Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:09 pm
Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:14 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:That we still want to offer massive wages to underrated Players. Give em what they want !! ETC. You only get what your prepared to pay for. And the worst some on here seem to think having Jay back on 14k a week is OK We have just seen three teams go up with modest wages but the difference is they had good honest hard working pros.
That is how we should be heading not paying over rated wannabes obscene wages .
Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:41 pm
Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:50 am
Nuclearblue wrote:That we still want to offer massive wages to underrated Players. Give em what they want !! ETC. You only get what your prepared to pay for. And the worst some on here seem to think having Jay back on 14k a week is OK We have just seen three teams go up with modest wages but the difference is they had good honest hard working pros.
That is how we should be heading not paying over rated wannabes obscene wages .
Thu Jun 02, 2011 6:01 am
Nuclearblue wrote:That we still want to offer massive wages to underrated Players. Give em what they want !! ETC. You only get what your prepared to pay for. And the worst some on here seem to think having Jay back on 14k a week is OK We have just seen three teams go up with modest wages but the difference is they had good honest hard working pros.
That is how we should be heading not paying over rated wannabes obscene wages .
Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:17 am
steve davies wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:That we still want to offer massive wages to underrated Players. Give em what they want !! ETC. You only get what your prepared to pay for. And the worst some on here seem to think having Jay back on 14k a week is OK We have just seen three teams go up with modest wages but the difference is they had good honest hard working pros.
That is how we should be heading not paying over rated wannabes obscene wages .
the other way you could look at it is he just wants the same wage as hudson gets.
if you look at it that way its a fair deal but once again shows the damage ridsdale and jones did to us with their ridiculous wage structure at the club.
Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:33 am
Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:03 am
jamesbarnett91 wrote:I agree. I think we should have a policy of no player on over £8000 pw
then give them win bonuses to play for.
Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:37 am
Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:08 am
Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:15 am
Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:20 am
castleblue wrote:Blackpool refused to pay any player more than £10k per week to play for them in the PL, OK they got relegated but only on the last day of the season.
Both Swansea and Norwich have just won promotion to the PL with an average wage below £8k per week, our club should ship out any player earning above £10k per week and set the new manager a budget of no more than £11m that gives the club a 30 man squad on an average of £7k per week.
Other clubs have been promoted on the same why not ours
Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:25 am
Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:31 am
HarryParsnip wrote:It is ridiculous that chops gets 20k a week , or Hudson 14k a week - neither of them are worth that. So if Jay was on 7k a week , I would take money off them both and reallocate SOME of it to Jay. Jay and Chopra should be on the same wage - they do the same job.
If anything I would ditch Chopra and keep Jay. MC has a drink problem, a gambling problem and an attitude problem (I could cope with all of these IF he wasnt so FAT and if he could actually score some goals on a regular basis)
But he cant - so time to jog on Chops
Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:45 am