Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:04 am
Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:17 am
Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:34 am
Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:45 am
Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:55 am
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:40 am
ackers1927 wrote:His love for a pint did let him down. But one thing I respect about Hatton is, he took on the top boxers in their prime. Unlike Joe who only fought the big names on their way down or when they got old.
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:45 am
cs_original wrote:ackers1927 wrote:His love for a pint did let him down. But one thing I respect about Hatton is, he took on the top boxers in their prime. Unlike Joe who only fought the big names on their way down or when they got old.
Bit unfair mate
Lacey and Kessler were bang in their prime
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:56 am
boxerbob wrote:cs_original wrote:ackers1927 wrote:His love for a pint did let him down. But one thing I respect about Hatton is, he took on the top boxers in their prime. Unlike Joe who only fought the big names on their way down or when they got old.
Bit unfair mate
Lacey and Kessler were bang in their prime
lacey and kessler were,but i was disappointed with his last 2 opponents he had.there were bigger fights out there than legendry has-beens.i would liked have seen joe fight hopkins n jones in their prime.They would have been more entertaining fights
Fri Apr 15, 2011 1:28 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:37 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:00 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:04 pm
TonyBlues wrote:Hatton?.....very overated.....average at best and shown to be well out of his depth
Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:05 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 3:57 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:43 pm
ccfc_cotta wrote:I've got alot of respect for hatton, unlike other world class boxers he is just an ordinary guy who likes a pint and can let himself go,
but he can still mix it with the best.
he is the one fighter who inspired me you can still enjoy yourself and let yourself go and box to the best of your ability providing tyou give yourself that 2 month break it doesn't all have to be boring strict diet no drinking
Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:08 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 5:20 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:ccfc_cotta wrote:I've got alot of respect for hatton, unlike other world class boxers he is just an ordinary guy who likes a pint and can let himself go,
but he can still mix it with the best.
he is the one fighter who inspired me you can still enjoy yourself and let yourself go and box to the best of your ability providing tyou give yourself that 2 month break it doesn't all have to be boring strict diet no drinking
That is the difference between a very good boxer and a great like Mayweather and Paquio. Had Hatton had the will the Professionalism of those two he may have been a great himself. The truth was he abused his body big time in between fights and you can't do that. And to be honest that was exposed against the above two and Hatton knows that. He made his money but did he fulfill his full potential ? No he didn't. He was game as f**k there is no denying that Chief but should he be looked up to by up and coming boxers ? Definitely not. The all time greats did not in any way abuse there bodies like Hatton and i think he will regret that.
Fri Apr 15, 2011 7:11 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:33 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:45 pm
blackswan wrote:Calzaghe was a homer.Stayed at home and fought WBO mandatory's ^bums*.Only when he knew that he could beat the real greats in the division did he chose to 'get it on' with them.
OK,he beat a overhyped Lacy and looked good doing it,without knocking him out but he took the easy route throughout his career Joe and it will cost him ultimately as he'll never be known as a true great outside of Wales.
As for hatton,well if Joe had his self belief then we might be talking about an all time great.
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:52 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:blackswan wrote:Calzaghe was a homer.Stayed at home and fought WBO mandatory's ^bums*.Only when he knew that he could beat the real greats in the division did he chose to 'get it on' with them.
OK,he beat a overhyped Lacy and looked good doing it,without knocking him out but he took the easy route throughout his career Joe and it will cost him ultimately as he'll never be known as a true great outside of Wales.
As for hatton,well if Joe had his self belief then we might be talking about an all time great.
Sorry Chief i can't agree with your views there. Lacey was the best out there at the time and he was touted as pound for pound best fighter in the world.
Fri Apr 15, 2011 9:56 pm
blackswan wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:blackswan wrote:Calzaghe was a homer.Stayed at home and fought WBO mandatory's ^bums*.Only when he knew that he could beat the real greats in the division did he chose to 'get it on' with them.
OK,he beat a overhyped Lacy and looked good doing it,without knocking him out but he took the easy route throughout his career Joe and it will cost him ultimately as he'll never be known as a true great outside of Wales.
As for hatton,well if Joe had his self belief then we might be talking about an all time great.
Sorry Chief i can't agree with your views there. Lacey was the best out there at the time and he was touted as pound for pound best fighter in the world.
And look at him now,all washed up.Totally over-hyped he was.Check his record and before he fought Joe there's hardly a name on there you'd recognise.Jeff 'Left Hook' Lacy by fook.
Joe's best scalps were Kessler and then Hopkins,who both went on to achieve things after they fought Joe.Lacy went into meltdown.He was useless imo.
Calazghe was a great fighter but he lacked the ego and self belief to be a true Hall of Famer.
Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:07 pm
Fri Apr 15, 2011 10:13 pm
blackswan wrote:Nucleurblue,sorry too many quotes.
True enough,but he could have fought Roy Jones,they were both at their peak around the time.Jones went up and down the weights like a yoyo winning belts,ducking no one along the way.Im sure he'd have fancied a go at Joe.
Frank Warren sculptured Joe's career.He must have made him obscene amounts of money down the years.20 odd defences weren't it? He should have given Robin Reid a rematch but never did.Kessler in Denmark might have been interesting.And even a finale fight against Carl Froch.Now that would have been very interesting.All reasons why i think Joe just falls short of being 'great'.
Just my opinion of course.
Sat Apr 16, 2011 2:13 pm