Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:26 pm
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:27 pm
bluebird7291 wrote:why is he number 37? yes i know he was number 10 but that was always going to earnie. what made him pick 37?
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:28 pm
bluebird7291 wrote:why is he number 37? yes i know he was number 10 but that was always going to earnie. what made him pick 37?
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:28 pm
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:29 pm
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:29 pm
bluebird7291 wrote:why is he number 37? yes i know he was number 10 but that was always going to earnie. what made him pick 37?
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:32 pm
jezzy666 wrote:bluebird7291 wrote:why is he number 37? yes i know he was number 10 but that was always going to earnie. what made him pick 37?
in about 5 articles and from malkay it says mcphail asked for 37 and the reason being it was his first number at leeds. not doing well to avoid mcphail chat lol
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:35 pm
bluebird7291 wrote:jezzy666 wrote:bluebird7291 wrote:why is he number 37? yes i know he was number 10 but that was always going to earnie. what made him pick 37?
in about 5 articles and from malkay it says mcphail asked for 37 and the reason being it was his first number at leeds. not doing well to avoid mcphail chat lol
mate honestly i do not read the papers and stuff like that there is no point all old news. but it looks like i may be abit behind on that one lol. and atleast i now know. as i was thinking he wasnt in malkys plans.
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:38 pm
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:38 pm
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:40 pm
2blue2handle wrote:I rate mcphail but MM has kiss, cowie and Gunarrson brought in and witts has also been playing central, so we have options.
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:43 pm
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:44 pm
2blue2handle wrote:I think I'd prefer two more wide players.
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:46 pm
bluebird7291 wrote:droppy usually you dont see a number 30 odd playing much UNLESS he has picked the number himself. or you got billions to spend on players thats why i thought that.
plus i havent really been clicking on the McPhail stuff recently for obvious reasons. it was something that was playing on my mind
Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:49 pm
droopy wrote:bluebird7291 wrote:droppy usually you dont see a number 30 odd playing much UNLESS he has picked the number himself. or you got billions to spend on players thats why i thought that.
plus i havent really been clicking on the McPhail stuff recently for obvious reasons. it was something that was playing on my mind
You mean like: -
Craig Bellamy: 39 (last season)
Tom Heaton: 22
Gunnarson: 17
Mason: 20
Ibby Farah: 32
All of the above probably will be in Malky's plan's this year (with the exception of Bellamy so far).
Just because a person hasn't got a squad number in 1-16 does not mean they will not be in the "plans".
However in saying that, I do agree with you about the McPhail situation.