Danny Says wrote:https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/brentford-1-3-cardiff-city-14407280
This guy Booth is a joke. To attribute the City win in part to luck is an insult as well as totally inaccurate.
The WM has never properly replaced Karl Woodward.
The ratings are also inaccurate as mentioned in an earlier post.
What a clown this guy is. I actually felt we shaded the first half overall and we deserved to go in ahead with all the saves the Brentford keeper had to make and the clearances off the line. As soon as we went 3-1 up, we managed the game well. We dropped a bit deeper and allowed Brentford to have the ball a bit more to come at us, but we stayed organised, soaked up the pressure and could have easily got a fourth goal on the break.
Yes, Brentford had a few chances, but so did we. The stats show Brentford had 6 shots on target and we had 9 shots on target. The Brentford keeper was clearly the busiest. For Booth to suggest we were lucky to win although we had the most shots on target is absolutely insane. We deservedly won and we could have easily won by a few more.