Page 2 of 2

Re: MY VIEW:HAVE CARDIFF CITY ONCE AGAIN BEEN ROBBED BY POOR

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:56 pm
by bluespeers
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Nowhere near good enough and not a penalty for me.


Which one there were 3 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Agree the first one could have either way but then Gunners was tripped and just before they scored theor 2nd there was a clear hand ball which Dean gave a corner :bluescarf:

Re: MY VIEW:HAVE CARDIFF CITY ONCE AGAIN BEEN ROBBED BY POOR

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 5:19 am
by Gaynor Straight
jimmy_rat wrote:Here's the first handball. Decide for yourselves...

I say definite penalty. Shot was on target. Blocked by an arm. Which he immediately moved behind his back. Something I'd say a guilty conscience might do!!


Compared to the penalty that Man Utd were awarded against PSG the other week, then our first shout should have also been a pen.
The second I'm not too sure off, but the trip on Gunnarson should also have been given.

Re: MY VIEW:HAVE CARDIFF CITY ONCE AGAIN BEEN ROBBED BY POOR

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 7:35 am
by OriginalGrangeEndBlue
bluespeers wrote:
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Nowhere near good enough and not a penalty for me.


Which one there were 3 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Agree the first one could have either way but then Gunners was tripped and just before they scored theor 2nd there was a clear hand ball which Dean gave a corner :bluescarf:


Wind your neck in and read the OP properly as I was answering Annis with regards to the handball incident.

Re: MY VIEW:HAVE CARDIFF CITY ONCE AGAIN BEEN ROBBED BY POOR

Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:01 am
by pembroke allan
Having looked at everything on motd 1st no pen even though shot on target his arms were not stretched out.. 2nd case for and against if ref sees it but as ref didn't see it he should not have overruled his linesman it appears on tv after chat he as decided it was not deliberate as its come off his face onto arm... but the foul on gunners no question a pen he was fouled twice by defender :roll: