vietaff wrote:No loan player needed....go bring Joe Ledley home, experienced player and we know what he's capable of. Be a great sub as and when needed and if was required to fill in due to injury or suspension he'd do a job
vietaff wrote:No loan player needed....go bring Joe Ledley home, experienced player and we know what he's capable of. Be a great sub as and when needed and if was required to fill in due to injury or suspension he'd do a job
vietaff wrote:No loan player needed....go bring Joe Ledley home, experienced player and we know what he's capable of. Be a great sub as and when needed and if was required to fill in due to injury or suspension he'd do a job
boyo1927 wrote:Ledley on a free is a no brainer! Has to be reasonable wages so 15k a week should be made as a deal! A loan fee and wages would have to be made anyway! Ledley is still a good player
Bonner wrote:No for Ledley... rather we sign a player who wants to come here for the football, rather than sign a player who wants to come here as it is convenient for him.
paulh_85 wrote:Bonner wrote:No for Ledley... rather we sign a player who wants to come here for the football, rather than sign a player who wants to come here as it is convenient for him.
did you hold that view when it was bellamy though?
Alan_in_China wrote:vietaff wrote:No loan player needed....go bring Joe Ledley home, experienced player and we know what he's capable of. Be a great sub as and when needed and if was required to fill in due to injury or suspension he'd do a job
Ledley would be coming to us for his own convenience and because a pay-cheque from us is better than no pay-cheque at all. I think Warnock would see through that.
Bonner wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Bonner wrote:No for Ledley... rather we sign a player who wants to come here for the football, rather than sign a player who wants to come here as it is convenient for him.
did you hold that view when it was bellamy though?
Totally different, Bellamy was still not far off top his game, a number of prem clubs would of loved to have him...
castleblue wrote:In my opinion NW has done a fantastic job during this summers transfer window as he has transformed the team on the pitch and the quality available to him. But we should remember this is still only his 2nd transfer window as our manager so it's no surprise to me that he may want a "Loan" midfielder as a 'Just In Case' addition to the squad.
If we are still in the mix come January expect him to make further additions as he reforms the squad to fully reflect a good NW team. If last night showed anything is demonstrated we are not quite there yet.
I do think he should offer Joe Ledley a short term contract until Christmas to see if he can contribute, if not Joe I expect an unattached player or two to join even after the window closes.
paulh_85 wrote:vietaff wrote:No loan player needed....go bring Joe Ledley home, experienced player and we know what he's capable of. Be a great sub as and when needed and if was required to fill in due to injury or suspension he'd do a job
yeah we know what hes capable of which means we shouldnt sign him
Sven wrote:Alan_in_China wrote:vietaff wrote:No loan player needed....go bring Joe Ledley home, experienced player and we know what he's capable of. Be a great sub as and when needed and if was required to fill in due to injury or suspension he'd do a job
Ledley would be coming to us for his own convenience and because a pay-cheque from us is better than no pay-cheque at all. I think Warnock would see through that.
Alan, you are spot-on and I hope you are right (on Neil Warnock seeing through him) although I believe he simply doesn't 'fit' the manager's preferred style. We wouldn't look at him twice if he wasn't from The 'Diff!
This is rapidly turning into 'The Joe Ledley Show' and I'm with those who think he has mis-calculated his worth in the current transfer market. Like the very fortunate Hal Robson-Kanu, he bid his time, looked around but no one offered the money he thought he was worth and now it appears (if stories are correct) that he's trying to plump for the 'convenient' option of the club nearest to his new home!
To my mind, if he was even loosely in the thoughts of our manager, he wouldn't be training with (no disrespect to them) Barry Town right now!
Valley Lad wrote:Sven wrote:Alan_in_China wrote:vietaff wrote:No loan player needed....go bring Joe Ledley home, experienced player and we know what he's capable of. Be a great sub as and when needed and if was required to fill in due to injury or suspension he'd do a job
Ledley would be coming to us for his own convenience and because a pay-cheque from us is better than no pay-cheque at all. I think Warnock would see through that.
Alan, you are spot-on and I hope you are right (on Neil Warnock seeing through him) although I believe he simply doesn't 'fit' the manager's preferred style. We wouldn't look at him twice if he wasn't from The 'Diff!
This is rapidly turning into 'The Joe Ledley Show' and I'm with those who think he has mis-calculated his worth in the current transfer market. Like the very fortunate Hal Robson-Kanu, he bid his time, looked around but no one offered the money he thought he was worth and now it appears (if stories are correct) that he's trying to plump for the 'convenient' option of the club nearest to his new home!
To my mind, if he was even loosely in the thoughts of our manager, he wouldn't be training with (no disrespect to them) Barry Town right now!
I can confirm that Ledley isn't and never has been training with Barry Town
Salty68 wrote:I'd like to see Snodgrass here, not wanted by the Hammers.
Users browsing this forum: Bambasbestbuddy22, Blakey59, bluebirdoct1962, Clickagy [Bot], DotBot [Bot], FOOTSOLDIER, Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], montyblue, pembroke allan, Proximic [Bot], worcester_ccfc and 197 guests