ThomasC wrote:I will stick up for the club on this one. Marshall undoubtedly very popular with City fans and always will be. However, 2.5mill the market value. Could of got a lot more after our relegation, that's where any criticism should stem from if this topic is about getting optimum value
nubbsy wrote:ThomasC wrote:I will stick up for the club on this one. Marshall undoubtedly very popular with City fans and always will be. However, 2.5mill the market value. Could of got a lot more after our relegation, that's where any criticism should stem from if this topic is about getting optimum value
10m they were saying 18 months before. West brom also offered around 6m.
DEANO wrote:FFP is the answer
grange_end1927 wrote:DEANO wrote:FFP is the answer
Mate for doing the deal on those conditions ?
ThomasC wrote:grange_end1927 wrote:DEANO wrote:FFP is the answer
Mate for doing the deal on those conditions ?
what price you put on Marshall then? 2.5 sounds about right after 2 years on from his good PL season
bluebird58 wrote:Marshall was passed his best and worth less than £2.5m when we sold him. We got that money for a reserve team goalkeeper who let in numerous goals when he got his chance, and will be third choice at his club next season. His wages were too high for us and not good value for money. He will always be a legend here, and we certainly enjoyed the best days of his career, but I think the club has done good business and got market value when we sold him.
Some people on here need a reality check.
wez1927 wrote:bluebird58 wrote:Marshall was passed his best and worth less than £2.5m when we sold him. We got that money for a reserve team goalkeeper who let in numerous goals when he got his chance, and will be third choice at his club next season. His wages were too high for us and not good value for money. He will always be a legend here, and we certainly enjoyed the best days of his career, but I think the club has done good business and got market value when we sold him.
Some people on here need a reality check.
Agree
pembroke allan wrote:A player is only worth what a club is willing to pay? And don't recall lots of clubs bidding for his services, so that must tell you something about things! And not sure why fans on here are moaning about regarding the deal as it was in public domain what the contract was when sold!
grange_end1927 wrote:ThomasC wrote:grange_end1927 wrote:DEANO wrote:FFP is the answer
Mate for doing the deal on those conditions ?
what price you put on Marshall then? 2.5 sounds about right after 2 years on from his good PL season
Mate at the time he was worth 5-6million, cost us more in replacements
ThomasC wrote:I will stick up for the club on this one. Marshall undoubtedly very popular with City fans and always will be. However, 2.5mill the market value. Could of got a lot more after our relegation, that's where any criticism should stem from if this topic is about getting optimum value
bluebird58 wrote:Marshall was passed his best and worth less than £2.5m when we sold him. We got that money for a reserve team goalkeeper who let in numerous goals when he got his chance, and will be third choice at his club next season. His wages were too high for us and not good value for money. He will always be a legend here, and we certainly enjoyed the best days of his career, but I think the club has done good business and got market value when we sold him.
Some people on here need a reality check.
Users browsing this forum: davids, DotBot [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Proximic [Bot], YM Bluebird and 170 guests