CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:I'm thinking we should've cashed in on him!
2blue2handle wrote:Christ people make me laugh, build him up to the point that that he is worth stupid money then knock him back down.
He may need to get a goal but he has been very unlucky not to add to his tally and in the home games I've seen he has been excellent
Steve Zodiak wrote:I think this is another example of people on this forum going completely over the top in the same way they did when we signed Doyle, and then again when we signed Lambert. Zohore had an excellent little spell where in a 4 or 5 month period he managed to get around 10 goals. His stats are not that brilliant really, he has scored around 30 goals in 100 or so games. Some of the valuations put on him were laughable given that suddenly he was the greatest striker ever because he had shown a bit of form over around 20 matches. The reason most of the offers did not match the valuation most of our fans had put on him, was because he had shown a bit of promise and nothing more.
A couple of months of below par performances and lack of goals will not make him a terrible player any more than a couple of months where he hits some good form and scores for fun will not make him a great player. Great strikers worth the sort of figures that some on here were throwing around can score consistently season after season, not just over a handful of games in a 4 month period.
We will find out just how good he is between now and May, and then have a better idea of just how much money he is worth.
top postSteve Zodiak wrote:I think this is another example of people on this forum going completely over the top in the same way they did when we signed Doyle, and then again when we signed Lambert. Zohore had an excellent little spell where in a 4 or 5 month period he managed to get around 10 goals. His stats are not that brilliant really, he has scored around 30 goals in 100 or so games. Some of the valuations put on him were laughable given that suddenly he was the greatest striker ever because he had shown a bit of form over around 20 matches. The reason most of the offers did not match the valuation most of our fans had put on him, was because he had shown a bit of promise and nothing more.
A couple of months of below par performances and lack of goals will not make him a terrible player any more than a couple of months where he hits some good form and scores for fun will not make him a great player. Great strikers worth the sort of figures that some on here were throwing around can score consistently season after season, not just over a handful of games in a 4 month period.
We will find out just how good he is between now and May, and then have a better idea of just how much money he is worth.
stickywicket wrote:I'd take Jay and Chopra anytime
If Kens not careful he@ll be a flash in the pan
Users browsing this forum: Clickagy [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], ias [Bot], Proximic [Bot] and 169 guests