Rolling Contract ?

so every july the club should give him 1 years notice just in case we want to get rid.

Sorry, read the thread again. Sorry for losing patience but come on ffs.

Here's it in Peter and Jane terms for those struggling to keep up:

Peter is playing football in the garden. Peter asks Jane how long can he play football for. Janes tells Peter that he cane play football for one whole year.
The next day Peter is playing football and he asks Jane how long can he play football for. Jane tells him he can play football for a whole year.
The following week, Peter is playing football again. He asks Jane how long can he play football for. Jane tells him he can play football for a whole year.
Two weeks and two days later, Peter is again playing football. He asks Jane how long can he play football for. Jane tells him he can play football for a whole year.

Peter then says to Jane "Jane, why do you always tell me I can play football for a whole year? No matter when I ask, the time doesn't get any shorter"
And Jane replies "That's because it a rolling contract you stupid cnut. As soon as I decide you can't play football anymore you will still have a year left to play. No matter when I decide you can't play anymore, you will have at least a year left. If I decide at 3am in the morning on a raining Wednesday, you'll still have a f*cking year's notice. f**k this, I'm off to play with Pat the dog".

The point your missing in your little story is.
If you wait until next July to give DJ notice he'll get 12 months pay from July 2011.
If you give him 12 months notice now, he'll work 12 months notice which ends in
July 2011.then in July 2011 the club would be in a position to either renegotiate his contract
Or let him go.
Got it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I remember a certain individual standing up against Ridsdale and then turning to the board for their support only to get rebuked. This was followed by months of abuse from quite a few fans against this individual. With all that is being revealed I wonder if those adveraries of this individual will be so cocky now. I doubt it.

Good point Baked and we could add that only 2 individuals, one of which is the same one you refer to, voted against the land deal.

We now know PMG simply paid themselves for that land and are already cashing in with a pub/KFC, when we were all led to believe at the time the deal was vital in paying off the HMRC.

How many more would have voted against if that truth had come out then?