maccydee wrote:Care to comment!!!!
Great player.
Bit worried that commentator said 50% sell on clause for Hearts though. Lot of money that will be.
KBK-13 wrote:maccydee wrote:Care to comment!!!!
Great player.
Bit worried that commentator said 50% sell on clause for Hearts though. Lot of money that will be.
15% isn’t it? Paterson insisted on it
2blue2handle wrote:Sounded like 50 on sky.
I've been disappointed by him generally but excellent today, considering the amount of games he has started he has a decent scoring record and a couple of assists. Not sure of his position tho.
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:His second goal was superbly taken. Weaker foot, ball spinning away from him and he guided it expertly into the bottom corner. His overall performance was good as well, although like many others, I'm still wondering what his best position is!
worcester_ccfc wrote:Brilliant today, don’t forget he’s recently come back from a serious injury as well.
maccydee wrote:Care to comment!!!!
Great player.
Bit worried that commentator said 50% sell on clause for Hearts though. Lot of money that will be.
maccydee wrote:Care to comment!!!!
Great player.
Bit worried that commentator said 50% sell on clause for Hearts though. Lot of money that will be.
paulh_85 wrote:Not man of the match for me
llan bluebird wrote:Was there any real criticism ? He is a wingback, but not this season
maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Was there any real criticism ? He is a wingback, but not this season
Definitely was. After the Preston game.
nubbsy wrote:maccydee wrote:Care to comment!!!!
Great player.
Bit worried that commentator said 50% sell on clause for Hearts though. Lot of money that will be.
Hands up I said he's not a midfielder, our midfield had lots of space today and he had a great game. Whether he can do the job there consistently well see!
Tony Blue Williams wrote:nubbsy wrote:maccydee wrote:Care to comment!!!!
Great player.
Bit worried that commentator said 50% sell on clause for Hearts though. Lot of money that will be.
Hands up I said he's not a midfielder, our midfield had lots of space today and he had a great game. Whether he can do the job there consistently well see!
In fairness I would have looked good playing against Sunderland's midfield
If he shines like he did today against the better teams (or even Mansfield ) then we know we have a player on our hands.
paulh_85 wrote:maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Was there any real criticism ? He is a wingback, but not this season
Definitely was. After the Preston game.
After the game he was shit in you mean?
maccydee wrote:paulh_85 wrote:maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Was there any real criticism ? He is a wingback, but not this season
Definitely was. After the Preston game.
After the game he was shit in you mean?
But Wankers picked one bad game to say he was shit as opposed to having an off day
nubbsy wrote:maccydee wrote:paulh_85 wrote:maccydee wrote:llan bluebird wrote:Was there any real criticism ? He is a wingback, but not this season
Definitely was. After the Preston game.
After the game he was shit in you mean?
But Wankers picked one bad game to say he was shit as opposed to having an off day
Wankers?
He has looked out of position a few times this season.
I haven't heard any personal attacks or unfair criticism, just that people thought he was playing in the wrong position or that he needs a pre-season to coach him into a new role. Something I still stand by until he puts the performances in consistently against decent opposition.
He has a good game against bottom of the league and your calling all those people wankers? I think you've showed us who the wanker is!
Users browsing this forum: DotBot [Bot], Google [Bot], Magpie [Bot], Proximic [Bot] and 190 guests