' CARDIFF CITY TRAINING GROUND ? '

I have had a text saying that the training ground at the Vale has not received planning permission, apparently there was something in the Echo today.

Did anyone else see it, is it correct as I have seen nothing online.

only this in feb


http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales ... ng-6754808

only this in feb


http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales ... ng-6754808

Nothing online today but in today's paper my mate says it claims planning application has not been approved still.

I have had a text saying that the training ground at the Vale has not received planning permission, apparently there was something in the Echo today.

Did anyone else see it, is it correct as I have seen nothing online.

There were of local protests and the permission knocked back for review.

Page 28 of today's Echo, if anyone got a copy.

Carl it has not been turned down all it says is that the application will not go before the planning committee till after the councils summer recess, because all the plans that city have put in have not been finished looking at

I have had a text saying that the training ground at the Vale has not received planning permission, apparently there was something in the Echo today.

Did anyone else see it, is it correct as I have seen nothing online.

Hi Carl, the planning application has not gone before the final planning committee.

They are still co-operating with the Vale of Glamorgan council as they require further clarification on certain bits of information. (This is from what I have heard) In terms of how long this takes; no one is quite sure.

At the moment Cardiff City have provided the following documents:

- Planning Drawings
- Design, Access and Sustainability
- Ecology Report
- Site Notice
- Archaeological Field Evaluation Specification
- Details of ground investigation
- Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment

From what I can gather at the moment, Cardiff need to provide information on the following in order to progress the application: -

- Flood Zone documents
- Surface Water More
- Surface Water Immediate
- Surface Water Less

But I have come across some of the planning designs etc.

I have attached some of them so you can see below.

-

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Some stuck up snobs in the area don't want it built and they have been complaining about it

Some stuck up snobs in the area don't want it built and they have been complaining about it

I know the locals are talking about it spoiling a view but I thought it was near enough on the same site as all the other training developments that are on the hotel site.

There is just a single row of terraced houses in the village or ate the complaints coming from the posh new detached houses that are built in the grounds of the hotel.

But I thought to many a poster on here Vincent Tan wasn't upholding his promises???? can we just use this to reinforce the point that he is and the work is being done on all fronts, its just the usual bureaucratic back log which is holding this up.

But I thought to many a poster on here Vincent Tan wasn't upholding his promises???? can we just use this to reinforce the point that he is and the work is being done on all fronts, its just the usual bureaucratic back log which is holding this up.

NO ONE has questioned VT in this post so why bring it up.

We've got people battering him for things he hasn't done and now we have you fighting his corner in a post where he has not even been mentioned.

But I thought to many a poster on here Vincent Tan wasn't upholding his promises???? can we just use this to reinforce the point that he is and the work is being done on all fronts, its just the usual bureaucratic back log which is holding this up.

NO ONE has questioned VT in this post so why bring it up.

We've got people battering him for things he hasn't done and now we have you fighting his corner in a post where he has not even been mentioned.

that's exactly my point. people have been battering him far too often; accusing him of not doing things he's promised and calling him a liar. This is evidence that he is carrying out his promises and that should be recognised!

Just because he's carrying on with one promise, doesn't mean he's doing them all.

Just because he's carrying on with one promise, doesn't mean he's doing them all.

Who's that click clacking over my bridge? oh, there you are!

Just because he's carrying on with one promise, doesn't mean he's doing them all.

Who's that click clacking over my bridge? oh, there you are!

Be fair, you did lay the bait. It was all going swimmingly before that.

Just because he's carrying on with one promise, doesn't mean he's doing them all.

Who's that click clacking over my bridge? oh, there you are!

Be fair, you did lay the bait. It was all going swimmingly before that.

I don't mind debating except Chuckles doesn't debate; just trolls and derails.

But I thought to many a poster on here Vincent Tan wasn't upholding his promises???? can we just use this to reinforce the point that he is and the work is being done on all fronts, its just the usual bureaucratic back log which is holding this up.

Well done on wrecking another thread you f*cking boring dickhead.

But I thought to many a poster on here Vincent Tan wasn't upholding his promises???? can we just use this to reinforce the point that he is and the work is being done on all fronts, its just the usual bureaucratic back log which is holding this up.

Well done on wrecking another thread you f*cking boring dickhead.

Someone got out on the wrong side of the bed this morning!

I don't mind debating except Chuckles doesn't debate; just trolls and derails.

The irony being that you derailed this thread & have refused any sort of debate.

I don't mind debating except Chuckles doesn't debate; just trolls and derails.

The irony being that you derailed this thread & have refused any sort of debate.

Nope, I responded to Wayne S, just chose not to with you because of the above!

But I thought to many a poster on here Vincent Tan wasn't upholding his promises???? can we just use this to reinforce the point that he is and the work is being done on all fronts, its just the usual bureaucratic back log which is holding this up.

Well done on wrecking another thread you f*cking boring dickhead.

Someone got out on the wrong side of the bed this morning!

Why were you unbanned your a pointless person go watch a wrestling DVD or something you dribbling mess.

Just because he's carrying on with one promise, doesn't mean he's doing them all.

Alex, Tan certainly has not done debt to equity as promised 2 years ago.

Alex, Tan certainly has not done debt to equity as promised 2 years ago.

Funnily enough, it's the biggest one of the lot too... The one most people begrudgingly accepted his horrific rebrand for.

But I thought to many a poster on here Vincent Tan wasn't upholding his promises???? can we just use this to reinforce the point that he is and the work is being done on all fronts, its just the usual bureaucratic back log which is holding this up.

Well done on wrecking another thread you f*cking boring dickhead.

Someone got out on the wrong side of the bed this morning!

Why were you unbanned your a pointless person go watch a wrestling DVD or something you dribbling mess.

Because there were not justifiable ground for banning me.

I've got plenty of points, in fact I've got years of experience of pointing and my fingers are quite good at it. But don't use your middle finger though, that's naughty! But see, here's some pointing can't forget this one either

And hey, I'm not the best football player in the world but I wouldn't say my dribbling was a mess. Oh, it's Sky+ I use as well, not DVDs.

Just because he's carrying on with one promise, doesn't mean he's doing them all.

Alex, Tan certainly has not done debt to equity as promised 2 years ago.

But, that's doesn't mean he has failed to keep the promise. There's a subtle but very important difference. One is he will not and never intends to and has deliberately mislead the fans, the other means he has of yet has just not fulfilled it yet (which doesn't mean he won't).

Squad investment - check
Training round - being checked
Stadium Expansion - check
Debt to equity - a little more time but being sorted (check)

But, that's doesn't mean he has failed to keep the promise. There's a subtle but very important difference. One is he will not and never intends to and has deliberately mislead the fans, the other means he has of yet has just not fulfilled it yet (which doesn't mean he won't).

Squad investment - check
Training round - being checked
Stadium Expansion - check
Debt to equity - a little more time but being sorted (check)

Yet again, you've failed to realise that he has said himself that he won't be transferring all his debt to equity, which was originally promised.

How many times have we heard that the club will be DEBT FREE WITHIN WEEKS... Yet when he fulfills his "promise" the club will still be around 100 million in debt... Far more than when the man joined the club.

THIS is why people are coming around to see that he isn't the saviour that you paint him to be. Long term, the finances of this club look incredibly bleak.

Lets get back on topic.

where gonna have a first class training facility once it gets the go ahead,and it will.You know we're lucky to have a man like VT who gets things done,i know there's a few doom and gloom merchants who's glass is always half empty and they've reared their heads again in this thread.They just can't help themselves.

But, that's doesn't mean he has failed to keep the promise. There's a subtle but very important difference. One is he will not and never intends to and has deliberately mislead the fans, the other means he has of yet has just not fulfilled it yet (which doesn't mean he won't).

Squad investment - check
Training round - being checked
Stadium Expansion - check
Debt to equity - a little more time but being sorted (check)

Yet again, you've failed to realise that he has said himself that he won't be transferring all his debt to equity, which was originally promised.

How many times have we heard that the club will be DEBT FREE WITHIN WEEKS... Yet when he fulfills his "promise" the club will still be around 100 million in debt... Far more than when the man joined the club.

THIS is why people are coming around to see that he isn't the saviour that you paint him to be. Long term, the finances of this club look incredibly bleak.

Still see you're ignoring everything which was yet again explained to you yesterday.

Still no debate then, despite getting upset about others who "don't debate"

Alex, Tan certainly has not done debt to equity as promised 2 years ago.

Funnily enough, it's the biggest one of the lot too... The one most people begrudgingly accepted his horrific rebrand for.

Correct Alex, the biggest promise of them all and the most important one and yet some still stick up for him even though he also divided our club and stripped us of our identity. And guess what after all that were a Championship club,with only 14,000 season tickets sold.