llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
paulh_85 wrote:Yet another negative sticky
llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
We won.
Who knows what would have happened had he not made those subs. Might have been two nil or we might have been beat or drew. Then you would have been on here dripping about that.
maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
We won.
Who knows what would have happened had he not made those subs. Might have been two nil or we might have been beat or drew. Then you would have been on here dripping about that.
bluespeers wrote:maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
We won.
Who knows what would have happened had he not made those subs. Might have been two nil or we might have been beat or drew. Then you would have been on here dripping about that.
I don't alway agree with NW team selections/Subs etc and sometimes it will back fire but he is a Top Manager and as the the saying goes In Neil We Trust, he knows the players better than us, great win and puts us back in the mix
Sven wrote:The first substation baffled me and a few others around me but the other two I could sort of see
maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
We won.
Who knows what would have happened had he not made those subs. Might have been two nil or we might have been beat or drew. Then you would have been on here dripping about that.
2blue2handle wrote:maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
We won.
Who knows what would have happened had he not made those subs. Might have been two nil or we might have been beat or drew. Then you would have been on here dripping about that.
Exactly, how many times did we drop point's under Dave Jones because we would never change it from his 442 in games.
The right subs are the ones that result in a win.
valleyrambill wrote:Pity Wales didn't have Warnock when wales played England in the euros . we were 1 nil up and England brought on
2 strikers with Vardy and Sturridge beginning of the second half and coleman didn't react as Warnock did yesterday.
We got 3 points yesterday and maybe who knows if Coleman had put James Collins on that game against England might
have been different so I think because of the result yesterday Warnock was right
pembroke allan wrote:maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
We won.
Who knows what would have happened had he not made those subs. Might have been two nil or we might have been beat or drew. Then you would have been on here dripping about that.
Did notice he changed mind on last sub someone was stripped to come on but then changed mind and Brought on different player! !
llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
oohahhPaulMillar wrote:llan bluebird wrote:I thought we were cruising then the subs invited them to attack by playing 5 at the back then Halford sitting......
3 points, so i know fcuk all, but that could easily have been a different story.
After he brought the subs on how many shots on target did Boro have...none
How many shots on goal..none
How many times did Etheridge have to make a safe ...none
How many times did Boro look dangerous...none
So we didn't "dodge a bullet" did we??
Users browsing this forum: A Quiet Monkfish, Clickagy [Bot], DotBot [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Proximic [Bot] and 202 guests