Tony Blue Williams wrote:SnackaJack wrote:No I didn't. There are many variations, none of which are the ones that you and Pembroke Allen seem to be claiming are common place however.
I know full well the history of the transfer and explained it. You overpaid, they snatched your hands off and then bought him back at the correct price. However you somehow think they forgot their brains and allowed you to essentially keep 60% of the players registration thus paying £3m for 40% of the player
You just are not thinking it through. You are thinking of a absolutely crazy situation and convincing yourself simply because it is favourable even in the fact of reasoning why it simply is not the case. If this was the case Tan would be buying him back for 60% discount and selling him on to the current interested parties.
It will be a % of the profit. Simple as that. Probably 200k ish.
I'm not thinking it through hmmmm what's to say there isn't a clause in the transfer deal stopping Tan from buying the player back?
We didn't buy a percentage of the registration you fool that is completely something different, we negotiated a 60% sell on clause of the transfer fee
With every reply you show yourself up as someone who is completely clueless and mistakes being intelligent with shit stirring and waffle. You have to wonder why any true Jack would register an email in his name to access a Cardiff City message board. Just on that you have no credibility at all
My word. Of course you didn't technically buy 60% of the registration. This really is like talking to the happy bus. Owning the right to 60% of any future fee is essentially Copenhagen only buying 40% of the players registration, notice the word essentially. If I buy a house for 200k (what it is worth) and the owners said "by the way, when you sell it, we want 60% of it". Unless I live in into forever, I essentially only own 40% of the deed. It isn't really a technical concept you really shouldn't be having issues with it.
Oh munch X2... no you are not thinking it through. Why would there be a clause for Tan not buying him back?
1) there doesn't need to be a clause. They can accept and refuse offers from whomever they like.
2) what difference does it make? They don't get any less of Cardiff buy or if Atalanta do. In fact Tan could say "I'll give you 100k more than Atalanta and say to Atalanta then he will sell to them for 100k less. All parties happy.
And to your last point. With every post I show myself to be incredibly patient and it is amazing I am still teaching you while remaining so calm and haven't pulled my hair out. Teachers certainly get all the respect they deserve. It is a thankless task to try and teach people who don't have a cat in hells chance of remotely grasping the subject at hand.