Sun May 11, 2014 1:04 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Balesboot wrote:If blue is so important to you, why don't you just buy an Everton shirt?
If your family is so important to you then why not just get another one?
Sun May 11, 2014 1:11 pm
Balesboot wrote:
Equating family and shirt colour. What utter childishness. Do you live in Narnia?
Sun May 11, 2014 1:16 pm
Green Arrow wrote:Wayne S wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:No kit for my kids next season
What if they want it?
What if your kids want alcohol? Dont mean they got to have it.
Sun May 11, 2014 1:17 pm
Wayne S wrote:Green Arrow wrote:Wayne S wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:No kit for my kids next season
What if they want it?
What if your kids want alcohol? Dont mean they got to have it.
It was a slight on his statement. I was interested.
Apart from that, your example is very funny. Alcohol for under 18's is illegal. How on earth is that in anyway similar to buying clothes.
Sun May 11, 2014 1:20 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:..... A football club is a big part of many peoples lives, not just a £50 shirt. To suggest otherwise is just sheer stupidity.
Sun May 11, 2014 1:22 pm
Green Arrow wrote:Buying that red shirt should be illegal too.
Sun May 11, 2014 1:22 pm
Wayne S wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:No kit for my kids next season
What if they want it?
Sun May 11, 2014 1:22 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 1:24 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:Wayne S wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:No kit for my kids next season
What if they want it?
They don't
Sun May 11, 2014 1:25 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:Wayne S wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:No kit for my kids next season
What if they want it?
They don't
Sun May 11, 2014 1:29 pm
Wayne S wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:Wayne S wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:No kit for my kids next season
What if they want it?
They don't
You brought them up well. Even if it's via the use of brainwashing.
Sun May 11, 2014 1:37 pm
Balesboot wrote:If blue is so important to you, why don't you just buy an Everton shirt?
Sun May 11, 2014 1:37 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Balesboot wrote:
Equating family and shirt colour. What utter childishness. Do you live in Narnia?
Im not equating anything. I simply asked you a question.
A football club is a big part of many peoples lives, not just a £50 shirt. To suggest otherwise is just sheer stupidity.
Sun May 11, 2014 1:40 pm
Wayne S wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:..... A football club is a big part of many peoples lives, not just a £50 shirt. To suggest otherwise is just sheer stupidity.
Agree totally. But some people do take the whole thing too seriously. It should never be as big a part of peoples lives.
There must be families out there that do not see family members while they are in work midweek and then don't see them on the weekend until they rise around midday on Sunday after just returning in the early hours from the other side of the country.
Get some perspective, it saves on the stress as well.
Sun May 11, 2014 1:46 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 1:47 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 1:48 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 1:54 pm
If you bought a nice £10,000 car and I decided to paint it another colour and you got mad... It would be pretty silly of me to say "you are taking it way too serious".
Sun May 11, 2014 1:56 pm
Balesboot wrote:If you bought a nice £10,000 car and I decided to paint it another colour and you got mad... It would be pretty silly of me to say "you are taking it way too serious".
Then that would be a criminal act and you would be rightly prosecuted for it.
Re branding the colour of a clubs football shirt has not yet been made a criminal offence no matter how many disagree.
Tan is keeping CCFC afloat (so far) and is entitled to change/re brand.
Having said that I would trust the man and his entourage as much as I ever trusted Hammam, (which is zilch).
Sun May 11, 2014 2:06 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Balesboot wrote:If you bought a nice £10,000 car and I decided to paint it another colour and you got mad... It would be pretty silly of me to say "you are taking it way too serious".
Then that would be a criminal act and you would be rightly prosecuted for it.
Re branding the colour of a clubs football shirt has not yet been made a criminal offence no matter how many disagree.
Tan is keeping CCFC afloat (so far) and is entitled to change/re brand.
Having said that I would trust the man and his entourage as much as I ever trusted Hammam, (which is zilch).
So your emotional compass is whether it is legal or not?
Sun May 11, 2014 2:07 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 2:19 pm
Roath_Magic_ wrote:Then if legality isnt the issue then i once again refer you to the car question/scenario.
Sun May 11, 2014 2:40 pm
Balesboot wrote:Roath_Magic_ wrote:Then if legality isnt the issue then i once again refer you to the car question/scenario.
That was not a question, it was a statement. And a pretty irrelevant one at that.
Sun May 11, 2014 3:00 pm
Green Arrow wrote:Wayne S wrote:Gareth (Wilts) wrote:No kit for my kids next season
What if they want it?
What if your kids want alcohol? Dont mean they got to have it.
Sun May 11, 2014 3:22 pm
Green Arrow wrote:Balesboot wrote:Lets hope he pisses off ASAP.
Would you rather be in the hands of that kind, generous, and honest Mr Hammam?
Yes
Sun May 11, 2014 3:45 pm
Sun May 11, 2014 3:46 pm
Jinks wrote:Green Arrow wrote:Balesboot wrote:Lets hope he pisses off ASAP.
Would you rather be in the hands of that kind, generous, and honest Mr Hammam?
Yes
Where were the moaners when sam hammam changed our identity? hmmm
Sun May 11, 2014 4:01 pm
carlccfc wrote:Next seasons home kit is red and the new sponsor is one of Vincent Tans sports company.
Sun May 11, 2014 4:14 pm
AfricanBluebird wrote:carlccfc wrote:Next seasons home kit is red and the new sponsor is one of Vincent Tans sports company.
So send your season ticket back and boycott all games.
Sun May 11, 2014 4:34 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:AfricanBluebird wrote:carlccfc wrote:Next seasons home kit is red and the new sponsor is one of Vincent Tans sports company.
So send your season ticket back and boycott all games.
Not that easy though is it not.