Sat Mar 09, 2019 10:05 pm
gwentbluebirds wrote:Cardiff dyskinesia wrote:nubbsy wrote:pembroke allan wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Interesting question? She was a British citizen when baby was born but at this moment she is not uk citizen is baby British?
Baby was born whilst she was a UK citizen so I assume the baby still is until they separately revoke citizenship?
Yes apparently it is british because she was still a citizen of UK
I think it's better off staying and rotting with its mother.
The baby has now died of a treatable condition. Has your opinion changed at all?
No. Not being harsh but why should that child be given special treatment when hundreds of others are dying out there for same reason
Sun Mar 10, 2019 12:01 am
Cardiff dyskinesia wrote:gwentbluebirds wrote:Cardiff dyskinesia wrote:nubbsy wrote:pembroke allan wrote:BluebirdWhitchurch wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Interesting question? She was a British citizen when baby was born but at this moment she is not uk citizen is baby British?
Baby was born whilst she was a UK citizen so I assume the baby still is until they separately revoke citizenship?
Yes apparently it is british because she was still a citizen of UK
I think it's better off staying and rotting with its mother.
The baby has now died of a treatable condition. Has your opinion changed at all?
No. Not being harsh but why should that child be given special treatment when hundreds of others are dying out there for same reason
Thanks to the Home Secretary, the baby didn’t have his rights adhered to, never mind special treatment. That child was innocent It’s a new low for this country and some of it’s people