Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:28 pm
2blue2handle wrote:I couldn't care less.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:28 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:29 pm
kenbarlow wrote:weeeeeeee
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:29 pm
Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:30 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:31 pm
CjBluebird17 wrote:kenbarlow wrote:weeeeeeee
Didnt take you long to get back home straight on the pc to get on here did it Pathetic
Enjoy your day out though in the "mickey mouse" cup as you like to call it
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:31 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:33 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:38 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
What bullshit? That cech had to be forced into more good saves than Tremmel? Can you remind me if 1 save Tremmel had to make?
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:39 pm
Taff on the Mersey wrote:WELL DONE TO THE SQUAD.
THEIR SUPPORTERS DESERVE NO CREDIT, THEY TURN UP TO CHELSEA IN THEIR SHIT NUMBERS AND THEN THIS BALL BOY JUST SUMS THEM UP PERFECTLY TONIGHT, OH AND THE SEASON TICKET HOLDER SAYING HE WANTED CHELSEA TO WIN ON SSN!!!
f**k MY LIFE.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:40 pm
Jacktastic wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Beat Liverpool away, beat the Champions of europe comfortably over 2 legs.... Hurts doesn't it???
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:40 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
What bullshit? That cech had to be forced into more good saves than Tremmel? Can you remind me if 1 save Tremmel had to make?
Chelsea were incredibly wasteful over 2 legs, especially at home where the jacks were battered but got gifted 2 goals. The keeper may not have done much tonight but that's because you defended so deep and in numbers, which was the point of the post. Can't blame you for defending your lead, but lets not pretend you didnt play for the draw tonight.
Guess you'll be banned again soon though
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:40 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:44 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:Some odd comments.
Don't even bother having a go at me for voicing my opinion, isn't that what a message board is about?
I hope Bradford win, but Swansea have done well to get to the final - like us last year.
I, personally, don't care that much about them. I don't give a f**k what they do, as we're the biggest club in Wales!
Don't see why people get so worked up about them. Not even our biggest rival traditionally.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:47 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
What bullshit? That cech had to be forced into more good saves than Tremmel? Can you remind me if 1 save Tremmel had to make?
Chelsea were incredibly wasteful over 2 legs, especially at home where the jacks were battered but got gifted 2 goals. The keeper may not have done much tonight but that's because you defended so deep and in numbers, which was the point of the post. Can't blame you for defending your lead, but lets not pretend you didnt play for the draw tonight.
Guess you'll be banned again soon though
Defending in numbers is not a negative when in the same breath you also have the more and better chances, that's just a good team and sort of the premise of football.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:47 pm
TheTrueBlue7 wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:Some odd comments.
Don't even bother having a go at me for voicing my opinion, isn't that what a message board is about?
I hope Bradford win, but Swansea have done well to get to the final - like us last year.
I, personally, don't care that much about them. I don't give a f**k what they do, as we're the biggest club in Wales!
Don't see why people get so worked up about them. Not even our biggest rival traditionally.
why praise them then? if you dont care about them
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:50 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:54 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:
Err, it is when you do it for 180 mins. Didn't even win a corner in the 1st leg. Spin it all you want you rode your luck and got gifted the tie
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:56 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:57 pm
Blazing Saddles wrote:19,000
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:57 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:Blazing Saddles wrote:19,000
I know, and chelsea usually bring so many. Must be the snow and the fact they were 2-0 down. Still at least the jacks sold their end.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:58 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 10:59 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:As above
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:00 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:00 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:
Err, it is when you do it for 180 mins. Didn't even win a corner in the 1st leg. Spin it all you want you rode your luck and got gifted the tie
No spin needed. Away from home swansea were looking for the draw, defended well and took both their chances clinically. Just as Chelsea did to Barca last year.
The home leg was to play it tight to defend the lead while also looking for the goal. Chelsea didnt have 1 good chance and Swansea had about 4.
Spot on and very well done to them, anything else is transparent bitterness. Sometimes you have to just doff your cap.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:03 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:07 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:So they deserved to beat Swansea because their player didnt even hit the target?
Now how about Dyer, Michu, Ki and Hernandez forcing good saves from cech?
Really, give it up. You have backed a loser here, throw away the ticket
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:09 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:So they deserved to beat Swansea because their player didnt even hit the target?
Now how about Dyer, Michu, Ki and Hernandez forcing good saves from cech?
Really, give it up. You have backed a loser here, throw away the ticket
It was a chance though. No worse than hitting a shot at the keeper. Whats the shot count over the two legs then gumbo?
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:12 pm
Jacktastic wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Beat Liverpool away, beat the Champions of europe comfortably over 2 legs.... Hurts doesn't it???
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:19 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:So they deserved to beat Swansea because their player didnt even hit the target?
Now how about Dyer, Michu, Ki and Hernandez forcing good saves from cech?
Really, give it up. You have backed a loser here, throw away the ticket
It was a chance though. No worse than hitting a shot at the keeper. Whats the shot count over the two legs then gumbo?
How is that the same? If he hit the target then he's showing the ability to take the chance presented, if he doesn't then he doesn't deserve to score. Swansea had the better chances tonight by far, could have been 3-0 up at half time. Tremmel wasn't forced into one save really.
Shot count or good chance count? Good chance count is about 7-4 to Swans. Not sure why you want to count Lampards 35 yard tricklers for though.