Hooligan

2Blue2Handle is doing a bit of backpedalling I notice

Good, i've just replied to him aswell.

in fairness, all he said was that he had no time for him. I really don't expect everybody to like me, never mind if I had a chequered past.
Annis has said himself it's all in the book anyway, if you're going to make money out of it and sell it as a hooligan book surely you can't have it both ways

No, it was the "Anus" comment that i was referring too.

really are a sad bunch on that site, full of cunts

http://www.cardiffcitystadium.co.uk/mb/ ... f=2&t=4957

I have No problem with it as ITS ALL IN SHATTERED DREAMS, I HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, HAVE YOU PETER RIDSDALE.

good for you mate, dont rise to it, people in glass houses springs to mind

ha ha ha

its gone now

actually I am gutted, cos i was just about to register an account on there and leave my own opinion on the spineless board and the c**t at the head of the sinking ship !!! !!! !!!

annis, you wear your heart on ya sleeve and that is something to be proud of.

Silly twats, so childish and pathetic and these are the people who are running our club

Dear Peter,

Save you a job I got ABH and Theft on my record

Yours Sincerely,

The Rhooster.

you thug

YOU JUST A THUG WITH MONEY
THUG WITH MONEY
YOU JUST A THUG WITH MONEY

Dear Peter,

Save you a job I got ABH and Theft on my record

Yours Sincerely,

The Rhooster.

you thug

all under the influence i might add Baz

I have had arguments with this WElsh dragon clown who started that thread...he is either Peter Ridsdale or someone working for the club...no doubt about it.

Sorry mate your wrong, his name is Richard Jenkins. Lives up in Milton Keynes and sits in Ninian Stand

I went on there earlier and was the 1st to back Annis up. Gutted i didnt see the replies really. I was in work so didnt get to see it. Now i look, its bloody dissapeared. I dont think PR likes Annis books or threads ! lol even if he didnt start it

Removed it.

That Welsh Dragon seems like a punk.

Hes a student but a bit of a gimp if you know what i mean. (a skinny little smartass)

probably best way to describe him but runs a fantastic free on line football management game

Hes a student but a bit of a gimp if you know what i mean. (a skinny little smartass)

probably best way to describe him but runs a fantastic free on line football management game

Cheers for his name
AND THE SUPPORT

Hes a student but a bit of a gimp if you know what i mean. (a skinny little smartass)

probably best way to describe him but runs a fantastic free on line football management game

Bloody students

Evening, to buck the trend of the "he has no balls" comments everyone throws around, I thought I'd come to you and post.

GG knows me, yet I haven't been a student for 3 years, so clearly he's been on the sparkling water.

I have had arguments with this WElsh dragon clown who started that thread...he is either Peter Ridsdale or someone working for the club...no doubt about it.

Corky, you can call me a clown if you like, I actually posted a big reply to you on that site after you asked me to, and you politely ignored it. Generally people indifferent to the Trust won't be won around by ignoring their questions, you only had to answer the couple, and they weren't unfair questions. But never mind!!

I couldn't work for the club, I'd not want to take a wage given the current state and therefore couldn't live off the job as much as I'd love to. If I were PR, I'm sure I'd have better things to do.

really are a sad bunch on that site, full of cunts

http://www.cardiffcitystadium.co.uk/mb/ ... f=2&t=4957

I have No problem with it as ITS ALL IN SHATTERED DREAMS, I HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, HAVE YOU PETER RIDSDALE.

To clarify, my post wanted to know why people would support Annis over the club. Not an unfair question? It was there to be answered, just happens some people who did answer it started trying to make it Annis vs PR - again not my initial point or question.

Also, in another post elsewhere I said I knew very little about Annis and simply quoted the top search result on google which was BBC calling him a hooligan. As you sell books on it, and BBC is reporting it, I don't think me quoting them was unreasonable either?

And to finally put the issue to rest, I think the future of our club is without PR at the helm, I've said many a time he'll go to become some behind a desk figure when the new owners finally move in (whoever they may be) and will leave after a month as most outgoing chairmen tend to do. What I have said, is I think removing PR now is a mistake. Minimum he should go in the Summer because just promoting someone from the existing board doesn't solve our money problems.

Anyway, I couldn't care less what people think, and whether they actually read my posts or assume I'm somehow pro PR all the way, but I do want to know the above question of whether Annis actually thinks posing the initial question and quoting BBC is unfair... because those of you who have come to the other site and posted seem to feel it is... I beg to differ. Maybe you'll reply, unlike Corky.

PS. Actually agree the 'Anus' posts were stupid, but then that wasn't me so I'm not apologising for others on that site. I would enjoy seeing them trying to say it to his/your face.

Welsh dragon - somebody asked you to provide evidence for your claim in the poll that :-

"The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

Is it still your assertion " being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police"?

I'd suggest next time you spout off on the internet you understand laws of libel and defamation...

Evening, to buck the trend of the "he has no balls" comments everyone throws around, I thought I'd come to you and post.

GG knows me, yet I haven't been a student for 3 years, so clearly he's been on the sparkling water.

I have had arguments with this WElsh dragon clown who started that thread...he is either Peter Ridsdale or someone working for the club...no doubt about it.

Corky, you can call me a clown if you like, I actually posted a big reply to you on that site after you asked me to, and you politely ignored it. Generally people indifferent to the Trust won't be won around by ignoring their questions, you only had to answer the couple, and they weren't unfair questions. But never mind!!

I couldn't work for the club, I'd not want to take a wage given the current state and therefore couldn't live off the job as much as I'd love to. If I were PR, I'm sure I'd have better things to do.

really are a sad bunch on that site, full of cunts

http://www.cardiffcitystadium.co.uk/mb/ ... f=2&t=4957

I have No problem with it as ITS ALL IN SHATTERED DREAMS, I HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, HAVE YOU PETER RIDSDALE.

To clarify, my post wanted to know why people would support Annis over the club. Not an unfair question? It was there to be answered, just happens some people who did answer it started trying to make it Annis vs PR - again not my initial point or question.

Also, in another post elsewhere I said I knew very little about Annis and simply quoted the top search result on google which was BBC calling him a hooligan. As you sell books on it, and BBC is reporting it, I don't think me quoting them was unreasonable either?

And to finally put the issue to rest, I think the future of our club is without PR at the helm, I've said many a time he'll go to become some behind a desk figure when the new owners finally move in (whoever they may be) and will leave after a month as most outgoing chairmen tend to do. What I have said, is I think removing PR now is a mistake. Minimum he should go in the Summer because just promoting someone from the existing board doesn't solve our money problems.

Anyway, I couldn't care less what people think, and whether they actually read my posts or assume I'm somehow pro PR all the way, but I do want to know the above question of whether Annis actually thinks posing the initial question and quoting BBC is unfair... because those of you who have come to the other site and posted seem to feel it is... I beg to differ. Maybe you'll reply, unlike Corky.

This march/demo isnt about supporting Annis, Annis is one of many people behind this demo and behind it for all the right reasons in their own opinions.


You have become obsessed with Annis and lost the aims of those behind the demo.

I might also add that rather than accept another City fans choice to demonstrate you have done nothing but slate them. I am one of the public faces organising the demo, someone you called violent Hooligans intent on trouble with the police if i remember rightly before your post was edited.Yet I havent got one Football conviction to my name and have time and time gaain publicised this as "Peaceful Protest"

Welsh dragon - somebody asked you to provide evidence for your claim in the poll that :-

"The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

Is it still your assertion " being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police"?

I'd suggest next time you spout off on the internet you understand laws of libel and defamation...

Only that the people on that site have laughed that the police were being involved and joked that they'd have their work cut out... clearly I say joked hopefully, as otherwise it's quite disturbing. Thats a different issue to the one I've posted about, and doesn't actually involve anyone here - unless you were the people posting said remarks over the weekend/end of last week? If not, it wasn't aimed at you simple as.

PS. The Rhooster - same applies to you. Not aimed at you unless it was you who posted said remarks?

Welsh dragon - somebody asked you to provide evidence for your claim in the poll that :-

"The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

Is it still your assertion " being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police"?

I'd suggest next time you spout off on the internet you understand laws of libel and defamation...

Only that the people on that site have laughed that the police were being involved and joked that they'd have their work cut out... clearly I say joked hopefully, as otherwise it's quite disturbing. Thats a different issue to the one I've posted about, and doesn't actually involve anyone here - unless you were the people posting said remarks over the weekend/end of last week? If not, it wasn't aimed at you simple as.

PS. The Rhooster - same applies to you. Not aimed at you unless it was you who posted said remarks?

utter crap im afraid Welshdragon, you posted a poll about the demo, and on that you said it was being the public faces organising it are known football Hooligans intent on trouble with the police.Be specific if you are singling certain people out.Unless your on some sort of agenda yourself??

Welsh dragon - somebody asked you to provide evidence for your claim in the poll that :-

"The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

Is it still your assertion " being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police"?

I'd suggest next time you spout off on the internet you understand laws of libel and defamation...

Only that the people on that site have laughed that the police were being involved and joked that they'd have their work cut out... clearly I say joked hopefully, as otherwise it's quite disturbing. Thats a different issue to the one I've posted about, and doesn't actually involve anyone here - unless you were the people posting said remarks over the weekend/end of last week? If not, it wasn't aimed at you simple as.

PS. The Rhooster - same applies to you. Not aimed at you unless it was you who posted said remarks?

utter crap im afraid Welshdragon, you posted a poll about the demo, and on that you said it was being the public faces organising it are known football Hooligans intent on trouble with the police.Be specific if you are singling certain people out.Unless your on some sort of agenda yourself??

Nope I said headed by known hooligan - see 1st post, and that there were people intent on trouble with the police - see 2nd post.

All I'd say is if those people mentioned in the 2nd post, weren't from here, you should be careful who is doing the advertising of this march because bar 1 decent poster they are the only people who have advertised it on that 'official' site, and they've made clear their own intentions. I'm not saying its you, I'm saying its not making your march look good when idiots are going round saying stuff like that. They may have been little kids, but the end result is the same in terms of how it looks.

Welsh Dragon your a complete and utter w@nker, saying certain people are intending on causing trouble in the march wich you were seriouse about on CCS MB.

Welsh Dragon your a complete and utter w@nker, saying certain people are intending on causing trouble in the march wich you were seriouse about on CCS MB.

Again, call me all the names under the sun, I'm saying people have joined that message board and made comments about trouble with the police linked to the march, which I replied to. No trouble - great. If you're not intending on causing any - my comments don't involve you in the slightest so I don't see your problem.

Welsh Dragon your a complete and utter w@nker, saying certain people are intending on causing trouble in the march wich you were seriouse about on CCS MB.

Again, call me all the names under the sun, I'm saying people have joined that message board and made comments about trouble with the police linked to the march, which I replied to. No trouble - great. If you're not intending on causing any - my comments don't involve you in the slightest so I don't see your problem.

your misseleading others, people might not go to the march because of your comments on "trouble"

Welsh Dragon your a complete and utter w@nker, saying certain people are intending on causing trouble in the march wich you were seriouse about on CCS MB.

Again, call me all the names under the sun, I'm saying people have joined that message board and made comments about trouble with the police linked to the march, which I replied to. No trouble - great. If you're not intending on causing any - my comments don't involve you in the slightest so I don't see your problem.

your misseleading others, people might not go to the march because of your comments on "trouble"

In which case, stop the idiots going round boasting they're going to start some. Whether they mean it or whether they're kids bigging themselves up.

Has anybody here got the advert that went into the papers about the protest, because from memory it says "peaceful protest". If anybody has got it, stick it up here for our friend to read and maybe he will then stop associating it with hooliganism. It has nothing at all to do with hooliganism. It is to do with making a protest to the board and shareholders at the financial missmanagement of our football club.

2Blue2Handle is doing a bit of backpedalling I notice

Good, i've just replied to him aswell.

in fairness, all he said was that he had no time for him. I really don't expect everybody to like me, never mind if I had a chequered past.
Annis has said himself it's all in the book anyway, if you're going to make money out of it and sell it as a hooligan book surely you can't have it both ways

No, it was the "Anus" comment that i was referring too.

Seen as this was brought to my attention I may as well reply.

I did not back pedal at all.
I dont know Annis but form people who do know him seem to think he is a decent guy including those who I go to games with who do know him. Personally I have no interest in him but then why would I? Just like I have little interest in speaking to a lot of people on message boards.

I dont know who made the "Anus" comment but it wasnt me anyway

If you had read my messages anyway you would know although I have no interest in going on the protest I have continually said I can understand why people are going on it.

IMO it wont solve any problems so I wont be going but the key point is that the vast majority who are going on the protest are doing so because they believe it can help the club. I have no problem with the protest or Annis so im not really quite sure what I was back pedalling on.

I think all the tit for tat that has come back and for is pretty petty, unhelpful myself
I also think its pretty sad its splitting the fans when it has no need too.

Thats life I guess but we all just have to hope whatever happens is for the good of the club.

Has anybody here got the advert that went into the papers about the protest, because from memory it says "peaceful protest". If anybody has got it, stick it up here for our friend to read and maybe he will then stop associating it with hooliganism. It has nothing at all to do with hooliganism. It is to do with making a protest to the board and shareholders at the financial missmanagement of our football club.

I've seen it. You have 1 decent poster on that other site promoting the march. As for the rest on there I say again:

"...people on that site have laughed that the police were being involved and joked that they'd have their work cut out... clearly I say joked hopefully, as otherwise it's quite disturbing. Thats a different issue to the one I've posted about, and doesn't actually involve anyone here - unless you were the people posting said remarks over the weekend/end of last week? If not, it wasn't aimed at you simple as."

I'm not anti-march, I'm not even anti-sack PR, I'm anti-sack PR right this second before we have finances in place.

WelshDragon
Link to people boasting about starting trouble? or are you just shit stirring again?
There wont be any trouble in a peaceful protest

Has anybody here got the advert that went into the papers about the protest, because from memory it says "peaceful protest". If anybody has got it, stick it up here for our friend to read and maybe he will then stop associating it with hooliganism. It has nothing at all to do with hooliganism. It is to do with making a protest to the board and shareholders at the financial missmanagement of our football club.

I've seen it. You have 1 decent poster on that other site promoting the march. As for the rest on there I say again:

"...people on that site have laughed that the police were being involved and joked that they'd have their work cut out... clearly I say joked hopefully, as otherwise it's quite disturbing. Thats a different issue to the one I've posted about, and doesn't actually involve anyone here - unless you were the people posting said remarks over the weekend/end of last week? If not, it wasn't aimed at you simple as."

I'm not anti-march, I'm not even anti-sack PR, I'm anti-sack PR right this second before we have finances in place.

Who are you calling "you" and on what site? what finances in place dont talk such bollox

I thought the kids were on CCSMB

Don't tell me we have to suffer with Welsh Dragon etc here now.

I'll go back and look for them seanmogs, but I'm not spending hours surfing back through threads for them. And I DO HOPE it goes peacefully, but we all know it only takes 1 and the media can spin it against the protest, so I'm simply pointing out you don't need people like that there.

Has anybody here got the advert that went into the papers about the protest, because from memory it says "peaceful protest". If anybody has got it, stick it up here for our friend to read and maybe he will then stop associating it with hooliganism. It has nothing at all to do with hooliganism. It is to do with making a protest to the board and shareholders at the financial missmanagement of our football club.

I've seen it. You have 1 decent poster on that other site promoting the march. As for the rest on there I say again:

"...people on that site have laughed that the police were being involved and joked that they'd have their work cut out... clearly I say joked hopefully, as otherwise it's quite disturbing. Thats a different issue to the one I've posted about, and doesn't actually involve anyone here - unless you were the people posting said remarks over the weekend/end of last week? If not, it wasn't aimed at you simple as."

I'm not anti-march, I'm not even anti-sack PR, I'm anti-sack PR right this second before we have finances in place.

Who are you calling "you" and on what site?

You was the protest in general, not specifically 'you' sorry.

The other site is the official MB.