Nuclearblue wrote:Banned on Facebook for this. Still can’t get my nut around Nazi Facebook
northernbluebird wrote:freedom of speech does not apply on a private platform. you have no right to forcibly use a private platform to advance a far right agenda.
it means that the government cannot interfere with your free speech. it is therefore not 'trooly fooked'.
Sneggyblubird wrote:No different to on here really. Mr Tan is innocent I tell ye!
grange_end1927 wrote:Sneggyblubird wrote:No different to on here really. Mr Tan is innocent I tell ye!
Whats Tan done wrong?, mate you seem to have it in for Tan?
northernbluebird wrote:freedom of speech does not apply on a private platform. you have no right to forcibly use a private platform to advance a far right agenda.
True. You have to be a friend of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the IRA if you want to stay on..
it means that the government cannot interfere with your free speech. it is therefore not 'trooly fooked'.
ElyBoy1984 wrote:northernbluebird wrote:freedom of speech does not apply on a private platform. you have no right to forcibly use a private platform to advance a far right agenda.
it means that the government cannot interfere with your free speech. it is therefore not 'trooly fooked'.
The Tyranny of Facebook, pushing it's own agenda. it's not a private business in the way you suggest. It's become a public space with a duty to uphold democracy. Banning Tommy Robinson and the guy above for expressing an opinion.it's pathetic and i hope it back fires.
I don't know enough about TR. But i have seen many peopke dispute that he is far right.
What makes him "far right"?
Nuclearblue wrote:Banned on Facebook for this. Still can’t get my nut around Nazi Facebook
ThomasC wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Banned on Facebook for this. Still can’t get my nut around Nazi Facebook
Using a private company to post bollocks about Tommy Robinson hardly opens the doors to the fascism. Grow up and stop using the platform if you dont agree with its censorship
Tony Blue Williams wrote:ThomasC wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Banned on Facebook for this. Still can’t get my nut around Nazi Facebook
Using a private company to post bollocks about Tommy Robinson hardly opens the doors to the fascism. Grow up and stop using the platform if you dont agree with its censorship
What is the 'bollocks' that is posted about Tommy Robinson?
Jimmykingz wrote:You do seem to have a weird obsession with Mr Yaxley-Lennon
dogfound wrote:Jimmykingz wrote:You do seem to have a weird obsession with Mr Yaxley-Lennon
is pointing out his name is Yaxley Lennon some sort of weapons grade insult in some peoples minds ?
ive noticed its always in lists put on here by people like that IQ67 bloke.
northernbluebird wrote:ElyBoy1984 wrote:northernbluebird wrote:freedom of speech does not apply on a private platform. you have no right to forcibly use a private platform to advance a far right agenda.
it means that the government cannot interfere with your free speech. it is therefore not 'trooly fooked'.
The Tyranny of Facebook, pushing it's own agenda. it's not a private business in the way you suggest. It's become a public space with a duty to uphold democracy. Banning Tommy Robinson and the guy above for expressing an opinion.it's pathetic and i hope it back fires.
I don't know enough about TR. But i have seen many peopke dispute that he is far right.
What makes him "far right"?
there is an argument that the reach of these companies is now so great, that regulation may be necessary.
however, as it stands, as a non governmental organisation, they are not under any obligation to allow people to advance any agenda in the name of free speech, any more than the moderators are compelled to allow ISIS started trying to convert people on here.
why did i use ISIS? it shows how difficult facebook's job is. where to draw the line. but ultimately, they exist not to uphold free speech, but to make money, just like the newspapers and private TV stations.
ElyBoy1984 wrote:northernbluebird wrote:ElyBoy1984 wrote:northernbluebird wrote:freedom of speech does not apply on a private platform. you have no right to forcibly use a private platform to advance a far right agenda.
it means that the government cannot interfere with your free speech. it is therefore not 'trooly fooked'.
The Tyranny of Facebook, pushing it's own agenda. it's not a private business in the way you suggest. It's become a public space with a duty to uphold democracy. Banning Tommy Robinson and the guy above for expressing an opinion.it's pathetic and i hope it back fires.
I don't know enough about TR. But i have seen many peopke dispute that he is far right.
What makes him "far right"?
there is an argument that the reach of these companies is now so great, that regulation may be necessary.
however, as it stands, as a non governmental organisation, they are not under any obligation to allow people to advance any agenda in the name of free speech, any more than the moderators are compelled to allow ISIS started trying to convert people on here.
why did i use ISIS? it shows how difficult facebook's job is. where to draw the line. but ultimately, they exist not to uphold free speech, but to make money, just like the newspapers and private TV stations.
Comparing TR to ISSIS Is fucked in the head.
Users browsing this forum: 7777 glt, Bytespider [Bot], cityone, Clickagy [Bot], FOOTSOLDIER, Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], Handbridge Blue, ias [Bot], pembroke allan, Proximic [Bot], Underhill1927, worcester_ccfc and 224 guests