Sat Jul 08, 2017 3:46 pm
dogfound wrote:piledriver64 wrote:This is standard practice in public sector.
The suspension will be on full pay and reviewed weekly whilst the investigation goes on.
It's not about her support for this cause but more about t&cs that preclude publicly acting/supporting political causes without prior clearance.
If she hasn't breached those conditions then the suspension will be lifted and no further action taken. She will not be able to sue as long as the employers follow their HR policies to the letter.
It would be the same if it had been a cummunist /left extremist rally.
Nothing new or unusual, a bit of a non-story I think.
id be more than wiiling to see this point if anyone of the people like your self came up with the list of probably hundreds of thousands of public sector employees who have over time been treated likewise.
its flat out censorship...dont go to EDL protests or risk being under threat of losing your job.
THATS THE MESSAGE
please stop pretending its not.
Sat Jul 08, 2017 10:03 pm
Sven wrote:dogfound wrote:piledriver64 wrote:This is standard practice in public sector.
The suspension will be on full pay and reviewed weekly whilst the investigation goes on.
It's not about her support for this cause but more about t&cs that preclude publicly acting/supporting political causes without prior clearance.
If she hasn't breached those conditions then the suspension will be lifted and no further action taken. She will not be able to sue as long as the employers follow their HR policies to the letter.
It would be the same if it had been a cummunist /left extremist rally.
Nothing new or unusual, a bit of a non-story I think.
id be more than wiiling to see this point if anyone of the people like your self came up with the list of probably hundreds of thousands of public sector employees who have over time been treated likewise.
its flat out censorship...dont go to EDL protests or risk being under threat of losing your job.
THATS THE MESSAGE
please stop pretending its not.
No, sorry but you're way off kilter here!
The practice is more common than you think; particularly where there is a 'public' element involved, e.g. where the investigated individual is a government/council employee
Only a week or so ago, a lot of people were engaging with an individual who claimed to have been on hunger strike, having allegedly been treated in similar fashion by Cardiff City Council
Try to understand the term 'safeguarding', as it simply means the employer (rightly or wrongly) is protecting their own and their stakeholder interests by taking the employee out of the arena whilst they investigate
What if it turned out the employee was involved in something sinister and they had done nothing about it despite the warnings? People would rightly go into meltdown!
It is also worth a look at what ACAS have to say on the matter when disputes are eventually sent to them for arbitration. It might just surprise you!
The big difference is publicity and you rarely here of the majority of cases that occur because the media haven't jumped on them for their own reporting interests
Not hearing about cases doesn't mean that they don't occur!
Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:56 am
Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:25 am
dogfound wrote:Sven wrote:dogfound wrote:piledriver64 wrote:This is standard practice in public sector.
The suspension will be on full pay and reviewed weekly whilst the investigation goes on.
It's not about her support for this cause but more about t&cs that preclude publicly acting/supporting political causes without prior clearance.
If she hasn't breached those conditions then the suspension will be lifted and no further action taken. She will not be able to sue as long as the employers follow their HR policies to the letter.
It would be the same if it had been a cummunist /left extremist rally.
Nothing new or unusual, a bit of a non-story I think.
id be more than wiiling to see this point if anyone of the people like your self came up with the list of probably hundreds of thousands of public sector employees who have over time been treated likewise.
its flat out censorship...dont go to EDL protests or risk being under threat of losing your job.
THATS THE MESSAGE
please stop pretending its not.
No, sorry but you're way off kilter here!
The practice is more common than you think; particularly where there is a 'public' element involved, e.g. where the investigated individual is a government/council employee
Only a week or so ago, a lot of people were engaging with an individual who claimed to have been on hunger strike, having allegedly been treated in similar fashion by Cardiff City Council
Try to understand the term 'safeguarding', as it simply means the employer (rightly or wrongly) is protecting their own and their stakeholder interests by taking the employee out of the arena whilst they investigate
What if it turned out the employee was involved in something sinister and they had done nothing about it despite the warnings? People would rightly go into meltdown!
It is also worth a look at what ACAS have to say on the matter when disputes are eventually sent to them for arbitration. It might just surprise you!
The big difference is publicity and you rarely here of the majority of cases that occur because the media haven't jumped on them for their own reporting interests
Not hearing about cases doesn't mean that they don't occur!
out of kilter.?
go on suprise me give me any person ..any list...there must be hundreds of thousands on it...and not blokes unfaily sacked for god knows what { fella on here probably with mental health issues that you have brought into it for no reason??????????????????????}
taking part in a protest/demo/march = suspendion... pleae give examples..
its wrong..your wrong..either back it up or dont.....your post here is the later...a lets PRETEND its standard practice with absolutely no evidence.
Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:46 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Suspension is routine while they look into incident! Standard practice in all gvmnt jobs? Stupid I know but that's gvmnt for you.