Team v Brighton

A forum for all things Cardiff City

Team v Brighton

Postby Lengee » Tue Nov 06, 2018 4:57 pm

After is not available. Please Neil Warnock .... No more square pegs in round holes. ie please don't try to get JH in the team by chopping and changing. He is not in good form anyway and it would mean Camaras a playing deeper, when he is much better going forward than defending.

Use Loic Damour as a like for like replacement. Otherwise what is the point in him being in the 25?

I personally would liked to have seen Manga at centre defence about 7 games ago. And Zahore upfront. But this is such an imp game, we probably can't afford to change too much.

We have lost 2 matches which I was hoping we might win or at least get something from (Burnley and Leicester home). We definitely cannot afford to get less than a WIN against Brighton :bluebird:
I think we will do it!
Come on Neil! Come on City! :thumbup: :ayatollah:
Lengee
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:02 pm

Team v Brighton

Advertisement

Advertisement
Login or Register to remove this ad.

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby thomasblue » Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:36 pm

4231

Move patterson back to right back as he is probably our best option in that position.

Drop Etheridge for smithies ( his distribution frustrates the shit out of me )

Replace Bamba who is not good enough for this level with Bruno Manga

Get harris out wide with his pace and let him and murphy get in behind the defences.

Smithies

Patterson
Manga
Morrison
Bennett

Gunnarsson
Ralls

Murphy
Camarasa
Harris

Reid
thomasblue
 
Posts: 3950
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:20 pm

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby bluebirdoct1962 » Tue Nov 06, 2018 6:40 pm

Lengee wrote:After is not available. Please Neil Warnock .... No more square pegs in round holes. ie please don't try to get JH in the team by chopping and changing. He is not in good form anyway and it would mean Camaras a playing deeper, when he is much better going forward than defending.

Use Loic Damour as a like for like replacement. Otherwise what is the point in him being in the 25?

I personally would liked to have seen Manga at centre defence about 7 games ago. And Zahore upfront. But this is such an imp game, we probably can't afford to change too much.

We have lost 2 matches which I was hoping we might win or at least get something from (Burnley and Leicester home). We definitely cannot afford to get less than a WIN against Brighton :bluebird:
I think we will do it!
Come on Neil! Come on City! :thumbup: :ayatollah:


My team would be

Etheridge

Richards Manga. Morrison. Bennett


Camarasa. Gunnarsson. Damour. Murphy
Reid
Paterson
bluebirdoct1962
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:39 am

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby 2blue2handle » Tue Nov 06, 2018 7:21 pm

Etheridge

Jazz
Manga
Morrison
Bennett

Gunner
Demour
Camarasa

Reid
Ward
Murphy

If Ralls is available then him for demour but I think I read he was injured.
User avatar
2blue2handle
 
Posts: 28014
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby Lengee » Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:05 pm

Yes I think the same as the above. That set up would be fine.The only area I might disagree is centre forward. i.e.whether we stick with Paterson or switch to Zahore or Ward. At the moment there is little to choose between them. On balance it might be best to go with Paterson so that the team is not chipped and changed too much. But ,if fit, I think KZ has most potential. To be honest I think he has been made a scapegoat ....he had very few starts.
:bluebird:
Lengee
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 7:02 pm

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby 2blue2handle » Tue Nov 06, 2018 8:14 pm

Lengee wrote:Yes I think the same as the above. That set up would be fine.The only area I might disagree is centre forward. i.e.whether we stick with Paterson or switch to Zahore or Ward. At the moment there is little to choose between them. On balance it might be best to go with Paterson so that the team is not chipped and changed too much. But ,if fit, I think KZ has most potential. To be honest I think he has been made a scapegoat ....he had very few starts.
:bluebird:


I read Zohore was injured for a few weeks otherwise I'd pick him.
User avatar
2blue2handle
 
Posts: 28014
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:31 pm
Location: Cardiff

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby SirJimmySchoular » Wed Nov 07, 2018 12:42 am

Lengee wrote:Yes I think the same as the above. That set up would be fine.The only area I might disagree is centre forward. i.e.whether we stick with Paterson or switch to Zahore or Ward. At the moment there is little to choose between them. On balance it might be best to go with Paterson so that the team is not chipped and changed too much. But ,if fit, I think KZ has most potential. To be honest I think he has been made a scapegoat ....he had very few starts.
:bluebird:


I don't know whether he's had a breakdown or something because he just seems to jog round constantly grinning like a retard.
He used to be a really good player, but there's something very wrong there now
SirJimmySchoular
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:52 pm

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby bluebirdoct1962 » Wed Nov 07, 2018 6:59 am

SirJimmySchoular wrote:
Lengee wrote:Yes I think the same as the above. That set up would be fine.The only area I might disagree is centre forward. i.e.whether we stick with Paterson or switch to Zahore or Ward. At the moment there is little to choose between them. On balance it might be best to go with Paterson so that the team is not chipped and changed too much. But ,if fit, I think KZ has most potential. To be honest I think he has been made a scapegoat ....he had very few starts.
:bluebird:


I don't know whether he's had a breakdown or something because he just seems to jog round constantly grinning like a retard.
He used to be a really good player, but there's something very wrong there now

It does make you wonder.
Or is it just a case of he’s got a 3 year contract and is made for life and he’s thinking I’m not busting s gut for anything or anyone
bluebirdoct1962
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:39 am

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby Llantwit Blue » Wed Nov 07, 2018 8:47 am

Can’t believe people would still start with Zohore.

If he wants to get in the team he has to work 100 times harder and show 100 times more desire whenever he steps foot on that pitch.
Llantwit Blue
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 11:29 am

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby Brezza » Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:52 am

Don’t always agree with 2blue2handle but defo do with his proposed team. Perfect. Strength guts and speed. Just what we need for Brighton. Damour is so underrrated. Ward played well when selected. He is a natural striker and will run his butt off.
Brezza
 
Posts: 905
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:22 pm

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby Bananas » Wed Nov 07, 2018 10:32 am

FFS get Leo back to sort it out mun :old:
Bananas
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2017 9:18 pm

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby Bluebirdaff » Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:01 am

Really don't like the way our full backs have been playing, would switch Bennett for cuningham and put Patterson right back
Bluebirdaff
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2018 9:30 pm

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby piledriver64 » Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:00 pm

Etheridge

Richards (Cunningham if not fit) Manga Bamba Bennett

Camarrassa Gunnarsson Paterson

Hoilett Ward Murphy
piledriver64
 
Posts: 1895
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:45 pm

Re: Team v Brighton

Postby bluebirdoct1962 » Wed Nov 07, 2018 2:51 pm

Bluebirdaff wrote:Really don't like the way our full backs have been playing, would switch Bennett for cuningham and put Patterson right back

Good call re Cunningham. Not sure about CP at right back though.
bluebirdoct1962
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:39 am



Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 2blue2handle, Bing [Bot], bluebirdoct1962, cityone, Google [Bot], HARRYccfc1927, llangainbluebird, paulh_85, Tony Blue Williams and 187 guests

Disclaimer :
The views and comments entered in these forums are personal and are not necessarily those of the management of this board.
The management of this board is not responsible for the content of any external internet sites.