Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:05 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:nerd wrote:Now, TLG, you take the Echo words as gospel - yet someone here who knows Borley says he wasn't interviewed by them.
That's Steve Davies. Salt of the earth is Steve. Top man. But he gets things wrong. We all do.
Today's Echo contains direct quotes from Steve Borley:
"Steve Howard is not a target for us this summer."
That's good enough for me. Isn't it good enough for you?
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:06 pm
nerd wrote:The Lone Gunman wrote:nerd wrote:Now, TLG, you take the Echo words as gospel - yet someone here who knows Borley says he wasn't interviewed by them.
That's Steve Davies. Salt of the earth is Steve. Top man. But he gets things wrong. We all do.
Today's Echo contains direct quotes from Steve Borley:
"Steve Howard is not a target for us this summer."
That's good enough for me. Isn't it good enough for you?
It is, TLG, if Borley said that.
Howard, based upon that statement, isn't a target. Doesn't mean he wasn't earlier in the summer. Consider the tense of the statement you are citing.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:07 pm
nerd wrote:It is, TLG, if Borley said that.
Howard, based upon that statement, isn't a target. Doesn't mean he wasn't earlier in the summer. Consider the tense of the statement you are citing.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:07 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:croesybluebird wrote:I think anyone who takes what is written in the Echo as gospel truth is something of a fool.
I think anyone who takes what is written on internet message boards as gospel truth is definitely a fool.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:07 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:nerd wrote:Now, TLG, you take the Echo words as gospel - yet someone here who knows Borley says he wasn't interviewed by them.
That's Steve Davies. Salt of the earth is Steve. Top man. But he gets things wrong. We all do.
Today's Echo contains direct quotes from Steve Borley:
"Steve Howard is not a target for us this summer."
That's good enough for me. Isn't it good enough for you?
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:07 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:08 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Correct Nerd, apparently The Echo have told porkies and Borley is fuming, But TLG is determined to attack Carl
Hardly an attack, is it?!?
You know as well as I do that Carl posts all sorts of stuff on here which turns out to have no basis in fact. There have been numerous examples. Personally, I think it's irresponsible for people to post such rumours unless they are 100% confident they are correct. All they are doing is putting their fellow City fans away by building up false hopes.
Anyway, my beef is threads and posts being deleted for no reason. This one has now been restored so all is well in the world again.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:08 pm
Forever Blue wrote:I THINK YOU WILL FIND Carl gets 49 out of 50 posts CORRECT, Please prove me wrong.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:08 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:The Lone Gunman wrote:croesybluebird wrote:I think anyone who takes what is written in the Echo as gospel truth is something of a fool.
I think anyone who takes what is written on internet message boards as gospel truth is definitely a fool.
Does that apply to your blog?
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:09 pm
Marc wrote:May'be you should practice what you preach.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:09 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:11 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:12 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:13 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:13 pm
nerd wrote:Carl has shown himself to be as reliable source as you'd get with regards to info about CCFC. Only things wrong I can think of were the Ridsdale resignation and potentially this. That's a pretty good record, and if he does occasionally receive duff info, so what? He's hardly posting things out of malice.
Yet it causes a thread railing about threads being deleted ( ignoring it's a message board, so "freedom of speech" hardly applies anyway... ), applauds the fact the thread was "re-instated". Pardon my ignorance, but I naively assumed threads once deleted are gone forever. Which would therefore mean the thread in question always existed and was never deleted.
Which makes me wonder why this thread was created.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:14 pm
nerd wrote:Pardon my ignorance, but I naively assumed threads once deleted are gone forever. Which would therefore mean the thread in question always existed and was never deleted.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:15 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:15 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:nerd wrote:Pardon my ignorance, but I naively assumed threads once deleted are gone forever. Which would therefore mean the thread in question always existed and was never deleted.
You evidently don't know how this and other message boards work. I do.
Deleted threads don't disappear forever unless the moderators so desire.
This thread was deleted from the board earlier today, but reinstated after I started whinging about it.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:16 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:16 pm
croesybluebird wrote:Dave, could you explain exactly what your issue is with Carl, for the sake of clarity, for those of us that don't know.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:18 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:20 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:croesybluebird wrote:Dave, could you explain exactly what your issue is with Carl, for the sake of clarity, for those of us that don't know.
There is no issue.
My issue is with posts and threads being deleted for no reason.
I also have an issue with moderators pretending they haven't deleted things when they have.
Anyway, enough of this shite. I'm off to watch the game on telly.
Have a good evening.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:21 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:24 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:38 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:43 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:nerd wrote:Pardon my ignorance, but I naively assumed threads once deleted are gone forever. Which would therefore mean the thread in question always existed and was never deleted.
You evidently don't know how this and other message boards work. I do.
Deleted threads don't disappear forever unless the moderators so desire.
This thread was deleted from the board earlier today, but reinstated after I started whinging about it.
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:45 pm
The Lone Gunman wrote:I notice your thread claiming you were first with the news of City making a bid to sign Steve Howard has been deleted following Steve Borley's comments in today's Echo. As has my suggestion that the story was nonsense and nothing more than a press invention. That's a bit naughty, isn't it?
Do all of your so-called exclusives get deleted when they are proved to have no basis in fact?
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:48 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:51 pm
Wed Jun 23, 2010 6:53 pm