Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:25 pm
Plynlymonbluebird wrote:
Is that supposed to be an intellectual answer? Many people including myself witnessed Ryan Giggs playing for Wales it is a meter of historical record!
Where is such a record of your self- proclaimed succes and intellectual superiority.
Can you provide evidence? Will you provide evidence?
If you answer either with evidence I will be massively suprised.
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:29 pm
SnackaJack wrote:Plynlymonbluebird wrote:
Is that supposed to be an intellectual answer? Many people including myself witnessed Ryan Giggs playing for Wales it is a meter of historical record!
Where is such a record of your self- proclaimed succes and intellectual superiority.
Can you provide evidence? Will you provide evidence?
If you answer either with evidence I will be massively suprised.
No, it is supposed to show you that there is a variety of things I can provide proof of. But can and will are not the same. I have no reason to.
My every day life is a physical manifestation of my proclamations. If you are needing proof then that suggests you are not in witness of my physical being on a daily basis, in which case it matters little to me. For people who don't come into physical contact with me every day, I find it far more amusing to see them get worked up than provide any sort of proof they require to sooth any personal complexes they have
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:32 pm
Plynlymonbluebird wrote:
So you have no herald of your greatness like John the Baptist and you are too uch of a coward to show the light if your greatness un the heat if the Temple courtyard?
Those are metaphorical references by the way!
However, they are so apt for you!
An inadequate intellectual bully frightened to put his statements to the the true test!
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:36 pm
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:39 pm
SnackaJack wrote:Plynlymonbluebird wrote:
So you have no herald of your greatness like John the Baptist and you are too uch of a coward to show the light if your greatness un the heat if the Temple courtyard?
Those are metaphorical references by the way!
However, they are so apt for you!
An inadequate intellectual bully frightened to put his statements to the the true test!
Nothing to do with cowardice my friend. I have no reason to prove anything to anybody, especially people on an internet message board displaying frightening levels of inferiority worries. If you become a success and an intellect we may move in the same circles one day, in which you can then witness the physical manifestation of those proclamations.
A bully? are you feeling okay?
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:42 pm
Plynlymonbluebird wrote:
You proclaimed today that you frequently intellectually better posters on here. If you are bold enough to make that statement than at least have the grace to prove to those you refer to as inferiors to provide some evidence of the weight to your assertio
You are a coward.
I am not in anyway effected by your posts just find you boring and worth challenging. So far your replies have been very poor. This safety reflex of calling me inferior is witless.
Believe me young man I have no inferiority complex with regard to you.
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:44 pm
SnackaJack wrote:Plynlymonbluebird wrote:
You proclaimed today that you frequently intellectually better posters on here. If you are bold enough to make that statement than at least have the grace to prove to those you refer to as inferiors to provide some evidence of the weight to your assertio
You are a coward.
I am not in anyway effected by your posts just find you boring and worth challenging. So far your replies have been very poor. This safety reflex of calling me inferior is witless.
Believe me young man I have no inferiority complex with regard to you.
I proclaim I am a Swansea fan too, I have no interest in proving the obvious. If you disbelieve me on any aspect then that amuses me, it certainly doesn't give me the motivation to ease your clearly troubled thoughts. You are definitely affected by my posts, I dictate how long you stay here, how you respond, when you go to bed, the minutes in the day you think of me - you are certainly affected make no mistake.
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:46 pm
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:46 pm
Plynlymonbluebird wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Plynlymonbluebird wrote:
You proclaimed today that you frequently intellectually better posters on here. If you are bold enough to make that statement than at least have the grace to prove to those you refer to as inferiors to provide some evidence of the weight to your assertio
You are a coward.
I am not in anyway effected by your posts just find you boring and worth challenging. So far your replies have been very poor. This safety reflex of calling me inferior is witless.
Believe me young man I have no inferiority complex with regard to you.
I proclaim I am a Swansea fan too, I have no interest in proving the obvious. If you disbelieve me on any aspect then that amuses me, it certainly doesn't give me the motivation to ease your clearly troubled thoughts. You are definitely affected by my posts, I dictate how long you stay here, how you respond, when you go to bed, the minutes in the day you think of me - you are certainly affected make no mistake.
Totally deluded young man. The attempt at reverse psychology is amusing. You know you can't let this go! Your own paranoia is palpable to anybody reading this thread.
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:48 pm
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:54 pm
SnackaJack wrote:Yep good point you are totally not obsessed, what was I thinking
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:54 pm
Plynlymonbluebird wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Yep good point you are totally not obsessed, what was I thinking
You lost heavily tonight then Mr. Anonymous!
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:56 pm
SnackaJack wrote:Plynlymonbluebird wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Yep good point you are totally not obsessed, what was I thinking
You lost heavily tonight then Mr. Anonymous!
Oh yes, clearly. There are no signs of obsession all
Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:59 pm
Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:08 pm
ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:52 pm
SnackaJack wrote:Yes of course they can see, glorious HD some may say. How can about 70 of someones last 75 posts being about one man be classed as obsessed?
Don't know what we are all thinking.
Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:59 pm
SnackaJack wrote:Anyway sorry to the thread as we were hijacked by another Snacka super fan. The thread tried to get back on topic with CCFCsince1962 asking an on topic question which of course got lost among the fan mail. Any further fan-mail please direct to my PM box where I will field them one by one as time dictates. Back to the topic:-
He asked.....ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Fri Jun 23, 2017 10:13 pm
Plynlymonbluebird wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Yes of course they can see, glorious HD some may say. How can about 70 of someones last 75 posts being about one man be classed as obsessed?
Don't know what we are all thinking.
What a poor strategy!
You come in here deliberately to try and wind Cardiff fans up! You sneer relentlessly about your common sense and intellectual superiority.
Then like clockwork when someone challenges you to prove your credentials. You cry like a little child about obsessions and fans and mental inferiorities.
Simply prove what you claim to be! It must be so easy for a successful and Intellectual giant like yourself!
I suspect it might prove impossible for you! Just like your fabulous football career with Carmarthen Town and Llenelli FC that never actually happened
Sat Jun 24, 2017 11:17 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Anyway sorry to the thread as we were hijacked by another Snacka super fan. The thread tried to get back on topic with CCFCsince1962 asking an on topic question which of course got lost among the fan mail. Any further fan-mail please direct to my PM box where I will field them one by one as time dictates. Back to the topic:-
He asked.....ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Stands by the original comment, no confusion
Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:10 pm
ccfcsince1962 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Anyway sorry to the thread as we were hijacked by another Snacka super fan. The thread tried to get back on topic with CCFCsince1962 asking an on topic question which of course got lost among the fan mail. Any further fan-mail please direct to my PM box where I will field them one by one as time dictates. Back to the topic:-
He asked.....ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Stands by the original comment, no confusion
That is strange,because neither CCCF nor the EFL agree with the figures he has told you, saying that they relate to two years of parachute payments. Who is your source and where has he obtained his figures from?
Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:42 pm
ccfcsince1962 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Anyway sorry to the thread as we were hijacked by another Snacka super fan. The thread tried to get back on topic with CCFCsince1962 asking an on topic question which of course got lost among the fan mail. Any further fan-mail please direct to my PM box where I will field them one by one as time dictates. Back to the topic:-
He asked.....ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Stands by the original comment, no confusion
That is strange,because neither CCCF nor the EFL agree with the figures he has told you, saying that they relate to two years of parachute payments. Who is your source and where has he obtained his figures from?
Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:46 pm
64JACK wrote:ccfcsince1962 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Anyway sorry to the thread as we were hijacked by another Snacka super fan. The thread tried to get back on topic with CCFCsince1962 asking an on topic question which of course got lost among the fan mail. Any further fan-mail please direct to my PM box where I will field them one by one as time dictates. Back to the topic:-
He asked.....ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Stands by the original comment, no confusion
That is strange,because neither CCCF nor the EFL agree with the figures he has told you, saying that they relate to two years of parachute payments. Who is your source and where has he obtained his figures from?
I'm pretty sure he's made them up. This is the second occasion worcester has posted a thread regarding you receiving extra money. viewtopic.php?f=2&t=185065
Fact is, you get your last years parachute payment of £16m plus any money that you receive from the football league TV deal. There is nothing extra due to Newcastle being promoted or any other fantasy notion that people wish to dream up. Newcastles remaining parachute payments have been split between the Premier league clubs. Personally i don't agree with it as i believe the extra money should be a bonus payment into grass roots football. But it is what it is, and those are the facts.
Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:55 pm
Sun Jun 25, 2017 8:58 pm
Sun Jun 25, 2017 10:14 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:ccfcsince1962 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Anyway sorry to the thread as we were hijacked by another Snacka super fan. The thread tried to get back on topic with CCFCsince1962 asking an on topic question which of course got lost among the fan mail. Any further fan-mail please direct to my PM box where I will field them one by one as time dictates. Back to the topic:-
He asked.....ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Stands by the original comment, no confusion
That is strange,because neither CCCF nor the EFL agree with the figures he has told you, saying that they relate to two years of parachute payments. Who is your source and where has he obtained his figures from?
Sorry, only just seen this reply from you.
Not going to say who told me this, only that I trust their information. Did I ask where they got it from? I can't say I did. As I've said, this person has never given me any reason for me to doubt them in the past.
I've never pretended to be an expert on the financial side of a football club, just going by what I was told. More or less everything I was told, I posted on here.
Mon Jun 26, 2017 12:21 am
ccfcsince1962 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:ccfcsince1962 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Anyway sorry to the thread as we were hijacked by another Snacka super fan. The thread tried to get back on topic with CCFCsince1962 asking an on topic question which of course got lost among the fan mail. Any further fan-mail please direct to my PM box where I will field them one by one as time dictates. Back to the topic:-
He asked.....ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Stands by the original comment, no confusion
That is strange,because neither CCCF nor the EFL agree with the figures he has told you, saying that they relate to two years of parachute payments. Who is your source and where has he obtained his figures from?
Sorry, only just seen this reply from you.
Not going to say who told me this, only that I trust their information. Did I ask where they got it from? I can't say I did. As I've said, this person has never given me any reason for me to doubt them in the past.
I've never pretended to be an expert on the financial side of a football club, just going by what I was told. More or less everything I was told, I posted on here.
Ned.
My response wasn't having a dig at you, or Annis for that matter, as I believe that your two sources of information ( Annis implies that his source is separate to yours but this is not entirely clear or whether the "source " is the same person who has told you both the same thing separately. However, you don't name your source or even give a clue as to how he might know the information he suggests is accurate.
My two sources that say that the claim of a £16m extra payment to the club is simply not true are senior people at the English Football League who deal with the allocation and distribution of such funds and the senior people at CCFC itself.Is your " source even able to say where he gets the information from upon which he bases his claim?
Keith
Mon Jun 26, 2017 4:36 am
Mon Jul 03, 2017 10:56 am
worcester_ccfc wrote:ccfcsince1962 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:ccfcsince1962 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:SnackaJack wrote:Anyway sorry to the thread as we were hijacked by another Snacka super fan. The thread tried to get back on topic with CCFCsince1962 asking an on topic question which of course got lost among the fan mail. Any further fan-mail please direct to my PM box where I will field them one by one as time dictates. Back to the topic:-
He asked.....ccfcsince1962 wrote:Ned
Did you ever check if your source simply got confused over the parachute payment amounts?
Stands by the original comment, no confusion
That is strange,because neither CCCF nor the EFL agree with the figures he has told you, saying that they relate to two years of parachute payments. Who is your source and where has he obtained his figures from?
Sorry, only just seen this reply from you.
Not going to say who told me this, only that I trust their information. Did I ask where they got it from? I can't say I did. As I've said, this person has never given me any reason for me to doubt them in the past.
I've never pretended to be an expert on the financial side of a football club, just going by what I was told. More or less everything I was told, I posted on here.
Ned.
My response wasn't having a dig at you, or Annis for that matter, as I believe that your two sources of information ( Annis implies that his source is separate to yours but this is not entirely clear or whether the "source " is the same person who has told you both the same thing separately. However, you don't name your source or even give a clue as to how he might know the information he suggests is accurate.
My two sources that say that the claim of a £16m extra payment to the club is simply not true are senior people at the English Football League who deal with the allocation and distribution of such funds and the senior people at CCFC itself.Is your " source even able to say where he gets the information from upon which he bases his claim?
Keith
To answer your question, in short - no.
I don't doubt you either, in what you say. This may be wrong, or may be right. Either way, I only posted what I was told and I do trust what I was told as I'm sure you trust your sources.
As I say, I'm no expert on the financial side of a football club. You have much more knowledge on that than I do.
Mon Jul 03, 2017 3:18 pm