Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:52 pm
DandoCCFC wrote:I think he means a signing.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:52 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Conditions why risk him smith back so no problem
Smith?! What's that got to do with it?
You have been watching us recently haven't you?! Bellamy has been playing up top.. [/quote
Ffs can a man say anything without forum police picking holes in whats said? Meant got smith back so more cover! So not as bad belllers not playing, ok barry?
Cover for what?!
That's like saying don't worry about Craig, Kev's back so we've got more cover in the squad.
ffs thats what it is more cover at top end field. If that is not any goodt o you tuff luck! cant be arsed to play games
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:53 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:53 pm
mr'mogreenz wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:I think he means a signing.
Who does? Natman? This thread is getting confusing now Lol
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:54 pm
natman wrote:Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:54 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:55 pm
pembroke allan wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Conditions why risk him smith back so no problem
Smith?! What's that got to do with it?
You have been watching us recently haven't you?! Bellamy has been playing up top.. [/quote
Ffs can a man say anything without forum police picking holes in whats said? Meant got smith back so more cover! So not as bad belllers not playing, ok barry?
Cover for what?!
That's like saying don't worry about Craig, Kev's back so we've got more cover in the squad.
ffs thats what it is more cover at top end field. If that is not any goodt o you tuff luck! cant be arsed to play games
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:56 pm
natman wrote:Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange
Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:59 pm
pembroke allan wrote:You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:02 pm
mr'mogreenz wrote:natman wrote:Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange
So who's out then? Bellamy and who else? Who's the other player? Just say
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:02 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!
Not at all, just giving my opinions on the topics posted! Just don't feel that Smith isn't a direct replacement for Bellars.
You know I love you really Allan.
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:10 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!
Not at all, just giving my opinions on the topics posted! Just don't feel that Smith isn't a direct replacement for Bellars.
You know I love you really Allan.
Well someone has to? Didnt say direct replacement, but we are not short of cover are we?
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:19 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:19 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:23 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:30 pm
I Bleed Blue wrote:Maybe Malky hasn't gone himself?
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:33 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:33 pm
Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:36 pm
Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:01 am
natman wrote:Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange
Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:03 am
Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:08 am
Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:33 am
Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Barry Chuckle wrote:pembroke allan wrote:You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!
Not at all, just giving my opinions on the topics posted! Just don't feel that Smith isn't a direct replacement for Bellars.
You know I love you really Allan.
Well someone has to? Didnt say direct replacement, but we are not short of cover are we?
Up front, I'd say we were limited. Which is why I'm glad were actively chasing a striker.
Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:41 am
Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:29 am
Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:35 am
troobloo3339 wrote:Looks like we maystart with 4 5 1 formation again....thatwaywhitts is freed up to play further foreward iwould start with .....marshall..connelly..hudson..turner..taylor.. noone..smith ..whitts..gunnerson..conway..helguson..subs..lewis..mcnoughton..cowie..kimbo..mason...gestede...ralls...thatteam squad should be able to get us a result .
Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:40 am
Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:41 am
Deano1 wrote:troobloo3339 wrote:Looks like we maystart with 4 5 1 formation again....thatwaywhitts is freed up to play further foreward iwould start with .....marshall..connelly..hudson..turner..taylor.. noone..smith ..whitts..gunnerson..conway..helguson..subs..lewis..mcnoughton..cowie..kimbo..mason...gestede...ralls...thatteam squad should be able to get us a result .
Don't see us starting with Noone, Smith AND Conway. Far too lightweight in Midfield.
Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:43 am
Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:46 am
troobloo3339 wrote:Well you would agree with any one if its against me chuckle ....answer my reply then