Sun Mar 24, 2024 4:39 pm
Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:02 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:It has been suggested recently that VT values his shares in the club at a value of £200m
It has also been suggested that he has received three offers to buy the club at values between £100-150m and this got me thinking, with all the talk of court cases, maybe there is a reason behind his valuation.
In recent days we have learned that the club have lowered their valuation of the court case to £70m. The importance of this is that, when valuing the club, this is a figure that the club must be including in their overall valuation.
Sales of similar clubs to ours have attained values in the region of £130m
So if our market value is £130m and the club expect to attain in the region of £70m from court cases that could explain the £200m price tag.
It could also suggest, if we were to lose the court case, then our valuation could potentially just be £130m
Sun Mar 24, 2024 6:17 pm
Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:19 pm
Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:29 pm
Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:It has been suggested recently that VT values his shares in the club at a value of £200m
It has also been suggested that he has received three offers to buy the club at values between £100-150m and this got me thinking, with all the talk of court cases, maybe there is a reason behind his valuation.
In recent days we have learned that the club have lowered their valuation of the court case to £70m. The importance of this is that, when valuing the club, this is a figure that the club must be including in their overall valuation.
Sales of similar clubs to ours have attained values in the region of £130m
So if our market value is £130m and the club expect to attain in the region of £70m from court cases that could explain the £200m price tag.
It could also suggest, if we were to lose the court case, then our valuation could potentially just be £130m
That would make a sort of sense...![]()
What we do know is that VT has had serious offers, as well as tentative enquiries, with each being turned down...
Sadly, the serious offer that would work best for us was not only rejected but sent back with a message 'all bids considered, except yours!'
Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:15 pm
kyle08 wrote:He's waiting on these court cases then he's selling, he's only loosing money at the club so I can't see him wanting to stay anyway
Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:20 pm
Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:It has been suggested recently that VT values his shares in the club at a value of £200m
It has also been suggested that he has received three offers to buy the club at values between £100-150m and this got me thinking, with all the talk of court cases, maybe there is a reason behind his valuation.
In recent days we have learned that the club have lowered their valuation of the court case to £70m. The importance of this is that, when valuing the club, this is a figure that the club must be including in their overall valuation.
Sales of similar clubs to ours have attained values in the region of £130m
So if our market value is £130m and the club expect to attain in the region of £70m from court cases that could explain the £200m price tag.
It could also suggest, if we were to lose the court case, then our valuation could potentially just be £130m
That would make a sort of sense...![]()
What we do know is that VT has had serious offers, as well as tentative enquiries, with each being turned down...
Sadly, the serious offer that would work best for us was not only rejected but sent back with a message 'all bids considered, except yours!'
Mon Mar 25, 2024 4:14 am
worcester_ccfc wrote:Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:It has been suggested recently that VT values his shares in the club at a value of £200m
It has also been suggested that he has received three offers to buy the club at values between £100-150m and this got me thinking, with all the talk of court cases, maybe there is a reason behind his valuation.
In recent days we have learned that the club have lowered their valuation of the court case to £70m. The importance of this is that, when valuing the club, this is a figure that the club must be including in their overall valuation.
Sales of similar clubs to ours have attained values in the region of £130m
So if our market value is £130m and the club expect to attain in the region of £70m from court cases that could explain the £200m price tag.
It could also suggest, if we were to lose the court case, then our valuation could potentially just be £130m
That would make a sort of sense...![]()
What we do know is that VT has had serious offers, as well as tentative enquiries, with each being turned down...
Sadly, the serious offer that would work best for us was not only rejected but sent back with a message 'all bids considered, except yours!'
We all know who that person is Chris, it’s been alluded to on this thread.
As you rightly say, it would work for the club.
But unfortunately Tan will never let his personal vendetta go.
I do think that when a takeover does happen, Dalman will be involved on the buying side in one way or the other.
Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:26 am
Sven wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:It has been suggested recently that VT values his shares in the club at a value of £200m
It has also been suggested that he has received three offers to buy the club at values between £100-150m and this got me thinking, with all the talk of court cases, maybe there is a reason behind his valuation.
In recent days we have learned that the club have lowered their valuation of the court case to £70m. The importance of this is that, when valuing the club, this is a figure that the club must be including in their overall valuation.
Sales of similar clubs to ours have attained values in the region of £130m
So if our market value is £130m and the club expect to attain in the region of £70m from court cases that could explain the £200m price tag.
It could also suggest, if we were to lose the court case, then our valuation could potentially just be £130m
That would make a sort of sense...![]()
What we do know is that VT has had serious offers, as well as tentative enquiries, with each being turned down...
Sadly, the serious offer that would work best for us was not only rejected but sent back with a message 'all bids considered, except yours!'
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:04 am
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:39 am
Barclay1 wrote:The person being excluded from bidding is being done so because he is seen as far more popular than Tan himself, ( which I believe he is) and that is something Tan cannot ever accept.
In my opinion, we see a man with a passion for our club v a man with no feeling whatsoever for the club.
Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:31 am
Barclay1 wrote:The person being excluded from bidding is being done so because he is seen as far more popular than Tan himself, ( which I believe he is) and that is something Tan cannot ever accept.
In my opinion, we see a man with a passion for our club v a man with no feeling whatsoever for the club.
Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:53 am
bluelover wrote:Barclay1 wrote:The person being excluded from bidding is being done so because he is seen as far more popular than Tan himself, ( which I believe he is) and that is something Tan cannot ever accept.
In my opinion, we see a man with a passion for our club v a man with no feeling whatsoever for the club.
It would be great to have a man with a passion for our club as long as that man ran the club the right way. Unfortunately the man being alluded to here was forced to sell said club for a reason and do we really want to be in that position again?
Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:30 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:48 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:50 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:12 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 2:37 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 4:05 pm
piledriver64 wrote:Apart from this board Sam is NOT universally popular.
In fact many, including me, wouldn’t want him anywhere near my club. We might not have got relegated with Sam but we nearly lost everything.
Black Friday will never be forgotten by those of us who were supporters back then.
I have a feeling that Dalman will be behind a bid after all of these court cases. I’m not sure I’m too keen on that but if we rule out the Hammam bids there aren’t many others to be too choosey over !!
Mon Mar 25, 2024 5:28 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:18 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:29 pm
goats wrote:200 million that’s hilarious he will never get that whilst we are in the championship what did Birmingham get sold for recently or West Brom? I’m sure that’s what he actually put in due to being unable to run a football club properly, he’s not really learned from a long list of mistakes has he? His culture of “saving face” will no doubt cost him a few more million in the next few years.
Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:30 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:49 pm
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:13 pm
Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Apart from this board Sam is NOT universally popular.
In fact many, including me, wouldn’t want him anywhere near my club. We might not have got relegated with Sam but we nearly lost everything.
Black Friday will never be forgotten by those of us who were supporters back then.
I have a feeling that Dalman will be behind a bid after all of these court cases. I’m not sure I’m too keen on that but if we rule out the Hammam bids there aren’t many others to be too choosey over !!
I think you would be totally shocked, Sam turned up at Reading away and walked over a mile and fans were shaking his hands,
Quiung for photos with him and singing his name.
Before Sam came along we were dying in League 4, crowds 4,000 at home and in debt going NO where.
Most of the fans that started going nowadays started through Sam starting an unbelievable journey the facts are there by how crowds surged up beyond.
As I said Sam knows the mistakes he has done.
Tan and Co give a shit and are running us in to the ground a fact.
So please don’t make out fans only on here are the only ones that want Sam back, you don’t lol Sam is still loved by thousands and I do know thousands.
I can tell you this This Regime is hated beyond.
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:30 pm
Cardiff_CPT wrote:Can someone explain why Tan selling to Sam would be "losing face" for Tan?
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:44 pm
piledriver64 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:Apart from this board Sam is NOT universally popular.
In fact many, including me, wouldn’t want him anywhere near my club. We might not have got relegated with Sam but we nearly lost everything.
Black Friday will never be forgotten by those of us who were supporters back then.
I have a feeling that Dalman will be behind a bid after all of these court cases. I’m not sure I’m too keen on that but if we rule out the Hammam bids there aren’t many others to be too choosey over !!
I think you would be totally shocked, Sam turned up at Reading away and walked over a mile and fans were shaking his hands,
Quiung for photos with him and singing his name.
Before Sam came along we were dying in League 4, crowds 4,000 at home and in debt going NO where.
Most of the fans that started going nowadays started through Sam starting an unbelievable journey the facts are there by how crowds surged up beyond.
As I said Sam knows the mistakes he has done.
Tan and Co give a shit and are running us in to the ground a fact.
So please don’t make out fans only on here are the only ones that want Sam back, you don’t lol Sam is still loved by thousands and I do know thousands.
I can tell you this This Regime is hated beyond.
We all move in different spaces and whilst I completely accept that there are people who would welcome Sam back, there are similar (if not bigger) numbers who simply wouldn’t.
I wouldn’t claim the current regime is popular, even I would rather a change ! But I am realistic in knowing we have to be careful what we wish for and hope that whoever does end up taking over has both the money and genuine willingness to push our club forward.
I honestly believe that once this final/ultimate court case is finalised, Tan will do one of two things. He’ll either give it one more serious crack at promotion to improve his selling value or he’ll call it quits and sell knowing that he will have recovered a fair bit of his outlay.
I really believe that Tan will recover significant sums of money at the end of this case, a lot more than many anticipated.
An interesting few months either way.
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:45 pm
Cardiff_CPT wrote:Can someone explain why Tan selling to Sam would be "losing face" for Tan?
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:47 pm
kyle08 wrote:Cardiff_CPT wrote:Can someone explain why Tan selling to Sam would be "losing face" for Tan?
well hes said in lots of news articles that he would never sell to sam, hes a ego maniac selling to sam would make him feel like hes been defeated.
i for one would welcome sam back with open arms, his dreams for cardiff where huge did he make mistakes ? of course he did who dont, but he done everything for his love for the club and welsh people at that!
im sure sam being the smart businessman he is now has alot more money, so he would i have no doubt take us to the next level he would also unite the fans again and get the atmosphere bouncing like it should be !
since tan has taken over, we have been in the prem twice yes but we all knew we would go straight down, we never did or still dont have a plan going forward. the red and badge change killed it for alot of fans its just not been the same since !
Mon Mar 25, 2024 9:52 pm
Welshman in CA wrote:The problem for CCFC is that saving face is way more important to him than a few hundred million which may be another reason he wouldn't sell to Sam.