Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:38 am
Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:42 am
Daya wrote:So Carl in fairness was correct, Carl stated a couple of weeks ago that SH was to offer 12 mill, presuming that is correct also, this will be a big test on TG to his future plans i would have thought. Turn it down and go it alone because it doesnt look likely of any other's coming forward with investment for the Club, which is clear needs investment. Thats of course if the offer is actually made. I doubt we will ever know really.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:44 am
Daya wrote:So Carl in fairness was correct, Carl stated a couple of weeks ago that SH was to offer 12 mill, presuming that is correct also, this will be a big test on TG to his future plans i would have thought. Turn it down and go it alone because it doesnt look likely of any other's coming forward with investment for the Club, which is clear needs investment. Thats of course if the offer is actually made. I doubt we will ever know really.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:46 am
Daya wrote:So Carl in fairness was correct, Carl stated a couple of weeks ago that SH was to offer 12 mill, presuming that is correct also, this will be a big test on TG to his future plans i would have thought. Turn it down and go it alone because it doesnt look likely of any other's coming forward with investment for the Club, which is clear needs investment. Thats of course if the offer is actually made. I doubt we will ever know really.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:49 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Daya wrote:So Carl in fairness was correct, Carl stated a couple of weeks ago that SH was to offer 12 mill, presuming that is correct also, this will be a big test on TG to his future plans i would have thought. Turn it down and go it alone because it doesnt look likely of any other's coming forward with investment for the Club, which is clear needs investment. Thats of course if the offer is actually made. I doubt we will ever know really.
There is a good chance a book will be written about it all at sometime, just not now
Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:54 am
Ross Young wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:Daya wrote:So Carl in fairness was correct, Carl stated a couple of weeks ago that SH was to offer 12 mill, presuming that is correct also, this will be a big test on TG to his future plans i would have thought. Turn it down and go it alone because it doesnt look likely of any other's coming forward with investment for the Club, which is clear needs investment. Thats of course if the offer is actually made. I doubt we will ever know really.
There is a good chance a book will be written about it all at sometime, just not now
Have we got anyone who'd be able to write one?
Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:01 am
steve davies wrote:Daya wrote:So Carl in fairness was correct, Carl stated a couple of weeks ago that SH was to offer 12 mill, presuming that is correct also, this will be a big test on TG to his future plans i would have thought. Turn it down and go it alone because it doesnt look likely of any other's coming forward with investment for the Club, which is clear needs investment. Thats of course if the offer is actually made. I doubt we will ever know really.
but steve the malaysians were aware of the debts prior to signing up so why did they not involve sam in those negotiations and due diligence if they wanted a partnership.
most of this is being driven by the i want sam back brigade led by terry phillips and for one i hope they do meet and resolve the issue so that the malaysians can carry on with repairing the damage left by the two previous regimes
i also dont expect sam to be returning to the football club soon
Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:31 am
Daya wrote:steve davies wrote:Daya wrote:So Carl in fairness was correct, Carl stated a couple of weeks ago that SH was to offer 12 mill, presuming that is correct also, this will be a big test on TG to his future plans i would have thought. Turn it down and go it alone because it doesnt look likely of any other's coming forward with investment for the Club, which is clear needs investment. Thats of course if the offer is actually made. I doubt we will ever know really.
but steve the malaysians were aware of the debts prior to signing up so why did they not involve sam in those negotiations and due diligence if they wanted a partnership.
most of this is being driven by the i want sam back brigade led by terry phillips and for one i hope they do meet and resolve the issue so that the malaysians can carry on with repairing the damage left by the two previous regimes
i also dont expect sam to be returning to the football club soon
When they signed up though the Premiership was looming Steve. Theres two ways to look at it,
A. Billionaires take a 6 mill punt ( like us putting 100 quid on red or black)
B. They are in for the long term project.
Time will tell.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:17 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:43 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:50 pm
steve davies wrote:["Daya"][="steve davies"][qDaya"]So Carl in fairness was correct, Carl stated a couple of weeks ago that SH was to offer 12 mill, presuming that is correct also, this will be a big test on TG to his future plans i would have thought. Turn it down and go it alone because it doesnt look likely of any other's coming forward with investment for the Club, which is clear needs investment. Thats of course if the offer is actually made. I doubt we will ever know really.
but steve the malaysians were aware of the debts prior to signing up so why did they not involve sam in those negotiations and due diligence if they wanted a partnership.
most of this is being driven by the i want sam back brigade led by terry phillips and for one i hope they do meet and resolve the issue so that the malaysians can carry on with repairing the damage left by the two previous regimes
i also dont expect sam to be returning to the football club soon
When they signed up though the Premiership was looming Steve. Theres two ways to look at it,
A. Billionaires take a 6 mill punt ( like us putting 100 quid on red or black)
B. They are in for the long term project.
Time will tell.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:00 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 1:02 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:57 pm
Eddie May wrote:I agree with dayo, Carl said Sam would get a meeting with Tg a while back, yes dates cant be guaranteed, bit its happening, yet all people do is have a go at Carl, they dont say well done when he is right which is 98% of the time.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:11 pm
Eddie May wrote:I agree with dayo, Carl said Sam would get a meeting with Tg a while back, yes dates cant be guaranteed, bit its happening, yet all people do is have a go at Carl, they dont say well done when he is right which is 98% of the time.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:34 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:37 pm
steve davies wrote:Eddie May wrote:I agree with dayo, Carl said Sam would get a meeting with Tg a while back, yes dates cant be guaranteed, bit its happening, yet all people do is have a go at Carl, they dont say well done when he is right which is 98% of the time.
Eddie nobody is criticising carl my own personal view is that he and this forum have been used slightly by sam to get a foothold in the front door.
there are threads on here where people are now saying carl annis and gwyn should keep quiet about whats going on but less than a fortnight ago everybody was having their say in the local rag in another terry phillips exclusive interview with sam and members of this forum.
members of this forum also met with sam in london.
the problem is this forum is presenting one side of the coin all the time and that is sams side nobody has approached tg that im aware for his side of the story regarding the langston payments.
can you not see to other posters that its coming across as print what sam wants printed and then keep quiet when sam wants things kept quiet.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:42 pm
Claude Blue wrote:I think that, finally, people are getting the message here.
Certain influencial members of this board have been peddling Hammams rhetoric for some time now. A lot of the negative stuff about the club, particularly around PMG and the CEO, has clearly been orchestrated by Hammams lackies on here. Sadly, some people will do anything to see their hero return and to feel important again.
Self interest, rather than the right thing for our club has caused great division amongst our supporters, the majority of whom can see exactly what has been happening.
I know that the more myopic on here will refuse to accept this and resort to their usual stance but "the truth" will out one day. The usual suspects will say that they know "the truth" when, in fact, the only "truth" they know will be from Sam Hammam!!
It may be time to dig out those "T" shirts again lads
Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:48 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:06 pm
nerd wrote:Claude Blue wrote:I think that, finally, people are getting the message here.
Certain influencial members of this board have been peddling Hammams rhetoric for some time now. A lot of the negative stuff about the club, particularly around PMG and the CEO, has clearly been orchestrated by Hammams lackies on here. Sadly, some people will do anything to see their hero return and to feel important again.
Self interest, rather than the right thing for our club has caused great division amongst our supporters, the majority of whom can see exactly what has been happening.
I know that the more myopic on here will refuse to accept this and resort to their usual stance but "the truth" will out one day. The usual suspects will say that they know "the truth" when, in fact, the only "truth" they know will be from Sam Hammam!!
It may be time to dig out those "T" shirts again lads
Hmm, you're saying PMG are currently investing in the club then?
Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:19 pm
Claude Blue wrote:Where have I said that?
Some months ago I strongly supported the Trusts statement about PMG.
Like the Trust I was villified on here.
Why have so many of you changed your view?
Orders from Hammam perhaps?
Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:20 pm
Lawnmower wrote:nerd wrote:Claude Blue wrote:I think that, finally, people are getting the message here.
Certain influencial members of this board have been peddling Hammams rhetoric for some time now. A lot of the negative stuff about the club, particularly around PMG and the CEO, has clearly been orchestrated by Hammams lackies on here. Sadly, some people will do anything to see their hero return and to feel important again.
Self interest, rather than the right thing for our club has caused great division amongst our supporters, the majority of whom can see exactly what has been happening.
I know that the more myopic on here will refuse to accept this and resort to their usual stance but "the truth" will out one day. The usual suspects will say that they know "the truth" when, in fact, the only "truth" they know will be from Sam Hammam!!
It may be time to dig out those "T" shirts again lads
Hmm, you're saying PMG are currently investing in the club then?
How do you treat the £7-£9m they have loaned to the club and £2-3m worth of shares they own ?
They have 'invested' more than TG & VT at the moment.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:24 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:33 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:50 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:56 pm
How do you treat the £7-£9m they have loaned to the club and £2-3m worth of shares they own ?
They have 'invested' more than TG & VT at the moment.
B. They are in for the long term project.
Time will tell.
Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:08 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:28 pm
The Premier 1 wrote:How do you treat the £7-£9m they have loaned to the club and £2-3m worth of shares they own ?
They have 'invested' more than TG & VT at the moment.
but hav'nt they taken land in part payment for these amounts? if so thats not investment thats a sale/purchase
Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:34 pm
Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:49 pm
Lawnmower wrote:Hmm, you're saying PMG are currently investing in the club then?