Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 9:28 am

WOL Tom Colman wrote that Cardiff youngsters looked uncomfortable against Bournemouth.
There were on 2 youngsters in the starting 11. Sang and Harris.
What is he talking about, it was not the youngsters who did not perform, the worst players on the pitch were Bacuna, Pack and by far the worst was Vaulks.
Our midfield had no clue how to pass the ball other than to lump it forward. This is something MM has to sort out ASAP.

Re: Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 10:00 am

Blueberry Jam wrote:WOL Tom Colman wrote that Cardiff youngsters looked uncomfortable against Bournemouth.
There were on 2 youngsters in the starting 11. Sang and Harris.
What is he talking about, it was not the youngsters who did not perform, the worst players on the pitch were Bacuna, Pack and by far the worst was Vaulks.
Our midfield had no clue how to pass the ball other than to lump it forward. This is something MM has to sort out ASAP.


Lets be honest Media Wales reporters have got worse the last few seasons.

Absolutely shocking.

Re: Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 10:20 am

I thought Bagan and Colwell added a new impetus when that came on.

Re: Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 10:24 am

stickywicket wrote:I thought Bagan and Colwell added a new impetus when that came on.




And i did :thumbright: :bluebird:

Re: Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 11:04 am

Forever Blue wrote:
stickywicket wrote:I thought Bagan and Colwell added a new impetus when that came on.




And i did :thumbright: :bluebird:


As did Collins this time.

At one point we switched to a back four, no problem. However, that back four consisted of Nelson, Brown, Flint and Morrison, all of whom are centre backs :banghead:

If you're going to switch to a back four surely you keep Sang on and replace one of the centre backs with Bagan ? Really strange thinking and left us very exposed to the pace that Bournemouth had as well as reducing any chance of overlapping full backs !!!!

Re: Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 11:57 am

stickywicket wrote:I thought Bagan and Colwell added a new impetus when that came on.


Definitely. The only time we managed to string a few passes together and get a ball into the box was when bagan and colwill linked up down the left.

Re: Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 2:37 pm

to be fair I thought sang got caught out a few times in the first half but not to rule anyone out as everyone was pretty poor

Re: Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 7:23 pm

piledriver64 wrote:
Forever Blue wrote:
stickywicket wrote:I thought Bagan and Colwell added a new impetus when that came on.




And i did :thumbright: :bluebird:


As did Collins this time.

At one point we switched to a back four, no problem. However, that back four consisted of Nelson, Brown, Flint and Morrison, all of whom are centre backs :banghead:

If you're going to switch to a back four surely you keep Sang on and replace one of the centre backs with Bagan ? Really strange thinking and left us very exposed to the pace that Bournemouth had as well as reducing any chance of overlapping full backs !!!!



Mick loves to have big defenders and wouldn't dream of replacing Morrison or flint during game ......musnt forget he refused take Moore off because he wanted him as a defender for corners "his words"

Re: Tom Colman

Mon Sep 20, 2021 8:34 pm

stickywicket wrote:I thought Bagan and Colwell added a new impetus when that came on.

Yes they bloody did !! :thumbup: