worcester_ccfc wrote:I can’t understand why.
It was a clear red and we have no chance of having it overturned.
worcester_ccfc wrote:I can’t understand why.
It was a clear red and we have no chance of having it overturned.
Mr Moo Cow wrote:It was cynical but not dangerous
A yellow for me but cant see it being overturned .......On the bright side gives someone else a chance now
oohahhPaulMillar wrote:Mr Moo Cow wrote:It was cynical but not dangerous
A yellow for me but cant see it being overturned .......On the bright side gives someone else a chance now
Not sure that it wasn’t dangerous.. knee high deliberate tackle while a player was in full flight?? Could have caused a considerable amount of damage
Definite red for me.
worcester_ccfc wrote:I can’t understand why.
It was a clear red and we have no chance of having it overturned.
avondaleblue wrote:I agree that it was cynical and Ralls should have tugged his shirt, but in my opinion it was never a challenge to cause serious injury as the law states it has to be brutal or potential to cause serious injury, and I saw a far more dangerous tackle likely to cause serious injury by Danny Ings in their game with Chelsea yesterday, and he only got a yellow card. He was late and over the ball catching the Chelsea player above the ankle, so that in my view was a far worse tackle than Ralls did. There again Mike Dean does like to be controversial.
Elwood Blues wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:I can’t understand why.
It was a clear red and we have no chance of having it overturned.
Mark Halsey doesn't agree with you.
Neither do I.
A clear yellow certainly
avondaleblue wrote:I agree that it was cynical and Ralls should have tugged his shirt, but in my opinion it was never a challenge to cause serious injury as the law states it has to be brutal or potential to cause serious injury, and I saw a far more dangerous tackle likely to cause serious injury by Danny Ings in their game with Chelsea yesterday, and he only got a yellow card. He was late and over the ball catching the Chelsea player above the ankle, so that in my view was a far worse tackle than Ralls did. There again Mike Dean does like to be controversial.
worcester_ccfc wrote:Elwood Blues wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:I can’t understand why.
It was a clear red and we have no chance of having it overturned.
Mark Halsey doesn't agree with you.
Neither do I.
A clear yellow certainly
The vast majority do agree with me though.
Not a chance will this be overturned, just a complete waste of everyone’s time.
pembroke allan wrote:Will depend on dean's report as to wether it's rescinded?
But seeing it again it won't be rescinded as was reckless and dangerous despite what NW says! As for the yellow Dean wa suppose to be reaching for? He just put hands behind back taking time and appeared to be taking advice from 4th official or lino.
Elwood Blues wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Elwood Blues wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:I can’t understand why.
It was a clear red and we have no chance of having it overturned.
Mark Halsey doesn't agree with you.
Neither do I.
A clear yellow certainly
The vast majority do agree with me though.
Not a chance will this be overturned, just a complete waste of everyone’s time.
Vast majority of who?
avondaleblue wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Will depend on dean's report as to wether it's rescinded?
But seeing it again it won't be rescinded as was reckless and dangerous despite what NW says! As for the yellow Dean wa suppose to be reaching for? He just put hands behind back taking time and appeared to be taking advice from 4th official or lino.
He was only a few yards away himself, if he needs advice from the lino and 4th official, he really should not be on the pitch himself!
worcester_ccfc wrote:Elwood Blues wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Elwood Blues wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:I can’t understand why.
It was a clear red and we have no chance of having it overturned.
Mark Halsey doesn't agree with you.
Neither do I.
A clear yellow certainly
The vast majority do agree with me though.
Not a chance will this be overturned, just a complete waste of everyone’s time.
Vast majority of who?
Vast majority of fans, of pundits etc.
Users browsing this forum: Bluebird-in-Jackland, bluebirdoct1962, Clickagy [Bot], davids, Facebook [Bot], Google [Bot], Grapeshot [Bot], Igovernor, oakenagen53 and 168 guests