Trump found guilty of falsifying business records

Whether you like trump or not ,how can you have a judge who campaigned on lock up trump it's bonkers,plus what he's convicted of anyone else it wouldn't even get to court,the judicial system in the US is being politicised which is a dangerous thing,all the left who are clapping their hands over this need to think carefully it could happen to them but political parisanship clouds peoples minds just to win it's dangerous

Whether you like trump or not ,how can you have a judge who campaigned on lock up trump it's bonkers,plus what he's convicted of anyone else it wouldn't even get to court,the judicial system in the US is being politicised which is a dangerous thing,all the left who are clapping their hands over this need to think carefully it could happen to them but political parisanship clouds peoples minds just to win it's dangerous

Agree , the basis of the case is that the 130k was put down on a tax return as a legal expense . That's it .hardly the crime of the century

Whether you like trump or not ,how can you have a judge who campaigned on lock up trump it's bonkers,plus what he's convicted of anyone else it wouldn't even get to court,the judicial system in the US is being politicised which is a dangerous thing,all the left who are clapping their hands over this need to think carefully it could happen to them but political parisanship clouds peoples minds just to win it's dangerous

Agree , the basis of the case is that the 130k was put down on a tax return as a legal expense . That's it .hardly the crime of the century

Coming from the man whose campaign logo was "Lock her up...!"?

And what about the other 33 charges not mentioned above...?

Whether you like trump or not ,how can you have a judge who campaigned on lock up trump it's bonkers,plus what he's convicted of anyone else it wouldn't even get to court,the judicial system in the US is being politicised which is a dangerous thing,all the left who are clapping their hands over this need to think carefully it could happen to them but political parisanship clouds peoples minds just to win it's dangerous

Agree , the basis of the case is that the 130k was put down on a tax return as a legal expense . That's it .hardly the crime of the century

Coming from the man whose campaign logo was "Lock her up...!"?

And what about the other 33 charges not mentioned above...?

2 cheeks of the same hypocritical arse. Clinton claimed Trump stole the election in 2016 then Trump did the same in 2020. If Trump gets in he’ll do everything he can to get Biden in court. Gets more like a Latin American banana republic by the day.

Whether you like trump or not ,how can you have a judge who campaigned on lock up trump it's bonkers,plus what he's convicted of anyone else it wouldn't even get to court,the judicial system in the US is being politicised which is a dangerous thing,all the left who are clapping their hands over this need to think carefully it could happen to them but political parisanship clouds peoples minds just to win it's dangerous

Agree , the basis of the case is that the 130k was put down on a tax return as a legal expense . That's it .hardly the crime of the century

Coming from the man whose campaign logo was "Lock her up...!"?

And what about the other 33 charges not mentioned above...?

The 33 are basically all the same tho

CNN Senior Legal Analyst Describes How The Trump Conviction Was A Political Hit Job

1. "The judge donated money... in plain violation of a rule prohibiting New York judges from making political donations—to a pro-Biden, anti-Trump political operation."

2. Alvin Bragg boasted on the campaign trail in an overwhelmingly Democrat county, “It is a fact that I have sued Trump over 100 times.”

3. "Most importantly, the DA’s charges against Trump push the outer boundaries of the law and due process."

4. "The charges against Trump are obscure, and nearly entirely unprecedented. In fact, no state prosecutor — in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere — has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything. None. Ever."

5. The DA inflated misdemeanors past the statute of limitations and "electroshocked them back to life" by alleging the falsification of business records was committed 'with intent to commit another crime.'

6. "Inexcusably, the DA refused to specify what those unlawful means actually were — and the judge declined to force them to pony up — until right before closing arguments. So much for the constitutional obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of trial."

7. "In these key respects, the charges against Trump aren’t just unusual. They’re bespoke, seemingly crafted individually for the former president and nobody else."

8. "The Manhattan DA’s employees reportedly have called this the “Zombie Case” because of various legal infirmities, including its bizarre charging mechanism. But it’s better characterized as the Frankenstein Case, cobbled together with ill-fitting parts into an ugly, awkward, but more-or-less functioning contraption that just might ultimately turn on its creator."

CNN Senior Legal Analyst Describes How The Trump Conviction Was A Political Hit Job

1. "The judge donated money... in plain violation of a rule prohibiting New York judges from making political donations—to a pro-Biden, anti-Trump political operation."

2. Alvin Bragg boasted on the campaign trail in an overwhelmingly Democrat county, “It is a fact that I have sued Trump over 100 times.”

3. "Most importantly, the DA’s charges against Trump push the outer boundaries of the law and due process."

4. "The charges against Trump are obscure, and nearly entirely unprecedented. In fact, no state prosecutor — in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere — has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything. None. Ever."

5. The DA inflated misdemeanors past the statute of limitations and "electroshocked them back to life" by alleging the falsification of business records was committed 'with intent to commit another crime.'

6. "Inexcusably, the DA refused to specify what those unlawful means actually were — and the judge declined to force them to pony up — until right before closing arguments. So much for the constitutional obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of trial."

7. "In these key respects, the charges against Trump aren’t just unusual. They’re bespoke, seemingly crafted individually for the former president and nobody else."

8. "The Manhattan DA’s employees reportedly have called this the “Zombie Case” because of various legal infirmities, including its bizarre charging mechanism. But it’s better characterized as the Frankenstein Case, cobbled together with ill-fitting parts into an ugly, awkward, but more-or-less functioning contraption that just might ultimately turn on its creator."

All this from the most Leftwing news channel Wow.

CNN Senior Legal Analyst Describes How The Trump Conviction Was A Political Hit Job

1. "The judge donated money... in plain violation of a rule prohibiting New York judges from making political donations—to a pro-Biden, anti-Trump political operation."

2. Alvin Bragg boasted on the campaign trail in an overwhelmingly Democrat county, “It is a fact that I have sued Trump over 100 times.”

3. "Most importantly, the DA’s charges against Trump push the outer boundaries of the law and due process."

4. "The charges against Trump are obscure, and nearly entirely unprecedented. In fact, no state prosecutor — in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere — has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything. None. Ever."

5. The DA inflated misdemeanors past the statute of limitations and "electroshocked them back to life" by alleging the falsification of business records was committed 'with intent to commit another crime.'

6. "Inexcusably, the DA refused to specify what those unlawful means actually were — and the judge declined to force them to pony up — until right before closing arguments. So much for the constitutional obligation to provide notice to the defendant of the accusations against him in advance of trial."

7. "In these key respects, the charges against Trump aren’t just unusual. They’re bespoke, seemingly crafted individually for the former president and nobody else."

8. "The Manhattan DA’s employees reportedly have called this the “Zombie Case” because of various legal infirmities, including its bizarre charging mechanism. But it’s better characterized as the Frankenstein Case, cobbled together with ill-fitting parts into an ugly, awkward, but more-or-less functioning contraption that just might ultimately turn on its creator."

All this from the most Leftwing news channel Wow.

Exactly

Donald Trump has said his historic trial and criminal conviction have been "very hard" for his wife, former First Lady Melania Trump.

Last week, jurors found Mr Trump guilty of falsifying business records to conceal hush-money payments made to former porn star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential election campaign.

With the verdict, he became the first US president to be convicted of a crime. He has repeatedly called the trial rigged and politically motivated.

In an interview with Fox News over the weekend, Mr Trump vowed that success at the upcoming November US election would be his "revenge".

He is slated to be sentenced on 11 July, and plans to appeal the convictions.

Speaking to Fox on Sunday, Mr Trump said his New York legal battle has been particularly difficult on his wife.

The trial included lurid details of the alleged meeting between Mr Trump and Ms Daniels.

The details included Mr Trump greeting her in silk pyjamas at his hotel suite, and Ms Daniels' claims that he did not wear protection when they allegedly had sex.

In her testimony, Ms Daniels also claimed that Mr Trump and his wife sleep in different beds.

"She's fine, but I think it's very hard for her," Mr Trump said of his wife, adding that "in many ways, it's tougher on them [his family] than it is me".

Under New York law, each of the 34 felony counts Mr Trump was convicted of could result in up to four years in prison - though this is not considered a likely outcome.