Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:40 pm
Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:52 pm
Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:54 pm
SB 1927 wrote:2023's annual report says our turnover was £26M, based your figures is just shy of 20% of our turnover. When operating at a reported loss, it'd be significant.
Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:56 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:Seen a few saying it would really hurt Tan if fans boycotted the games because of the financial impact.
So I decided to do a bit of maths on it - not entirely accurate, but it gives you an idea.
Let's say we have around 12,000 season ticket holders and they each pay £400. That brings in just under 209k per game. Of course some season tickets are cheaper than that and a few more expensive. But this is just a rough number.
For the sake of argument, say there's 6,000 who buy individual tickets for a game. That's 180,000 per game. Again, this is a rough number.
That would bring in just under £5m over the season.
Our wage bill on some sites is estimated at about £392k per week for the playing staff.
So that £5m equates to the wages for three months - that's it.
These numbers are also based on whether 100% of fans wouldn't go to games. That's just not going to happen, it would be more like 30% maximum. Season tickets are already paid for so they wouldn't impact anything until next season.
It is not a great deal of money for the club.
Tan can get that money another way, such as another loan.
So all that boycotting games would achieve is fans kicking themselves in the foot.
The other thing it would do is encourage Tan to cost cut even more, putting the club in an even worse state and just getting by day to day as a business.
Robertson and Daland supposedly cost us around £5m between them. You can say goodbye to signings like that.
It is not the answer and helps nobody.
Fri Nov 29, 2024 6:59 pm
montyblue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Seen a few saying it would really hurt Tan if fans boycotted the games because of the financial impact.
So I decided to do a bit of maths on it - not entirely accurate, but it gives you an idea.
Let's say we have around 12,000 season ticket holders and they each pay £400. That brings in just under 209k per game. Of course some season tickets are cheaper than that and a few more expensive. But this is just a rough number.
For the sake of argument, say there's 6,000 who buy individual tickets for a game. That's 180,000 per game. Again, this is a rough number.
That would bring in just under £5m over the season.
Our wage bill on some sites is estimated at about £392k per week for the playing staff.
So that £5m equates to the wages for three months - that's it.
These numbers are also based on whether 100% of fans wouldn't go to games. That's just not going to happen, it would be more like 30% maximum. Season tickets are already paid for so they wouldn't impact anything until next season.
It is not a great deal of money for the club.
Tan can get that money another way, such as another loan.
So all that boycotting games would achieve is fans kicking themselves in the foot.
The other thing it would do is encourage Tan to cost cut even more, putting the club in an even worse state and just getting by day to day as a business.
Robertson and Daland supposedly cost us around £5m between them. You can say goodbye to signings like that.
It is not the answer and helps nobody.
The best way is for the stadium be full to capacity on a live coverage game on sky tv and everybody brings a banner with tan out ,
can you imagine that full the canton end,
and continious chanting against the board througout the game.
Putting up a banner outside the ground and chanting outside the stadium is going to do f.ck all,
its infront of the cameras visible and loud
that should rattle Tans cage
but we need a full stadium to cheer on the team at the same time .
staying away as a protest is happening now and who the f.ck is taking any notice
Fri Nov 29, 2024 7:08 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:montyblue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Seen a few saying it would really hurt Tan if fans boycotted the games because of the financial impact.
So I decided to do a bit of maths on it - not entirely accurate, but it gives you an idea.
Let's say we have around 12,000 season ticket holders and they each pay £400. That brings in just under 209k per game. Of course some season tickets are cheaper than that and a few more expensive. But this is just a rough number.
For the sake of argument, say there's 6,000 who buy individual tickets for a game. That's 180,000 per game. Again, this is a rough number.
That would bring in just under £5m over the season.
Our wage bill on some sites is estimated at about £392k per week for the playing staff.
So that £5m equates to the wages for three months - that's it.
These numbers are also based on whether 100% of fans wouldn't go to games. That's just not going to happen, it would be more like 30% maximum. Season tickets are already paid for so they wouldn't impact anything until next season.
It is not a great deal of money for the club.
Tan can get that money another way, such as another loan.
So all that boycotting games would achieve is fans kicking themselves in the foot.
The other thing it would do is encourage Tan to cost cut even more, putting the club in an even worse state and just getting by day to day as a business.
Robertson and Daland supposedly cost us around £5m between them. You can say goodbye to signings like that.
It is not the answer and helps nobody.
The best way is for the stadium be full to capacity on a live coverage game on sky tv and everybody brings a banner with tan out ,
can you imagine that full the canton end,
and continious chanting against the board througout the game.
Putting up a banner outside the ground and chanting outside the stadium is going to do f.ck all,
its infront of the cameras visible and loud
that should rattle Tans cage
but we need a full stadium to cheer on the team at the same time .
staying away as a protest is happening now and who the f.ck is taking any notice
Totally agree with that.
Fri Nov 29, 2024 7:30 pm
Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:09 pm
Merthyrfunhouse wrote:Be lucky to get more than couple hundred.
Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:16 pm
montyblue wrote:Merthyrfunhouse wrote:Be lucky to get more than couple hundred.
Odd reply?
if your in the canton end you only have to join in with the singing of,
"tan out" hardly taxing the brain.
Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:20 pm
Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:25 pm
montyblue wrote:Merthyrfunhouse wrote:Be lucky to get more than couple hundred.
Odd reply?
if your in the canton end you only have to join in with the singing of,
"tan out" hardly taxing the brain.
Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:37 pm
Merthyrfunhouse wrote:montyblue wrote:Merthyrfunhouse wrote:Be lucky to get more than couple hundred.
Odd reply?
if your in the canton end you only have to join in with the singing of,
"tan out" hardly taxing the brain.
I was referring to boycotting games.
If there was an appetite for any kind of meaningful protest it would have happened by now.
Fri Nov 29, 2024 8:55 pm
montyblue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Seen a few saying it would really hurt Tan if fans boycotted the games because of the financial impact.
So I decided to do a bit of maths on it - not entirely accurate, but it gives you an idea.
Let's say we have around 12,000 season ticket holders and they each pay £400. That brings in just under 209k per game. Of course some season tickets are cheaper than that and a few more expensive. But this is just a rough number.
For the sake of argument, say there's 6,000 who buy individual tickets for a game. That's 180,000 per game. Again, this is a rough number.
That would bring in just under £5m over the season.
Our wage bill on some sites is estimated at about £392k per week for the playing staff.
So that £5m equates to the wages for three months - that's it.
These numbers are also based on whether 100% of fans wouldn't go to games. That's just not going to happen, it would be more like 30% maximum. Season tickets are already paid for so they wouldn't impact anything until next season.
It is not a great deal of money for the club.
Tan can get that money another way, such as another loan.
So all that boycotting games would achieve is fans kicking themselves in the foot.
The other thing it would do is encourage Tan to cost cut even more, putting the club in an even worse state and just getting by day to day as a business.
Robertson and Daland supposedly cost us around £5m between them. You can say goodbye to signings like that.
It is not the answer and helps nobody.
The best way is for the stadium be full to capacity on a live coverage game on sky tv and everybody brings a banner with tan out ,
can you imagine that full the canton end,
and continious chanting against the board througout the game.
Putting up a banner outside the ground and chanting outside the stadium is going to do f.ck all,
its infront of the cameras visible and loud
that should rattle Tans cage
but we need a full stadium to cheer on the team at the same time .
staying away as a protest is happening now and who the f.ck is taking any notice
Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:01 pm
Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:06 pm
Roath_Blue wrote:montyblue wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Seen a few saying it would really hurt Tan if fans boycotted the games because of the financial impact.
So I decided to do a bit of maths on it - not entirely accurate, but it gives you an idea.
Let's say we have around 12,000 season ticket holders and they each pay £400. That brings in just under 209k per game. Of course some season tickets are cheaper than that and a few more expensive. But this is just a rough number.
For the sake of argument, say there's 6,000 who buy individual tickets for a game. That's 180,000 per game. Again, this is a rough number.
That would bring in just under £5m over the season.
Our wage bill on some sites is estimated at about £392k per week for the playing staff.
So that £5m equates to the wages for three months - that's it.
These numbers are also based on whether 100% of fans wouldn't go to games. That's just not going to happen, it would be more like 30% maximum. Season tickets are already paid for so they wouldn't impact anything until next season.
It is not a great deal of money for the club.
Tan can get that money another way, such as another loan.
So all that boycotting games would achieve is fans kicking themselves in the foot.
The other thing it would do is encourage Tan to cost cut even more, putting the club in an even worse state and just getting by day to day as a business.
Robertson and Daland supposedly cost us around £5m between them. You can say goodbye to signings like that.
It is not the answer and helps nobody.
The best way is for the stadium be full to capacity on a live coverage game on sky tv and everybody brings a banner with tan out ,
can you imagine that full the canton end,
and continious chanting against the board througout the game.
Putting up a banner outside the ground and chanting outside the stadium is going to do f.ck all,
its infront of the cameras visible and loud
that should rattle Tans cage
but we need a full stadium to cheer on the team at the same time .
staying away as a protest is happening now and who the f.ck is taking any notice
Completely agree monty
Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:11 pm
Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:33 pm
skiprat wrote:The boycotts started already .crowds are dropping and will get worse unless we drastically improve and I don't see any signs of that happening
Fri Nov 29, 2024 9:39 pm
Sat Nov 30, 2024 10:53 am
montyblue wrote:skiprat wrote:The boycotts started already .crowds are dropping and will get worse unless we drastically improve and I don't see any signs of that happening
Yes fans have been worn down by shit teams managers crap loans for season after season ,
tonights attendance at wales women's game was given as 16,000 that was the figure given for or game mid week against QPR
i said it was b.ll.cks there less than half the crowd compared to tonights wales women
Fans sadly have given up and are not prepared to do anything they are accepting relagation.
Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:10 am
Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:40 am
Sat Nov 30, 2024 1:38 pm
Wed Dec 04, 2024 11:57 am
bluebird04 wrote:it won't happen, Think it was the Norwich game, Dalman and Choo both there, I was in the back of the canton, tried the "we want you to go, Mehmet Dalman, we want you to go" I had a few weird looks, but no one was bothered to join in.