Sat Sep 29, 2012 6:34 am
Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:06 am
TheHangedMan wrote:Anybody who has an OPEN MIND and looks at both sides of the story i.e. the official inquiry version and opposing evidence (such as the Explosive Evidence video) can only come to one conclusion.
There is no doubt in my mind that 9/11 was an inside job. I base this conclusion on many hours of research looking at both sides of the coin.
The twin towers were designed to withstand MULTIPLE plane hits.....not just one. This is not one experts opinion against another....it is a FACT.
The smoking gun in all of this is Building 47. There is no way in the world that an office fire can make a building such as Building 47 fall in on it's own footprint. If you look at the footage you must be able to see that the collapse was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
With all that said, I have learned one thing in life.....people will believe what they WANT to believe. And that's fine. We have the luxury of free will and nobody is right as nobody is wrong.
The best part of this particular video is the last 20 minutes or so when they speak to psychologists etc. Their comments give you an understanding into why, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, people still believe the "official version of events".
Essentially it boils down to " You can't handle the truth", and that is not an insult to disbelievers, it's just the way it is.
The following link is a 2 minute clip from the film "A Few Good Men" and sums it up perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2F4VcBmeo
Sun Sep 30, 2012 10:59 am
Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:03 am
Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:44 pm
Big Boss Man wrote:Where is the proof that the Twin Towers were designed to take a number of plane hits?
Designed? It's a f*cking theory.
How the f**k do you test that design?
Build some mock full scale Twin Towers and fly planes into them and see if the design holds up?
The Titanic was also designed not to sink and guess what........
Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:05 pm
Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:18 pm
Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:19 pm
Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:55 pm
Sun Sep 30, 2012 6:52 pm
Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:06 pm
Sun Sep 30, 2012 7:10 pm
TheHangedMan wrote:Anybody who has an OPEN MIND and looks at both sides of the story i.e. the official inquiry version and opposing evidence (such as the Explosive Evidence video) can only come to one conclusion.
There is no doubt in my mind that 9/11 was an inside job. I base this conclusion on many hours of research looking at both sides of the coin.
The twin towers were designed to withstand MULTIPLE plane hits.....not just one. This is not one experts opinion against another....it is a FACT.
The smoking gun in all of this is Building 47. There is no way in the world that an office fire can make a building such as Building 47 fall in on it's own footprint. If you look at the footage you must be able to see that the collapse was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
With all that said, I have learned one thing in life.....people will believe what they WANT to believe. And that's fine. We have the luxury of free will and nobody is right as nobody is wrong.
The best part of this particular video is the last 20 minutes or so when they speak to psychologists etc. Their comments give you an understanding into why, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, people still believe the "official version of events".
Essentially it boils down to " You can't handle the truth", and that is not an insult to disbelievers, it's just the way it is.
The following link is a 2 minute clip from the film "A Few Good Men" and sums it up perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2F4VcBmeo
Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:26 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:58 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:00 pm
Leighton James Dont Like uS wrote:Actually''] have a look at this.......http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI&feature=related
Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:04 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2012 5:39 pm
Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:25 pm
DaVyZz wrote:the people looking for the nukes were international advisors or whatever..
im sure that nucleur bombs have some sort of serial code or recognition on where it was built (country)
so finding bombs with american serial codes will only lead to questions about security.
sure enough they could of created dirty bombs with a uranium core but it wasnt needed.
they didnt need proof of wmd's..
all there aims in the country has been hit without it.
Mon Oct 01, 2012 8:59 pm
Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:56 am
taffyapple wrote:One of the plane highjackers passports was found a few blocks away from the
Twin-Towers. Apparently, it survived the explosion and was blown away unscathed
this was pretty fortunate for the FBI, because it gave them a lead that they surely
could not have expected to get
Fortunate that an explosion so hot it melted steel must have somehow blew this
passport scott free of any damage.
Fortunate that the High-jacker must have had it in his hand at the time of the explosion
Perhaps his very last thought on Earth were not for the Prophet, or God, or a bevy of eager
virgins...Nope, perhaps his last thoughts were... lets see if i look a tw*t in my passport photo
This is the most disgusting cover-up and conspiracy in the History of the World. The only real question
is to just how much of a cover-up there was, and why????
As for the American public? Stupid cunts will believe the Sun sets in the East... as long as they
hear it on Fox News
Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:55 am
Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:58 am
Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:05 am
TheHangedMan wrote:Anybody who has an OPEN MIND and looks at both sides of the story i.e. the official inquiry version and opposing evidence (such as the Explosive Evidence video) can only come to one conclusion.
There is no doubt in my mind that 9/11 was an inside job. I base this conclusion on many hours of research looking at both sides of the coin.
The twin towers were designed to withstand MULTIPLE plane hits.....not just one. This is not one experts opinion against another....it is a FACT.
The smoking gun in all of this is Building 47. There is no way in the world that an office fire can make a building such as Building 47 fall in on it's own footprint. If you look at the footage you must be able to see that the collapse was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
With all that said, I have learned one thing in life.....people will believe what they WANT to believe. And that's fine. We have the luxury of free will and nobody is right as nobody is wrong.
The best part of this particular video is the last 20 minutes or so when they speak to psychologists etc. Their comments give you an understanding into why, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, people still believe the "official version of events".
Essentially it boils down to " You can't handle the truth", and that is not an insult to disbelievers, it's just the way it is.
The following link is a 2 minute clip from the film "A Few Good Men" and sums it up perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2F4VcBmeo
Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:10 am
Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:13 am
No Smoking wrote:TheHangedMan wrote:Anybody who has an OPEN MIND and looks at both sides of the story i.e. the official inquiry version and opposing evidence (such as the Explosive Evidence video) can only come to one conclusion.
There is no doubt in my mind that 9/11 was an inside job. I base this conclusion on many hours of research looking at both sides of the coin.
The twin towers were designed to withstand MULTIPLE plane hits.....not just one. This is not one experts opinion against another....it is a FACT.
The smoking gun in all of this is Building 47. There is no way in the world that an office fire can make a building such as Building 47 fall in on it's own footprint. If you look at the footage you must be able to see that the collapse was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
With all that said, I have learned one thing in life.....people will believe what they WANT to believe. And that's fine. We have the luxury of free will and nobody is right as nobody is wrong.
The best part of this particular video is the last 20 minutes or so when they speak to psychologists etc. Their comments give you an understanding into why, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, people still believe the "official version of events".
Essentially it boils down to " You can't handle the truth", and that is not an insult to disbelievers, it's just the way it is.
The following link is a 2 minute clip from the film "A Few Good Men" and sums it up perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2F4VcBmeo
Absolute nonsense.
First of all it was building 7, not 47. And many of your quotes or sayings are straight from the propaganda like documentaries, you say you have spent hours researching both sides of the coin. Well I'll tell you that isn't even enough to scratch the surface.
I've researched it for years and read every page of the official report. You seem to have watched the documentaries and made your mind up.
I'm not going to bore you all with my findings from my research as I don't have the finger power or the desire to write a thousand page essay.
I will however tell you my opinion.
It was not an inside job, but neither is the official report accurate. It is my personal opinion that this attack was ALLOWED to take place. There were many benefits to that and was the pretext for a war which brought USA incredible financial gain aswell as the passing of legislation to move towards a CCTV state.
Attacks on its own people to gather support for war isn't a new thing with the USA. I direct you to "operation northwoods" document...
Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:49 am
SBF1 wrote:No Smoking wrote:TheHangedMan wrote:Anybody who has an OPEN MIND and looks at both sides of the story i.e. the official inquiry version and opposing evidence (such as the Explosive Evidence video) can only come to one conclusion.
There is no doubt in my mind that 9/11 was an inside job. I base this conclusion on many hours of research looking at both sides of the coin.
The twin towers were designed to withstand MULTIPLE plane hits.....not just one. This is not one experts opinion against another....it is a FACT.
The smoking gun in all of this is Building 47. There is no way in the world that an office fire can make a building such as Building 47 fall in on it's own footprint. If you look at the footage you must be able to see that the collapse was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
With all that said, I have learned one thing in life.....people will believe what they WANT to believe. And that's fine. We have the luxury of free will and nobody is right as nobody is wrong.
The best part of this particular video is the last 20 minutes or so when they speak to psychologists etc. Their comments give you an understanding into why, despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary, people still believe the "official version of events".
Essentially it boils down to " You can't handle the truth", and that is not an insult to disbelievers, it's just the way it is.
The following link is a 2 minute clip from the film "A Few Good Men" and sums it up perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5j2F4VcBmeo
Absolute nonsense.
First of all it was building 7, not 47. And many of your quotes or sayings are straight from the propaganda like documentaries, you say you have spent hours researching both sides of the coin. Well I'll tell you that isn't even enough to scratch the surface.
I've researched it for years and read every page of the official report. You seem to have watched the documentaries and made your mind up.
I'm not going to bore you all with my findings from my research as I don't have the finger power or the desire to write a thousand page essay.
I will however tell you my opinion.
It was not an inside job, but neither is the official report accurate. It is my personal opinion that this attack was ALLOWED to take place. There were many benefits to that and was the pretext for a war which brought USA incredible financial gain aswell as the passing of legislation to move towards a CCTV state.
Attacks on its own people to gather support for war isn't a new thing with the USA. I direct you to "operation northwoods" document...
Until you do, it will just seem like you talking bollocks again.
Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:13 pm
Big Boss Man wrote:Here is a question for the experts......
Where all the phone calls made by people on the planes to family members fake?
Or are the families lying about the calls?
Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:15 pm
No Smoking wrote:Absolute nonsense.
First of all it was building 7, not 47. And many of your quotes or sayings are straight from the propaganda like documentaries, you say you have spent hours researching both sides of the coin. Well I'll tell you that isn't even enough to scratch the surface.
I've researched it for years and read every page of the official report. You seem to have watched the documentaries and made your mind up.
I'm not going to bore you all with my findings from my research as I don't have the finger power or the desire to write a thousand page essay.
I will however tell you my opinion.
It was not an inside job, but neither is the official report accurate. It is my personal opinion that this attack was ALLOWED to take place. There were many benefits to that and was the pretext for a war which brought USA incredible financial gain aswell as the passing of legislation to move towards a CCTV state.
Attacks on its own people to gather support for war isn't a new thing with the USA. I direct you to "operation northwoods" document...
Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:27 pm
Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:35 pm
RFMH wrote: