ae15 wrote:Don't really see the point in that for us at all? Paying to get rid of a player who isn't that bad.
ae15 wrote:Don't really see the point in that for us at all? Paying to get rid of a player who isn't that bad.
Mike Strinati wrote:Sounds like another deal where trying to screw Cardiff over.
Forever Blue wrote:ae15 wrote:Don't really see the point in that for us at all? Paying to get rid of a player who isn't that bad.
I agree Wez, We did it with Craig Noone and Adam Le Fondre had to go.
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Mike Strinati wrote:Sounds like another deal where trying to screw Cardiff over.
That's not their fault though is it? We were the one's who gave AP a £20kpw contract and now decide he is not worth the wad.
I still think it makes sense to pay off AP half of what we contractually owe him between now and the end of the season and use the saving to fund a loan or permanent player.
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:ae15 wrote:Don't really see the point in that for us at all? Paying to get rid of a player who isn't that bad.
I agree Wez, We did it with Craig Noone and Adam Le Fondre had to go.
Wez ? I'm the only wez on this board
Jasonccfc wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:ae15 wrote:Don't really see the point in that for us at all? Paying to get rid of a player who isn't that bad.
I agree Wez, We did it with Craig Noone and Adam Le Fondre had to go.
Wez ? I'm the only wez on this board
#
HHmmmm
Bobbank59 wrote:When you say Bolton would pay Pilks £10,000 a week, then City would pay him off; how much do you think we would have to pay Pilks?
Jasonccfc wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:ae15 wrote:Don't really see the point in that for us at all? Paying to get rid of a player who isn't that bad.
I agree Wez, We did it with Craig Noone and Adam Le Fondre had to go.
Wez ? I'm the only wez on this board
#
HHmmmm
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:ae15 wrote:Don't really see the point in that for us at all? Paying to get rid of a player who isn't that bad.
I agree Wez, We did it with Craig Noone and Adam Le Fondre had to go.
Wez ? I'm the only wez on this board
CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:Bobbank59 wrote:When you say Bolton would pay Pilks £10,000 a week, then City would pay him off; how much do you think we would have to pay Pilks?
someone said about 700k above, not sure how accurate that is but it's more than I can say
dogfound wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:Bobbank59 wrote:When you say Bolton would pay Pilks £10,000 a week, then City would pay him off; how much do you think we would have to pay Pilks?
someone said about 700k above, not sure how accurate that is but it's more than I can say
his contract has 18 months left. 70 weeks at 10k...is 700k...as i said im going off the figures on here ..
every negotiation is different..he could be awkward and say he is happy to stick around for his monthly check..or he could be desperate to have a fresh start and be prepared to take a hit like Emyr Huws..
im sure most of us would not be prepared to take a 700k hit though...???????????
wez1927 wrote:dogfound wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:Bobbank59 wrote:When you say Bolton would pay Pilks £10,000 a week, then City would pay him off; how much do you think we would have to pay Pilks?
someone said about 700k above, not sure how accurate that is but it's more than I can say
his contract has 18 months left. 70 weeks at 10k...is 700k...as i said im going off the figures on here ..
every negotiation is different..he could be awkward and say he is happy to stick around for his monthly check..or he could be desperate to have a fresh start and be prepared to take a hit like Emyr Huws..
im sure most of us would not be prepared to take a 700k hit though...???????????
It depends if Bolton give him a 3 year contract and bonuses
Users browsing this forum: Bakedalasker, Clickagy [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Igovernor, jimmy_rat, Penboy, Proximic [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 206 guests