2blue2handle wrote:Goal line technology yes, its a simple goal or no goal and is instant.
The rest of it no for me.
ae15 wrote:I'd agree with having a review system where each manager/captain gets a review a game which is given back if correct. Works brilliantly in cricket and taekwondo actually especially. Thought the system seemed to work okay on Monday but not sure how it will be in more controversial games.
What you will find with VAR is that it will have the ability to drastically change elements of the game. In rugby, we have seen an incredible rise in the number of red cards that are handed out because previously the referee wouldn't see instances of foul play at the time or wouldn't have the courage to give the decision. It'll be interesting to see how the game changes in football as a result.
llangainbluebird wrote:I was against all new technology in football, until being at Reading a few weeks back. Now I'm all for it! As for VAR, not so sure. I follow Serie A, and it has been controversial there. Simone Inzaghi reckons it has cost Lazio 7 points this . Biased, I know, but it's still the ref who makes the final decision. Not always clear cut with penalty decisions, red cards etc. Inzaghi also says that it slows the game down too much.
Probably just stick to goal line technology. Did you see Hibernian's 'goal' at Tynecastle in the recent Edinburgh derby?
DandoCCFC wrote:Goal line technology is good enough for me.
VAR is just having another look at a decision and it will still come to what the ref wants to decide anyway, what's the real difference? It's still what the ref determines in his own eyes. Scrap it.
pembroke allan wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:Goal line technology is good enough for me.
VAR is just having another look at a decision and it will still come to what the ref wants to decide anyway, what's the real difference? It's still what the ref determines in his own eyes. Scrap it.
It would have changed pen decision for wba against arsenal for one thing and sure other decisions would have been changed this season if var in use! It's trying to take away the obvious mistakes that are made, city could have done with it several times this season? :
DandoCCFC wrote:pembroke allan wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:Goal line technology is good enough for me.
VAR is just having another look at a decision and it will still come to what the ref wants to decide anyway, what's the real difference? It's still what the ref determines in his own eyes. Scrap it.
It would have changed pen decision for wba against arsenal for one thing and sure other decisions would have been changed this season if var in use! It's trying to take away the obvious mistakes that are made, city could have done with it several times this season? :
Still comes down to the ref decision, you can't determine if them decisions would be different with VAR.
worcester_ccfc wrote:Seems to work well so far. Was used a couple of times in the Chelsea v Arsenal match tonight and didn’t really disrupt the match.
As for loss of debate, there was still plenty of debate about a VAR decision after it was used on Monday during Brighton v Crystal Palace.
I think it should be brought in. Teams have been relegated, lost titles, lost millions due to bad decisions - VAR will help stop that. Referees are human and will make mistakes, this is the assistance they need.
Nuclearblue wrote:Stop start all the time Scrap it
pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Seems to work well so far. Was used a couple of times in the Chelsea v Arsenal match tonight and didn’t really disrupt the match.
As for loss of debate, there was still plenty of debate about a VAR decision after it was used on Monday during Brighton v Crystal Palace.
I think it should be brought in. Teams have been relegated, lost titles, lost millions due to bad decisions - VAR will help stop that. Referees are human and will make mistakes, this is the assistance they need.
What happens if there's 3 or 4 stoppages in a half like tonight's pen decision? Took around 2 mins to decide? Time is added on at end of half! 2 things as well guidelines say var used for obvious mistake tonight's decision not in slightest a mistake, and as said what if arsenal had scored in the 2 mins var took to decide because game doesn't stop until var makes a decision or ball goes out of play ?
epping blue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Seems to work well so far. Was used a couple of times in the Chelsea v Arsenal match tonight and didn’t really disrupt the match.
As for loss of debate, there was still plenty of debate about a VAR decision after it was used on Monday during Brighton v Crystal Palace.
I think it should be brought in. Teams have been relegated, lost titles, lost millions due to bad decisions - VAR will help stop that. Referees are human and will make mistakes, this is the assistance they need.
What happens if there's 3 or 4 stoppages in a half like tonight's pen decision? Took around 2 mins to decide? Time is added on at end of half! 2 things as well guidelines say var used for obvious mistake tonight's decision not in slightest a mistake, and as said what if arsenal had scored in the 2 mins var took to decide because game doesn't stop until var makes a decision or ball goes out of play ?
I was alarmed at that little sequence. What would have happened to the 2 minutes had the penalty been awarded at that point. Would the 2 minutes be added on and anything in the 2 minutes rescinded ? I had thought they said that once the game continued for a fairly short period it could no longer be brought back and the decision altered. 20 secs would be too much. In 2 minutes anything could happen.
Clearly it will help with the obvious errors and it should deter simulation but as for everything else I think its going to bring more problems than it solves. Getting fans to understand why some decisions are referred and some aren't will be fun.
Where's it going to stop . Just the premier ? FA cup from a certain point ? Just the big clubs with the infrastructure built in. I think Scotland isn't having goal line technology as its too expensive and this probably considerably more.
Users browsing this forum: Bambasbestbuddy22, Bytespider [Bot], Clickagy [Bot], DotBot [Bot], Facebook [Bot], GENERAL CHAT, Google [Bot], ias [Bot], jason perrys legs, Longshot, Proximic [Bot], snoopystorm and 186 guests