Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:56 pm
12thMan wrote:Dicey wrote:
I took the wife yesterday and it was her first visit to our stadium . She previously had visited Ninian park many years ago and she couldn't believe how we had moved on and was impressed by the stadium and the facilities .
Sun Jan 13, 2013 1:59 pm
Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:24 pm
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:25 pm
JONNY012697 wrote:JonCCFC wrote:Just because we don't have much history it doesn't mean we needed to change the whole look of the club... history is made through success. I don't care if there hasn't been as many highs as the lows, our club is Cardiff City the Bluebirds, and they're slowly taking that away from us for selfish reasons. The only thing they have done is put shame on the club and they've made us look like "sell outs".
I'll never forgive them, even if we get promoted. Football is not all about success and I wish some people would see that.
thats all very interesting so how did you feel when Sam tried the same thing?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:39 pm
JonCCFC wrote:Just because we don't have much history it doesn't mean we needed to change the whole look of the club... history is made through success. I don't care if there hasn't been as many highs as the lows, our club is Cardiff City the Bluebirds, and they're slowly taking that away from us for selfish reasons. The only thing they have done is put shame on the club and they've made us look like "sell outs".
I'll never forgive them, even if we get promoted. Football is not all about success and I wish some people would see that.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:42 pm
PtB wrote:ManInBlack wrote:There's three whole divisions of clubs and even some Premier clubs who would jump at the chance of the investment and potential success we have with the Malaysians. Most have history and badges that they are proud of but would accept a rebranding that give some financial stability and potential success.
I've spoken to alot of people from other clubs all over the country and very very few have been willing to give anything up just for a bit of financial backing and possible success.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:45 pm
PtB wrote:ManInBlack wrote:There's three whole divisions of clubs and even some Premier clubs who would jump at the chance of the investment and potential success we have with the Malaysians. Most have history and badges that they are proud of but would accept a rebranding that give some financial stability and potential success.
I've spoken to alot of people from other clubs all over the country and very very few have been willing to give anything up just for a bit of financial backing and possible success.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:50 pm
ManInBlack wrote:There's three whole divisions of clubs and even some Premier clubs who would jump at the chance of the investment and potential success we have with the Malaysians. Most have history and badges that they are proud of but would accept a rebranding that give some financial stability and potential success.
I've followed the club since 1966 and in all that time we've been the 'Sleeping Giant of Wales'....perhaps now we have finally got our wake up call.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:16 pm
the blue path wrote:Whether its good history or bad history it was our history and I was proud of it, it should have been cherished and built on not thrown away, f#ck is vision and plans for the Far East a football club is primarily for the community it is in , South Wales not south east Asia.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 5:19 pm
Hofmeister wrote:PtB wrote:ManInBlack wrote:There's three whole divisions of clubs and even some Premier clubs who would jump at the chance of the investment and potential success we have with the Malaysians. Most have history and badges that they are proud of but would accept a rebranding that give some financial stability and potential success.
I've spoken to alot of people from other clubs all over the country and very very few have been willing to give anything up just for a bit of financial backing and possible success.
same here... the unisono reply was "you dont do that to a football club...no matter how successful you are afterwards"
Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:23 pm
RobP wrote:Seems to make sense and if we were not a football club it exactly how a struggling business would be acquired and turned around. The problem is we are a football club with a loyal following who can't just sit back and watch our club be taken away from us.
The rebrand is focused on attracting Malaysian interest and is so disrespectful to us. What if we walked into Malaysia took over their capital team, changed the badge, changed the colour and then stuck Wales on their shirts. Id expect any 'customers' of this local business to walk away in protest.
Unfortunately what we see now may be just the tip of the iceberg because if Tan can really get what he wants it will be something like -
A football club called Malaysia FC playing in the Premier league
A football club made up entirely of Malaysian players
A club playing in red with a Malaysian style dragon on their shirts.
A club playing much nearer London for maximum kudos and business potential
The real worrying thing is that that the business plan seems to be so focused on Malaysia that it doesn't really matter what we do because down here as his plan isn't based on our support. He will do what he wants when he wants in the interest of Malaysia.
I hope I'm wrong and Cardiff's identity is retained but the worst case is that a team that used to be Cardiff plays in the premier but us fans end up with nothing
Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:44 pm
taffyapple wrote:ManInBlack wrote:There's three whole divisions of clubs and even some Premier clubs who would jump at the chance of the investment and potential success we have with the Malaysians. Most have history and badges that they are proud of but would accept a rebranding that give some financial stability and potential success.
I've followed the club since 1966 and in all that time we've been the 'Sleeping Giant of Wales'....perhaps now we have finally got our wake up call.
The true fact about the Malaysian take over is they did things a couple of seasons ago to
piss a few off. Long before the rebrand. Long before any hint of a rebrand existed.
These people have done nothing but undermine Vincent Tan at every opportunity since.
"Gone in the summer" "Not backing the manager"... all this shite has been spouted for
over two years. All the success we are having this season is being TOTALLY credited to
Malky Mackay, yet I've not seen Malky dipping into his pockets to buy ONE player, or to
pay off ONE creditor.
Forget the rebrand for now.
Will somebody tell me what Vincent Tan was doing wrong LAST season????? Because as
far as the EVIDENCE shows... he was paying off creditors, restructuring, getting new staff
and players in and building the foundations for a concerted push for promotion this year!
I have come to the conclusion that as Tan does not owe Langstone a penny, he should not
give them a thing. That way, he can concentrate his finances on players and the Club and
also it will stop that 'debt' from shooting up significantly and him getting slagged off yet
again!. Let the courts decide. Promotion for Cardiff City is far more important than Langstone
Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:03 pm
Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:04 pm
taffyapple wrote:ManInBlack wrote:There's three whole divisions of clubs and even some Premier clubs who would jump at the chance of the investment and potential success we have with the Malaysians. Most have history and badges that they are proud of but would accept a rebranding that give some financial stability and potential success.
I've followed the club since 1966 and in all that time we've been the 'Sleeping Giant of Wales'....perhaps now we have finally got our wake up call.
The true fact about the Malaysian take over is they did things a couple of seasons ago to
piss a few off. Long before the rebrand. Long before any hint of a rebrand existed.
These people have done nothing but undermine Vincent Tan at every opportunity since.
"Gone in the summer" "Not backing the manager"... all this shite has been spouted for
over two years. All the success we are having this season is being TOTALLY credited to
Malky Mackay, yet I've not seen Malky dipping into his pockets to buy ONE player, or to
pay off ONE creditor.
Forget the rebrand for now.
Will somebody tell me what Vincent Tan was doing wrong LAST season????? Because as
far as the EVIDENCE shows... he was paying off creditors, restructuring, getting new staff
and players in and building the foundations for a concerted push for promotion this year!
I have come to the conclusion that as Tan does not owe Langstone a penny, he should not
give them a thing. That way, he can concentrate his finances on players and the Club and
also it will stop that 'debt' from shooting up significantly and him getting slagged off yet
again!. Let the courts decide. Promotion for Cardiff City is far more important than Langstone
Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:30 pm
davewebber65 wrote:to be honest i am forced to agree with vincent tan. all my 50 years of supporting city have delivered is heartache and tears. we have been led by a succession of failed and crooked businessmen and fed promises of the second coming. we have sucked them up and demanded more.
what i find unbelieveable is that after all our failure there are some who want more of the same ineptitude. i don't. before i depart this planet for pastures new i want to see this club in the premier league. if that means i have to wear a red shirt then sobeit
Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:55 pm
bluebird58 wrote:The supporters of virtually every team in the Football League would love to be in our position with our financial backing, and would quite happily change their club colours to achieve it.
People are deluding themselves if they think otherwise.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 8:55 pm
Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:12 pm
Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:13 pm
ManInBlack wrote:There's three whole divisions of clubs and even some Premier clubs who would jump at the chance of the investment and potential success we have with the Malaysians. Most have history and badges that they are proud of but would accept a rebranding that give some financial stability and potential success.
I've followed the club since 1966 and in all that time we've been the 'Sleeping Giant of Wales'....perhaps now we have finally got our wake up call.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:13 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Who are they to dismiss our history FFS Its our history as someone else said good or bad. The Malaysians will go as far as the rules can be bent.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:22 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Who are they to dismiss our history FFS Its our history as someone else said good or bad. The Malaysians will go as far as the rules can be bent.
Explain to us how anyone other than Doctor Who, can change history?????????
Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:27 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Who are they to dismiss our history FFS Its our history as someone else said good or bad. The Malaysians will go as far as the rules can be bent.
Explain to us how anyone other than Doctor Who, can change history?????????
Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:29 pm
Sun Jan 13, 2013 9:48 pm
BigGwynram wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Who are they to dismiss our history FFS Its our history as someone else said good or bad. The Malaysians will go as far as the rules can be bent.
Explain to us how anyone other than Doctor Who, can change history?????????
Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:24 pm
the blue path wrote:Gwyn I think nukes said they dismissed our history not changed it, it is possible to be dismissive
Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:28 pm
BigGwynram wrote:the blue path wrote:Gwyn I think nukes said they dismissed our history not changed it, it is possible to be dismissive
Same thing, how can you dismiss it, It's history, fact, recorded happened, stored, they can give us a future which no one else was looking to do when they stepped in, they can change, modify adjust badges colours etc, but out history and our nickname is in our hands as fans, and they can't make us forget or dismiss anything.
How did all the other badge changes slip through almost unnoticed and unchallenged.
Answer me this, would you buy a pub thousands of pounds in debt, a real shit hole, dying on it's feet and then simply carry on doing what had failed before, or would you look at the potential and see that change was necessary if it was to continue in business.
And for those saying it's more than a business etc. then just look around at the club's who took that approach.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:33 pm
BigGwynram wrote:the blue path wrote:Gwyn I think nukes said they dismissed our history not changed it, it is possible to be dismissive
Same thing, how can you dismiss it, It's history, fact, recorded happened, stored, they can give us a future which no one else was looking to do when they stepped in, they can change, modify adjust badges colours etc, but out history and our nickname is in our hands as fans, and they can't make us forget or dismiss anything.
How did all the other badge changes slip through almost unnoticed and unchallenged.
Answer me this, would you buy a pub thousands of pounds in debt, a real shit hole, dying on it's feet and then simply carry on doing what had failed before, or would you look at the potential and see that change was necessary if it was to continue in business.
And for those saying it's more than a business etc. then just look around at the club's who took that approach.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:33 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:BigGwynram wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Who are they to dismiss our history FFS Its our history as someone else said good or bad. The Malaysians will go as far as the rules can be bent.
Explain to us how anyone other than Doctor Who, can change history?????????
Hey haven't changed it, it's been dismissed, along with the traditions and identity of the club.
Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:44 pm
bspark wrote:BigGwynram wrote:the blue path wrote:Gwyn I think nukes said they dismissed our history not changed it, it is possible to be dismissive
Same thing, how can you dismiss it, It's history, fact, recorded happened, stored, they can give us a future which no one else was looking to do when they stepped in, they can change, modify adjust badges colours etc, but out history and our nickname is in our hands as fans, and they can't make us forget or dismiss anything.
How did all the other badge changes slip through almost unnoticed and unchallenged.
Answer me this, would you buy a pub thousands of pounds in debt, a real shit hole, dying on it's feet and then simply carry on doing what had failed before, or would you look at the potential and see that change was necessary if it was to continue in business.
And for those saying it's more than a business etc. then just look around at the club's who took that approach.
To carry on the pub analogy, at what point would you draw the line? Would you be happy if the owners changed the name of the pub and put up prices to push out the usual clientele and bring a higher class of corporate consumer? Or are you happy for them to do whatever they need to do to push the new brand forward?
Sun Jan 13, 2013 10:48 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Hofmeister wrote:PtB wrote:ManInBlack wrote:There's three whole divisions of clubs and even some Premier clubs who would jump at the chance of the investment and potential success we have with the Malaysians. Most have history and badges that they are proud of but would accept a rebranding that give some financial stability and potential success.
I've spoken to alot of people from other clubs all over the country and very very few have been willing to give anything up just for a bit of financial backing and possible success.
same here... the unisono reply was "you dont do that to a football club...no matter how successful you are afterwards"
if you asked fans you will always get same answer! try asking different question, like liquidation same colours or investment different colours? be more diverse answer