Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:02 am
Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:02 am
Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:38 am
Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:42 am
Ruislip Blue wrote:Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Yet there are those who want to drop him. You couldn't make it up could you
Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:12 pm
Ruislip Blue wrote:Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Yet there are those who want to drop him. You couldn't make it up could you
Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:18 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Ruislip Blue wrote:Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Yet there are those who want to drop him. You couldn't make it up could you
are there ?
Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:20 pm
2blue2handle wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Ruislip Blue wrote:Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Yet there are those who want to drop him. You couldn't make it up could you
are there ?
Yup, I seen people on a message I think about Bryson saying they would drop him which I find odd.
He has been brilliant.
Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:41 pm
paulh_85 wrote:2blue2handle wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Ruislip Blue wrote:Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Yet there are those who want to drop him. You couldn't make it up could you
are there ?
Yup, I seen people on a message I think about Bryson saying they would drop him which I find odd.
He has been brilliant.
id put bryson in for damour personally
Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:42 pm
Ruislip Blue wrote:paulh_85 wrote:2blue2handle wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Ruislip Blue wrote:Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Yet there are those who want to drop him. You couldn't make it up could you
are there ?
Yup, I seen people on a message I think about Bryson saying they would drop him which I find odd.
He has been brilliant.
id put bryson in for damour personally
Statistically, Damour (6.70) is a better player than Bryson (6.31) ergo, you'd be weakening the team. (not by much admittedly.)
And, if played in his best position, namely centre midfield, then Damour comes out as 7.70, which is way better than Gunnarsson.
https://www.whoscored.com/Players/29451 ... AFc-Damour
https://www.whoscored.com/Players/7955/ ... aig-Bryson
I love stats by the way
Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:44 pm
paulh_85 wrote:Ruislip Blue wrote:paulh_85 wrote:2blue2handle wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Ruislip Blue wrote:Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Yet there are those who want to drop him. You couldn't make it up could you
are there ?
Yup, I seen people on a message I think about Bryson saying they would drop him which I find odd.
He has been brilliant.
id put bryson in for damour personally
Statistically, Damour (6.70) is a better player than Bryson (6.31) ergo, you'd be weakening the team. (not by much admittedly.)
And, if played in his best position, namely centre midfield, then Damour comes out as 7.70, which is way better than Gunnarsson.
https://www.whoscored.com/Players/29451 ... AFc-Damour
https://www.whoscored.com/Players/7955/ ... aig-Bryson
I love stats by the way
those statistics dont really count for much at all
fan of stats myself but you cant really use them to judge
Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:47 pm
Ruislip Blue wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Ruislip Blue wrote:paulh_85 wrote:2blue2handle wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Ruislip Blue wrote:Sven wrote:Particularly pleased for Joe Ralls
Yet there are those who want to drop him. You couldn't make it up could you
are there ?
Yup, I seen people on a message I think about Bryson saying they would drop him which I find odd.
He has been brilliant.
id put bryson in for damour personally
Statistically, Damour (6.70) is a better player than Bryson (6.31) ergo, you'd be weakening the team. (not by much admittedly.)
And, if played in his best position, namely centre midfield, then Damour comes out as 7.70, which is way better than Gunnarsson.
https://www.whoscored.com/Players/29451 ... AFc-Damour
https://www.whoscored.com/Players/7955/ ... aig-Bryson
I love stats by the way
those statistics dont really count for much at all
fan of stats myself but you cant really use them to judge
So this entire thread is a waste of time then. As its all stats based
Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:37 pm
Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:52 pm
City Slicker wrote:To be honest isn't it great to see, as opposed to previous seasons, that we have no weaknesses in the first team. Also we have players like Manga, Bryson, Patterson, Tomlin, Harris and Healey to come. I'm sure we all have our individual preferences but there sure aren't any weak links any more.
Wed Sep 06, 2017 6:00 pm
City Slicker wrote:To be honest isn't it great to see, as opposed to previous seasons, that we have no weaknesses in the first team. Also we have players like Manga, Bryson, Patterson, Tomlin, Harris and Healey to come. I'm sure we all have our individual preferences but there sure aren't any weak links any more.
Thu Sep 07, 2017 10:55 am
2blue2handle wrote:City Slicker wrote:To be honest isn't it great to see, as opposed to previous seasons, that we have no weaknesses in the first team. Also we have players like Manga, Bryson, Patterson, Tomlin, Harris and Healey to come. I'm sure we all have our individual preferences but there sure aren't any weak links any more.
Really looking forward to seeing Patterson I think he might give us another dimension.