Not disclosed
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2018 2:54 pm
Tell me what is the advantage of not disclosing the fee you have paid for a player?......im sure nubbsy will be able to help me with this one
Cardiff City FC Forum/Messageboard - for all things Cardiff City FC
https://cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
worcester_ccfc wrote:If we disclose how much we spend on players, other clubs will put prices up for their players. Same goes for when you sell a player, clubs will know how much money you have and will increase prices.
More or less all permanent transfers for all clubs are undisclosed fees these days.
worcester_ccfc wrote:If we disclose how much we spend on players, other clubs will put prices up for their players. Same goes for when you sell a player, clubs will know how much money you have and will increase prices.
More or less all permanent transfers for all clubs are undisclosed fees these days.
davids wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:If we disclose how much we spend on players, other clubs will put prices up for their players. Same goes for when you sell a player, clubs will know how much money you have and will increase prices.
More or less all permanent transfers for all clubs are undisclosed fees these days.
I see the logic in what you're saying but it's been widely reported that Murphy was around £11m and Cunningham between £3.5m and £4m.
I remember Warnock laughing when hearing that we'd paid £3m for Tomlin and him saying that it was closer to half of that.
So perhaps the figures being bandied around for our two signings aren't terribly accurate?
davids wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:If we disclose how much we spend on players, other clubs will put prices up for their players. Same goes for when you sell a player, clubs will know how much money you have and will increase prices.
More or less all permanent transfers for all clubs are undisclosed fees these days.
I see the logic in what you're saying but it's been widely reported that Murphy was around £11m and Cunningham between £3.5m and £4m.
I remember Warnock laughing when hearing that we'd paid £3m for Tomlin and him saying that it was closer to half of that.
So perhaps the figures being bandied around for our two signings aren't terribly accurate?