LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

A forum for all things Cardiff City

LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Postby MalkyandBlueIN » Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:18 pm

Or is he still on trial?

All gone quiet. Hope he signs. Would be quality back up at the very least.
MalkyandBlueIN
 
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:53 pm

LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Advertisement

Advertisement
Login or Register to remove this ad.

Re: LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Postby Blue_Barber » Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:25 pm

He's gone saw him at services as you get on M5 a didn't work out
Blue_Barber
 
Posts: 901
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 4:39 pm
Location: Valleys

Re: LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Postby Ballistic Blue » Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:00 pm

Possibly a backup plan if we couldn't get Tomlin
User avatar
Ballistic Blue
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 8:34 pm

Re: LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Postby TAP_Sheep » Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:48 pm

MalkyandBlueIN wrote:Or is he still on trial?

All gone quiet. Hope he signs. Would be quality back up at the very least.


Not staying on. Was decided when Tomlin became available
TAP_Sheep
 
Posts: 733
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:23 am
Location: Caerphilly

Re: LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Postby JakeBluebird » Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:36 am

Do you think if Noone and Pilks go we would try sign McGugan as replacements for them?
JakeBluebird
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:42 pm

Re: LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Postby worcester_ccfc » Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:40 am

JakeBluebird wrote:Do you think if Noone and Pilks go we would try sign McGugan as replacements for them?


They're wingers, while Pilks can also play as a striker. McGugan is a central midfielder.

I doubt we'll sign him, and I don't mind that.
Vote for your Man of the Match on this forum after every Cardiff City match :ayatollah:

Season ticket holder in Canton 107 :bluebird:

@neddthomas on Twitter.

:bluescarf:
User avatar
worcester_ccfc
Moderator
 
Posts: 22841
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:30 am

Re: LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Postby JakeBluebird » Mon Jul 17, 2017 1:57 pm

worcester_ccfc wrote:
JakeBluebird wrote:Do you think if Noone and Pilks go we would try sign McGugan as replacements for them?


They're wingers, while Pilks can also play as a striker. McGugan is a central midfielder.

I doubt we'll sign him, and I don't mind that.



I'd put Pilks as either an attackig midfielder or striker, I was just thinking if them two leave it would bring that extra depth in the midfield. We are more than capable with the players we have on the wings imo, hoillett and Harris will improve this season and Mendez-Laing will fit in nicely and you can never rule out Matty Kennedy
JakeBluebird
 
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 2:42 pm

Re: LEWIS MCGUGAN NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Postby CaerphillyBluebird15 » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:12 am

JakeBluebird wrote:
worcester_ccfc wrote:
JakeBluebird wrote:Do you think if Noone and Pilks go we would try sign McGugan as replacements for them?


They're wingers, while Pilks can also play as a striker. McGugan is a central midfielder.

I doubt we'll sign him, and I don't mind that.



I'd put Pilks as either an attackig midfielder or striker, I was just thinking if them two leave it would bring that extra depth in the midfield. We are more than capable with the players we have on the wings imo, hoillett and Harris will improve this season and Mendez-Laing will fit in nicely and you can never rule out Matty Kennedy


And Ward will play as a winger IMO we have Zohore and Saadi firing the goals.
Against Modern Football
CaerphillyBluebird15
 
Posts: 3404
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 5:09 pm
Location: Caerphilly



Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bakedalasker, Bluebina, Bytespider [Bot], DotBot [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], ias [Bot], Igovernor, MikeO76, Proximic [Bot], Winchmore Hill Bluebird and 96 guests

Disclaimer :
The views and comments entered in these forums are personal and are not necessarily those of the management of this board.
The management of this board is not responsible for the content of any external internet sites.