Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:39 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:43 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:50 am
pembroke allan wrote:Surely tan will sell if these rumours are true? Basically if doesn't sell by end of this season he will have less parachute payments next season, as doubt we get promoted now! Once the payments run out we are not going to be worth what he paid into us, so what does he do then? Can't sell stadium players worth peanuts so be left with championship club with no money (maybe)?? That's all
Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:52 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:55 am
Daya wrote:Question for you Nukes ?
Do you expect this all to be denied or to come out in the open ? Are you're contacts linked to this deal and if so is this part of their plan to have in the open ?
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:02 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Daya wrote:Question for you Nukes ?
Do you expect this all to be denied or to come out in the open ? Are you're contacts linked to this deal and if so is this part of their plan to have in the open ?
Sam tried to push it into the background yesterday. But who knows. Let's see what Sam says next
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:06 am
Daya wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Daya wrote:Question for you Nukes ?
Do you expect this all to be denied or to come out in the open ? Are you're contacts linked to this deal and if so is this part of their plan to have in the open ?
Sam tried to push it into the background yesterday. But who knows. Let's see what Sam says next
As Annis would say hmmmmmmm Annis was adamant in fairness of this being put together.
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:06 am
Daya wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Surely tan will sell if these rumours are true? Basically if doesn't sell by end of this season he will have less parachute payments next season, as doubt we get promoted now! Once the payments run out we are not going to be worth what he paid into us, so what does he do then? Can't sell stadium players worth peanuts so be left with championship club with no money (maybe)?? That's all
Well he did say he would sell if the deal was right and clearly he's had enough of you ! Not that I can say I blame him !
You're fans leaders conned and lied to him that rebrand was acceptable.
Fancy being our feeder club lol
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:15 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:15 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:21 am
but if they built a new stadium what woyldthat cost ?ThomasC wrote:SwampCCFC wrote:wez1927 wrote:thomasblue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:The club alone is not worth £100m.
Just how much are the parachute payments?
I think it is ,the stadium is worth most of that
In any deal The stadium is only worth the money in revenue from ticket sales not bricks and mortar . Which at the moment are dropping by the week !
The stadium is as I understand not allowed to be sold, and is intrusted to Cardiff city holdings ltd . Tan can't sell the stadium and nobody can buy it .
The stadium is worth a lot even if it can't be sold ,Fulham were sold for 200 million last year do you think we are only worth half of them ?
with that as a yardstick i'd say we're worth less than half of fulham.
fulham are located in a prime area of london, with some of the highest property prices in the world. they were, at the time, an established premier league club.
we, on the other hand, lie in mid table in the championship. the true market value of our club is probably £80-100m. we'd be bought based upon our potential. though with the parachute payments factored in, maybe the true figure would be closer to the £100m mark than £80m.
if they own Craven Cottage, that would be some of the highest £££ 1 m2 in the country West London on the bank of the Themes
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:36 am
Nuclearblue wrote:Ok here are the names of the potential backers Sam has spoke with. Not well known but extremely wealthy.
Cameron Mackintosh
Jon Hunt
Sir Brian Souter
Alan Gloag
Francois Perrodo.
Hmmmmmm
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:38 am
Forever Blue wrote:I have to admit I dont know about the 2 Consortiums,I have heard nothing about the Sullivan's being involved,but that does not mean its not true.
I only know of one Consortium being put together with very Wealthy people involved,but once again that does not mean Nukes is wrong.
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:42 am
sounds like wishful thinking on both partsDaya wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I have to admit I dont know about the 2 Consortiums,I have heard nothing about the Sullivan's being involved,but that does not mean its not true.
I only know of one Consortium being put together with very Wealthy people involved,but once again that does not mean Nukes is wrong.
Firstly Nukes has been bang on the money quite often.
What's confusing me though Annis is you and nukes say there is a consortium and Sam says there's not and they don't work in football?
Who's saying there are two consortiums ?
Are you're names different then ? I see Nukes has a list
What's yours ?
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:43 am
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:45 am
Daya wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I have to admit I dont know about the 2 Consortiums,I have heard nothing about the Sullivan's being involved,but that does not mean its not true.
I only know of one Consortium being put together with very Wealthy people involved,but once again that does not mean Nukes is wrong.
Firstly Nukes has been bang on the money quite often.
What's confusing me though Annis is you and nukes say there is a consortium and Sam says there's not and they don't work in football?
Who's saying there are two consortiums ?
Are you're names different then ? I see Nukes has a list
What's yours ?
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:46 am
Forever Blue wrote:Daya wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I have to admit I dont know about the 2 Consortiums,I have heard nothing about the Sullivan's being involved,but that does not mean its not true.
I only know of one Consortium being put together with very Wealthy people involved,but once again that does not mean Nukes is wrong.
Firstly Nukes has been bang on the money quite often.
What's confusing me though Annis is you and nukes say there is a consortium and Sam says there's not and they don't work in football?
Who's saying there are two consortiums ?
Are you're names different then ? I see Nukes has a list
What's yours ?
Nukes has been Spot on,on many occasions
Steve,I just said I dont know about the Sullivans.
As to Sam in the paper yesterday Hmmmmmmmmmmm
Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:52 am
wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Daya wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I have to admit I dont know about the 2 Consortiums,I have heard nothing about the Sullivan's being involved,but that does not mean its not true.
I only know of one Consortium being put together with very Wealthy people involved,but once again that does not mean Nukes is wrong.
Firstly Nukes has been bang on the money quite often.
What's confusing me though Annis is you and nukes say there is a consortium and Sam says there's not and they don't work in football?
Who's saying there are two consortiums ?
Are you're names different then ? I see Nukes has a list
What's yours ?
Nukes has been Spot on,on many occasions
Steve,I just said I dont know about the Sullivans.
As to Sam in the paper yesterday Hmmmmmmmmmmm
Wrong west ham owner David gold it is ??????
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:02 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Daya wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I have to admit I dont know about the 2 Consortiums,I have heard nothing about the Sullivan's being involved,but that does not mean its not true.
I only know of one Consortium being put together with very Wealthy people involved,but once again that does not mean Nukes is wrong.
Firstly Nukes has been bang on the money quite often.
What's confusing me though Annis is you and nukes say there is a consortium and Sam says there's not and they don't work in football?
Who's saying there are two consortiums ?
Are you're names different then ? I see Nukes has a list
What's yours ?
Nukes has been Spot on,on many occasions
Steve,I just said I dont know about the Sullivans.
As to Sam in the paper yesterday Hmmmmmmmmmmm
Wrong west ham owner David gold it is ??????
Wez, I am not on about anything to do West Ham
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:18 pm
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:20 pm
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:23 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:David Sullivan has recently stated he is selling some of his West Ham shares and that the money will go to reducing west hams debt. If his shareholding dips below a certain level (9.9% I think) he is able to join the board of another team.
Sat Jan 03, 2015 12:44 pm
Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:00 pm
Daya wrote:np20 wrote:Nukes, i completely believe what you have told us is what you have been told.
But,
If the consortium can not afford to buy us up front, they can not afford us.
If so many wealthy men are involved why is the bid made in instalments and have to cough up the interest?
Is this just a flip job? Buy us turn us blue, get the fans back onside, fans back in the stadium, make us more appealing and sell us on for a profit, knowing what infrastructure we have in the training complex, stadium and potential stadium capacity?
No major deals are done on up front cash payments - very rare.
Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:07 pm
Forever Blue wrote:wez1927 wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Daya wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I have to admit I dont know about the 2 Consortiums,I have heard nothing about the Sullivan's being involved,but that does not mean its not true.
I only know of one Consortium being put together with very Wealthy people involved,but once again that does not mean Nukes is wrong.
Firstly Nukes has been bang on the money quite often.
What's confusing me though Annis is you and nukes say there is a consortium and Sam says there's not and they don't work in football?
Who's saying there are two consortiums ?
Are you're names different then ? I see Nukes has a list
What's yours ?
Nukes has been Spot on,on many occasions
Steve,I just said I dont know about the Sullivans.
As to Sam in the paper yesterday Hmmmmmmmmmmm
Wrong west ham owner David gold it is ??????
Wez, I am not on about anything to do West Ham
Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:32 pm
dorsetblue wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Ok here are the names of the potential backers Sam has spoke with. Not well known but extremely wealthy.
Cameron Mackintosh
Jon Hunt
Sir Brian Souter
Alan Gloag
Francois Perrodo.
Hmmmmmm
Cameron Mackintosh, we can have a musical made out of our current crisis, could make millions, Les Miserables, could be massive.
Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:36 pm
Leytonstoneblue wrote:Rumours gathering pace of a new consortium or two interested in buying the club, then former owner States big things happening in 2015 and thus, positive news suddenly lands, as supporters in their droves are considering not renewing season tickets. This could be the news that changes a few supporters minds into renewing Hmmmm as they say It would be nice to know exactly where these rumours are being started and who is to gain from them?
Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:46 pm
Gareth (Wilts) wrote:Leytonstoneblue wrote:Rumours gathering pace of a new consortium or two interested in buying the club, then former owner States big things happening in 2015 and thus, positive news suddenly lands, as supporters in their droves are considering not renewing season tickets. This could be the news that changes a few supporters minds into renewing Hmmmm as they say It would be nice to know exactly where these rumours are being started and who is to gain from them?
Synical bugger!!! I suspect that the club would be happy for rumours to go out regarding a takeover as I'm sure a fair few would renew on account of strong rumours. I dearly hope that takeover happens but until a new board is in place I'll remain an exiled bluebird
Sat Jan 03, 2015 1:49 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:Ok here are the names of the potential backers Sam has spoke with. Not well known but extremely wealthy.
Cameron Mackintosh
Jon Hunt
Sir Brian Souter
Alan Gloag
Francois Perrodo.
Hmmmmmm
Sat Jan 03, 2015 2:15 pm
CayoBluebird wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:Ok here are the names of the potential backers Sam has spoke with. Not well known but extremely wealthy.
Cameron Mackintosh
Jon Hunt
Sir Brian Souter
Alan Gloag
Francois Perrodo.
Hmmmmmm
Jon Hunt is currently suing HR Owen car dealerships for £1m for f*cking up his Lamborghini!
Who owns HR Owen?