paulh_85 wrote:Totally agree about jazz tonight. Slightly confused with people picking etheridge
Agree with zohore too he was much better, really needs a goal though
NyeBluebird wrote:paulh_85 wrote:Totally agree about jazz tonight. Slightly confused with people picking etheridge
Agree with zohore too he was much better, really needs a goal though
Confused about picking Etheridge? The guy saved us many times, even when he didn't make saves he closed down quick enough to force the striker into putting it wide.
phildavies wrote:Played well most surprising thing for me was the amount of headers he won.
RhiwEbbwBluebird wrote:He had a decent game but i aint convinced, he always looks sloppy infront of goal to me not a deadly clinical finisher to gobble them chances up that comes into the box, he scores wonder goals but id rather someone like grabban who would be more alert and deadly in the box
northernbluebird wrote:RhiwEbbwBluebird wrote:He had a decent game but i aint convinced, he always looks sloppy infront of goal to me not a deadly clinical finisher to gobble them chances up that comes into the box, he scores wonder goals but id rather someone like grabban who would be more alert and deadly in the box
Lots of predatory strikers out there who are better finishers thab zohore in and around the box, i would rather have a striker like that because we create the chances just aint got no1 to put them away, zohore aint that man i dont think
a player with the ability to hold the ball up and bring others into play, plus a clinical finisher, would cost £30m+ in this market. in fact, how many players in the premier league fit that description? not too many. for the championship he is unplayable. he's probably averaged around 1 in 3 so his goalscoring is fine, but his real value is as a striker who runs the channels and is perfect for english football.
Users browsing this forum: Clickagy [Bot], DotBot [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], ias [Bot], MOZZER1, Proximic [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 184 guests