BBC ASK CARDIFF CITY FANS ?

People keep saying it wasn't his team which is correct but it's also an excuse for the poor results he has had, Huddersfield weren't Warnock's players either but that didn't stop them winning & lifting themselves up the table.

I am in the 50/50 camp but he was employed to do the job of keeping us up & he did so added to the question of who else would come here I say give him a chance.

In all fairness, Huddersfield finished 3rd last year nearly thirty points ahead of us. Although some players were sold, they still had the core of a decent side, so Warnock didn't suddenly turn them into world beaters. He did though give them the belief that they could perform better than they had under their previous manager, which they duly did.

Neil Warnock actually did an amazing job once again and beat many top sides to stay up, finishing 4pts clear of Lamouchi with 3 less games in charge.

Huddersfield were 6pts from safety, Cardiff had a 6pt cushion.

Two of Huddersfield's best players were sold to Forest in the Prem for £10mill.

Huddersfield looked down and out, where as Cardiff were never in the bottom 3.

Warnock came in had 15 matches W7 D4 L4

9 of those 15 games were v Top 10 ten where he beat quite a few, Lamouchi never beat one top 10 ten team.

Huddersfield also never relied on Reading losing 6pts where as Cardiff did.
2nd from bottom and 6pts off safety


Reading minus 6pts

Wigan minus 3pts

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Hope he stays but talks need sorting double quick.

All I would say is this. McCarthy, Morrison and Hudson were all given the job based on a good run of a couple of games. But then once appointed full time things went down hill. Just because Sabri has had some
Good results does that mean he’s definitely the right person for the job. Personally I think he’s got the pedigree and experience of a championship manager and may be the best option out there at the moment. But I hope we’ve Learnt to look far and wide and take time to get the best manager long term, not based on a good couple of wins

People keep saying it wasn't his team which is correct but it's also an excuse for the poor results he has had, Huddersfield weren't Warnock's players either but that didn't stop them winning & lifting themselves up the table.

I am in the 50/50 camp but he was employed to do the job of keeping us up & he did so added to the question of who else would come here I say give him a chance.

In all fairness, Huddersfield finished 3rd last year nearly thirty points ahead of us. Although some players were sold, they still had the core of a decent side, so Warnock didn't suddenly turn them into world beaters. He did though give them the belief that they could perform better than they had under their previous manager, which they duly did.

Neil Warnock actually did an amazing job once again and beat many top sides to stay up, finishing 4pts clear of Lamouchi with 3 less games in charge.

Huddersfield were 6pts from safety, Cardiff had a 6pt cushion.

Two of Huddersfield's best players were sold to Forest in the Prem for £10mill.

Huddersfield looked down and out, where as Cardiff were never in the bottom 3.

Warnock came in had 15 matches W7 D4 L4

9 of those 15 games were v Top 10 ten where he beat quite a few, Lamouchi never beat one top 10 ten team.

Huddersfield also never relied on Reading losing 6pts where as Cardiff did.
2nd from bottom and 6pts off safety


Reading minus 6pts

Wigan minus 3pts

Although we will never know for sure, even with Warnock in charge of us do you believe we would have had enough ability to have beaten 9 of the top 10 teams. I don't, which strengthens my belief that Huddersfield were not as bad as their position indicated when he took over. Having said that I agree that Warnock would still have got more points on the board for us than Lamouchi.

For the record I think that Warnock is a fantastic manager and part of me still wishes he was still with us. Looking further ahead, I think we have to give Lamouchi a chance because we cannot put up with the managerial instability that's been so evident recently.

People keep saying it wasn't his team which is correct but it's also an excuse for the poor results he has had, Huddersfield weren't Warnock's players either but that didn't stop them winning & lifting themselves up the table.

I am in the 50/50 camp but he was employed to do the job of keeping us up & he did so added to the question of who else would come here I say give him a chance.

In all fairness, Huddersfield finished 3rd last year nearly thirty points ahead of us. Although some players were sold, they still had the core of a decent side, so Warnock didn't suddenly turn them into world beaters. He did though give them the belief that they could perform better than they had under their previous manager, which they duly did.

Neil Warnock actually did an amazing job once again and beat many top sides to stay up, finishing 4pts clear of Lamouchi with 3 less games in charge.

Huddersfield were 6pts from safety, Cardiff had a 6pt cushion.

Two of Huddersfield's best players were sold to Forest in the Prem for £10mill.

Huddersfield looked down and out, where as Cardiff were never in the bottom 3.

Warnock came in had 15 matches W7 D4 L4

9 of those 15 games were v Top 10 ten where he beat quite a few, Lamouchi never beat one top 10 ten team.

Huddersfield also never relied on Reading losing 6pts where as Cardiff did.
2nd from bottom and 6pts off safety


Reading minus 6pts

Wigan minus 3pts

Although we will never know for sure, even with Warnock in charge of us do you believe we would have had enough ability to have beaten 9 of the top 10 teams. I don't, which strengthens my belief that Huddersfield were not as bad as their position indicated when he took over. Having said that I agree that Warnock would still have got more points on the board for us than Lamouchi.

For the record I think that Warnock is a fantastic manager and part of me still wishes he was still with us. Looking further ahead, I think we have to give Lamouchi a chance because we cannot put up with the managerial instability that's been so evident recently.

I agree with virtually everything you’ve just stated

Which bit don't you agree with Annis?

Definitely keep him ….did a good job in keeping us up and let’s see who he gets in

Definitely keep him ….did a good job in keeping us up and let’s see who he gets in

Well if he does stay that will be the question on everyone's mind.

Which bit don't you agree with Annis?

Jules, Start answering my questions on other topics first before asking me questions.

We keep him unless we can get anyone better,as that is unlikely its a no brainer.

Agree .