Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:52 pm

DandoCCFC wrote:I think he means a signing. :lol:

Who does? Natman? This thread is getting confusing now Lol

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:52 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:Conditions why risk him smith back so no problem


Smith?! What's that got to do with it?

You have been watching us recently haven't you?! Bellamy has been playing up top.. :lol:[/quote

Ffs can a man say anything without forum police picking holes in whats said? Meant got smith back so more cover! So not as bad belllers not playing, ok barry?


Cover for what?! :lol:

That's like saying don't worry about Craig, Kev's back so we've got more cover in the squad. :lol:

ffs thats what it is more cover at top end field. If that is not any goodt o you tuff luck! cant be arsed to play games

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:53 pm

Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:53 pm

mr'mogreenz wrote:
DandoCCFC wrote:I think he means a signing. :lol:

Who does? Natman? This thread is getting confusing now Lol

Im with you on that?!?! :?

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:54 pm

natman wrote:Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange


:?

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:54 pm

I'm sure MM has his reasons and I'll go with that.

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:55 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:Conditions why risk him smith back so no problem


Smith?! What's that got to do with it?

You have been watching us recently haven't you?! Bellamy has been playing up top.. :lol:[/quote

Ffs can a man say anything without forum police picking holes in whats said? Meant got smith back so more cover! So not as bad belllers not playing, ok barry?


Cover for what?! :lol:

That's like saying don't worry about Craig, Kev's back so we've got more cover in the squad. :lol:

ffs thats what it is more cover at top end field. If that is not any goodt o you tuff luck! cant be arsed to play games


You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:56 pm

natman wrote:Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange

So who's out then? Bellamy and who else? Who's the other player? Just say

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:59 pm

pembroke allan wrote:You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!


Not at all, just giving my opinions on the topics posted! Just don't feel that Smith isn't a direct replacement for Bellars. :D

You know I love you really Allan. :lol:

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:02 pm

mr'mogreenz wrote:
natman wrote:Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange

So who's out then? Bellamy and who else? Who's the other player? Just say

I know you are all going to be gutted it's Rudy :lol:

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:02 pm

Barry Chuckle wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!


Not at all, just giving my opinions on the topics posted! Just don't feel that Smith isn't a direct replacement for Bellars. :D

You know I love you really Allan. :lol:


Well someone has to? Didnt say direct replacement, but we are not short of cover are we?

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:10 pm

pembroke allan wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!


Not at all, just giving my opinions on the topics posted! Just don't feel that Smith isn't a direct replacement for Bellars. :D

You know I love you really Allan. :lol:


Well someone has to? Didnt say direct replacement, but we are not short of cover are we?


Up front, I'd say we were limited. Which is why I'm glad were actively chasing a striker. :ayatollah:

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:19 pm

Malky clearly doesn't know what hes doing, sack him now and bring in Steve Kean and Mourinho as his assistant. :old:

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:19 pm

Maybe Malky hasn't gone himself?

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:23 pm

Maybe Tan has said we are not aloud to wear the blue away kit.

Maybe Rudy forgot his gloves so has nipped home for them.

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:30 pm

I Bleed Blue wrote:Maybe Malky hasn't gone himself?

I wonder!!!

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:33 pm

maybe its mason, maybe he's being sold. :o

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:33 pm

Maybe Malky was watching Leicester V Boro tonight so hasn't arrived at the hotel yet.

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:36 pm

Mason and Helga up front then :ayatollah:

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:01 am

natman wrote:Hudson is ok chill, I'm not awaiting to mention names but what I say is true, at the moment but things can change, I can't explain it but things do seem strange




christ, this club has more holes than a porcupines raincoat!



everyone knows everything :lol: :roll:

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:03 am

I wouldn't like to guess why Beller's has not travelled but he's certainly one of our inform players at the mo.
I'm hoping we have enough quality in our squad to get something our of tomorrow's game.

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:08 am

It could honestly be something to do with the Blackpool pitch. Their pitch is beyond belief, disgraceful for a Championship side. Mason and Heidar up front can cause problems though I'm sure! :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:33 am

Barry Chuckle wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:
Barry Chuckle wrote:
pembroke allan wrote:You got pmt barry? Very arguementative tonight!


Not at all, just giving my opinions on the topics posted! Just don't feel that Smith isn't a direct replacement for Bellars. :D

You know I love you really Allan. :lol:


Well someone has to? Didnt say direct replacement, but we are not short of cover are we?


Up front, I'd say we were limited. Which is why I'm glad were actively chasing a striker. :ayatollah:


will agree with you there! we are very limited with out and out striker it may well cost us if don't get one! whilst cant complain about results, the way teams line up against us makes it harder for midfield to go forward to help score goals, hence whitts less threatening of late, :lol:
back on lappy now!

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:41 am

Whitts was injured at the beginning of the month so it could be him missing if the problem hasn't cleared up properly.

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:29 am

Looks like we maystart with 4 5 1 formation again....thatwaywhitts is freed up to play further foreward iwould start with .....marshall..connelly..hudson..turner..taylor.. noone..smith ..whitts..gunnerson..conway..helguson..subs..lewis..mcnoughton..cowie..kimbo..mason...gestede...ralls...thatteam squad should be able to get us a result . :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:35 am

troobloo3339 wrote:Looks like we maystart with 4 5 1 formation again....thatwaywhitts is freed up to play further foreward iwould start with .....marshall..connelly..hudson..turner..taylor.. noone..smith ..whitts..gunnerson..conway..helguson..subs..lewis..mcnoughton..cowie..kimbo..mason...gestede...ralls...thatteam squad should be able to get us a result . :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Don't see us starting with Noone, Smith AND Conway. Far too lightweight in Midfield.

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:40 am

How do you work that out we been starting with noone whitts gunnerson andconway in a 442 so my 451 with smith in along side whitts andgunnreson is too light wieght how??????????.

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:41 am

Deano1 wrote:
troobloo3339 wrote:Looks like we maystart with 4 5 1 formation again....thatwaywhitts is freed up to play further foreward iwould start with .....marshall..connelly..hudson..turner..taylor.. noone..smith ..whitts..gunnerson..conway..helguson..subs..lewis..mcnoughton..cowie..kimbo..mason...gestede...ralls...thatteam squad should be able to get us a result . :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Don't see us starting with Noone, Smith AND Conway. Far too lightweight in Midfield.


Agreed.

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:43 am

Well you would agree with any one if its against me chuckle ....answer my reply then

Re: Bellamy hasn't travelled!

Sat Jan 19, 2013 11:46 am

troobloo3339 wrote:Well you would agree with any one if its against me chuckle ....answer my reply then


No, I just agree with the post I quoted. Don't flatter yourself. :lol:

For me, if you have a midfield like that, we COULD be prone to counter attacks after we have attacked ourselves.