Re: Torres off then
Sat Jan 29, 2011 1:36 am
bargoedbluebirds wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9380389.stm
He would have to be replaced and that is easier said than done at this point in the season. Therefore, less likely.
Re: Torres off then
Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:30 am
bargoedbluebirds wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9380389.stm
If you read the story properly, it says that they've turned down his request, much the same as Blackpool with Charlie Adam!
There is however, a supposed £50,000,000 get out clause in his contract, which is still a fair jump from the apparent £35,000,000, which has so far been offered!
Re: Torres off then
Sat Jan 29, 2011 2:48 am
Overthemoon wrote:bargoedbluebirds wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9380389.stm
If you read the story properly, it says that they've turned down his request, much the same as Blackpool with Charlie Adam!
There is however, a supposed £50,000,000 get out clause in his contract, which is still a fair jump from the apparent £35,000,000, which has so far been offered!
...activated on june 1 if they don't qualify for champ's league.
Re: Torres off then
Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:18 am
crazy amounts of money for a player...... world cup winner or not, football's gone mad
Re: Torres off then
Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:24 am
welshdougie wrote:crazy amounts of money for a player...... world cup winner or not, football's gone mad
Football has nothing to do with the money game that is being played. Too many snouts in the trough - players, agents, clubs, key management, regulators - for rational thinking. If the top clubs wanted to force down wage levels, there is much that they could do.