Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:39 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:40 pm
AladdinSane wrote:Had Ralls already been on a yellow do you think he would have just got a second or still the straight red? Just a thought.
Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:50 pm
CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:Never a red. f*cking soft the lot of you.
Mon Oct 08, 2018 3:51 pm
dogfound wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:Never a red. f*cking soft the lot of you.
im gobsmacked at how many on here cant see the difference between a wreckless two footed studs showing tackle , and what Joe did..
worse is some of them have claimed time and time again to have played the game..
Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:15 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:19 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:33 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:41 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:53 pm
montyblue wrote:Ref playing to the baying crowd and all those spurs players and the basking shark big mouth kane how anybody thinks thats a leg braker or a clear goal oppurtunity is beyond me as DOGFOUND said do peoole know the rules on red and yellow refer to manual.
Mon Oct 08, 2018 5:00 pm
CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:dogfound wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:Never a red. f*cking soft the lot of you.
im gobsmacked at how many on here cant see the difference between a wreckless two footed studs showing tackle , and what Joe did..
worse is some of them have claimed time and time again to have played the game..
Its shocking mate. It was a clear trip, not studs contact on the legs at all ( from what I seen).
Perhaps we seen a different tackle!?
Mon Oct 08, 2018 5:01 pm
dogfound wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:dogfound wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:Never a red. f*cking soft the lot of you.
im gobsmacked at how many on here cant see the difference between a wreckless two footed studs showing tackle , and what Joe did..
worse is some of them have claimed time and time again to have played the game..
Its shocking mate. It was a clear trip, not studs contact on the legs at all ( from what I seen).
Perhaps we seen a different tackle!?
one poster saw a thigh high two foot studs up wreckless tackle from behind....and suggested maybe he should have gone for his ankles which would have just got a yellow,
whats shocked me on this is not people saying its red, but that they seem to have heard certain phrases on TV and totally misinterpreted whats meant by those phrases..he aims himself infront not at the Spurs player and i think in doing so takes away wreckless, as for the other stuff its fiction.
Mon Oct 08, 2018 5:13 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 5:29 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 5:31 pm
avondaleblue wrote:If you watch the You tube clip at about 1 min 20secs you can see Mike Dean going to his left back pocket to show a yellow card. But after Harry and his England chums confront him he goes to his right back pocket to show a red card. Don't tell me he was not influenced by the Spurs players. I think that is why Warnock is appealing it because he was about to show a yellow card, unless of course Dean might say "Oh I forgot which pocket was yellow and red, and Harry and his chums reminded me". I agree with Warnock, Lord Harry of England IS a tw*t.
Mon Oct 08, 2018 5:50 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 7:31 pm
Mon Oct 08, 2018 8:26 pm
Sneggyblubird wrote:Even when I first saw it in real time I though it could be a red and was not surprised as like someone else said the ball was long gone so you can't even argue it was badly timed.It was taking one for the team.
Tue Oct 09, 2018 8:54 am
PtB wrote:dogfound wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:dogfound wrote:CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:Never a red. f*cking soft the lot of you.
im gobsmacked at how many on here cant see the difference between a wreckless two footed studs showing tackle , and what Joe did..
worse is some of them have claimed time and time again to have played the game..
Its shocking mate. It was a clear trip, not studs contact on the legs at all ( from what I seen).
Perhaps we seen a different tackle!?
one poster saw a thigh high two foot studs up wreckless tackle from behind....and suggested maybe he should have gone for his ankles which would have just got a yellow,
whats shocked me on this is not people saying its red, but that they seem to have heard certain phrases on TV and totally misinterpreted whats meant by those phrases..he aims himself infront not at the Spurs player and i think in doing so takes away wreckless, as for the other stuff its fiction.
Spot on.
Tue Oct 09, 2018 8:56 am
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:I’ve had a lot worse tackles on me on the parks without anybody even being booked
But in today’s modern game I think this a red card and we’ll lose the appeal. Worth a go though!
Tue Oct 09, 2018 4:39 pm
CaerphillyBluebird15 wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:I’ve had a lot worse tackles on me on the parks without anybody even being booked
But in today’s modern game I think this a red card and we’ll lose the appeal. Worth a go though!
I make these kind of tackles every week ( sunday league ) But I would be furious if I had a red for this.
Reffing standard is miles and miles ahead of parks football so they SHOULD know the rules better.