Crayfish wrote:How long is this ridiculous nonsense that we were 33-1 to get promoted before the season started going to be repeated. We were only about 25-1 to actually win the league and about 7-1 to finish in the top six. We were never 33-1 to be promoted. Has anyone got any evidence that any bookie was affering these odds?
Crayfish wrote:How long is this ridiculous nonsense that we were 33-1 to get promoted before the season started going to be repeated. We were only about 25-1 to actually win the league and about 7-1 to finish in the top six. We were never 33-1 to be promoted. Has anyone got any evidence that any bookie was affering these odds?
BEEP AHM wrote:Crayfish wrote:How long is this ridiculous nonsense that we were 33-1 to get promoted before the season started going to be repeated. We were only about 25-1 to actually win the league and about 7-1 to finish in the top six. We were never 33-1 to be promoted. Has anyone got any evidence that any bookie was affering these odds?
never 33/1 - correct
trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Nevermind the relegation odds, I heard we are 2000/1 to win the league next season. Surely worth a quid!
troobloo3339 wrote:Just to put some semblance on the odds to stay up
Huddersfield were 5 to 6 to stay up at the start of last season
Also seams a lot of people don't understand betting odds
33 to 1 was available but that price was to win the league and you could bet each way which pays out on first three places 33 to 1 for first and quarter the odds for second and third
So thats 8 and three quarters to 1 but as each way bets have double stake ie £10 ew costs £20
As we finished 2nd the return on your £10 each way at 33 to 1 would be £97.50 for your £20
This is in fact odds of 3 and three quarters to 1
Pembroke it does matter to some if not you
I've stopped counting how many times false figures are expressed on here about many things
pembroke allan wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Just to put some semblance on the odds to stay up
Huddersfield were 5 to 6 to stay up at the start of last season
Also seams a lot of people don't understand betting odds
33 to 1 was available but that price was to win the league and you could bet each way which pays out on first three places 33 to 1 for first and quarter the odds for second and third
So thats 8 and three quarters to 1 but as each way bets have double stake ie £10 ew costs £20
As we finished 2nd the return on your £10 each way at 33 to 1 would be £97.50 for your £20
This is in fact odds of 3 and three quarters to 1
Pembroke it does matter to some if not you
I've stopped counting how many times false figures are expressed on here about many things
Agree about false figures I'm one of worst as only use rough figures, but my point is something that ended 9mnths ago doesn't matter now does it?? And you added credence that there was a 33/1 odds but people asking for evidence to prove it was 33/1 but don't provide evidence that there wasn't 33/1 odds isn't a balanced view.
troobloo3339 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Just to put some semblance on the odds to stay up
Huddersfield were 5 to 6 to stay up at the start of last season
Also seams a lot of people don't understand betting odds
33 to 1 was available but that price was to win the league and you could bet each way which pays out on first three places 33 to 1 for first and quarter the odds for second and third
So thats 8 and three quarters to 1 but as each way bets have double stake ie £10 ew costs £20
As we finished 2nd the return on your £10 each way at 33 to 1 would be £97.50 for your £20
This is in fact odds of 3 and three quarters to 1
Pembroke it does matter to some if not you
I've stopped counting how many times false figures are expressed on here about many things
Agree about false figures I'm one of worst as only use rough figures, but my point is something that ended 9mnths ago doesn't matter now does it?? And you added credence that there was a 33/1 odds but people asking for evidence to prove it was 33/1 but don't provide evidence that there wasn't 33/1 odds isn't a balanced view.
No I did not add credence that 33 to 1odds TO GAIN PROMOTION WAS AVAILABLE youve just proved my point about people not understanding betting odds 33to1odds were only available TO WIN THE CHAMPIONSHIP 2 totally different bets
troobloo3339 wrote:Just to put some semblance on the odds to stay up
Huddersfield were 5 to 6 to stay up at the start of last season
Also seams a lot of people don't understand betting odds
33 to 1 was available but that price was to win the league and you could bet each way which pays out on first three places 33 to 1 for first and quarter the odds for second and third
So thats 8 and three quarters to 1 but as each way bets have double stake ie £10 ew costs £20
As we finished 2nd the return on your £10 each way at 33 to 1 would be £97.50 for your £20
This is in fact odds of 3 and three quarters to 1
Pembroke it does matter to some if not you
I've stopped counting how many times false figures are expressed on here about many things
T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Nevermind the relegation odds, I heard we are 2000/1 to win the league next season. Surely worth a quid!
neathbluebird wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Nevermind the relegation odds, I heard we are 2000/1 to win the league next season. Surely worth a quid!
Seem to remember Leicester were about that when they did it
TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
T1JMO wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
1. No need to SHOUT
2. Stating FACT at the end of a sentence usually means you are wrong.
3. I think we are on about automatic promotion, my dad had around 30-1 for top 2.
CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:T1JMO wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
1. No need to SHOUT
2. Stating FACT at the end of a sentence usually means you are wrong.
3. I think we are on about automatic promotion, my dad had around 30-1 for top 2.
It was 33/1 to win the league not to be promoted
TopCat CCFC wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:T1JMO wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
1. No need to SHOUT
2. Stating FACT at the end of a sentence usually means you are wrong.
3. I think we are on about automatic promotion, my dad had around 30-1 for top 2.
It was 33/1 to win the league not to be promoted
30-1 for the top 2 ??? need to start betting with that bookie - so you get almost better odds for top 2 than to win the league
???
And i am not wrong - usually .
TopCat CCFC wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:T1JMO wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
1. No need to SHOUT
2. Stating FACT at the end of a sentence usually means you are wrong.
3. I think we are on about automatic promotion, my dad had around 30-1 for top 2.
It was 33/1 to win the league not to be promoted
30-1 for the top 2 ??? need to start betting with that bookie - so you get almost better odds for top 2 than to win the league
???
And i am not wrong - usually .
troobloo3339 wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:T1JMO wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
1. No need to SHOUT
2. Stating FACT at the end of a sentence usually means you are wrong.
3. I think we are on about automatic promotion, my dad had around 30-1 for top 2.
It was 33/1 to win the league not to be promoted
30-1 for the top 2 ??? need to start betting with that bookie - so you get almost better odds for top 2 than to win the league
???
And i am not wrong - usually .
Agree
CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:T1JMO wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:T1JMO wrote:trotskie wrote:33/1 is correct. I got these odds with skybet.
The odds do vary a bit with different bookies at different times, we were defo 33-1 at one point.
CARDIFF WERE BEST ODDS 9-1 TO BE PROMOTED - FACT
1. No need to SHOUT
2. Stating FACT at the end of a sentence usually means you are wrong.
3. I think we are on about automatic promotion, my dad had around 30-1 for top 2.
It was 33/1 to win the league not to be promoted
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests