two in our face.
I know which option I am focused on.
errr what do you mean ?
Tue Apr 15, 2014 1:33 pm
TomLlewellyn1927 wrote:paulh_85 wrote:TomLlewellyn1927 wrote:1, the optimistic view = We need 9 points if we don't want to rely on what other teams achieve.
or
2. the more pessimistic view = we need minimum 7 points and hope other teams around us muck up.
option number 2 could well end up a number two in our face.
I know which option I am focused on.
errr what do you mean ?
relying on number 2 option could mean we are clutching at straws thinking we need 7 points and we could literally end up with number 2 (shit) on our face