I REALLY REALLY CANT UNDERSTAND THE STATEMENT

Think this is veering way off topic, tbh.

Keith, who suggested writing the anti-PMG statement, who was responsible for the wording and who decided to release it at the time it was released?

Prior to the drafting of the statement, was anybody from PMG met / were any meetings requested of them?

Ridders didn't con all the Muni, it was blantantly obvious that much of what he was spouting was bollocks and Since 62 picked up on many points.

The statement from the Trust was forwarded to all memebers, the meeting was advertised and I for one think it was a very clever statement raised at the correct time. To be honest I think it's lost on many who just can't seem to get personalities out of their tiny minds rather than the big picture, which is why much of what's been posted previous in this thread is complete and utter horse shit. Barring SInce 62 that is.

Last edited by Pug on Fri Mar 19, 2010 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

you suggested the trust was flipped by the riddler at that meeting ?


I think that was a backhanded swipe at the trust and rather daft as it was organised for all fans and iriddler conned people, he conned us all

Exactly and the Trust were also part of the people who were there and got conned FFS.

And before you go off on a tangent the original point was are those on the Trust Board able enough to take on someone like the Riddler. I have already explained why I believe they are not so its not backhanded swipe its a direct swipe but now in classic Sludge style you go off in all directions until the point gets lost.

sorry but you are incorrect

keith was not flipped by ridsdale in nay way at all

ask steve davies

Ridders didn't con all the Muni, it was blantantly obvious that much of what he was spouting was bollocks and Since 62 picked up on many points.

The statement from the Trust was forwarded to all memebers, the meeting was advertised and I for one think it was a very clever statement raised at the correct time. To be honest I think it's lost on many who just can't seem to get personalities out of their tiny minds rather than the big picture, which is why much of what's been posted previous in in this thread is complete and utter horse shit. Barring SInce 62 that is.

Two posts. Both attacking posters of this board. Hmmm.

Which statement are you referring about? The PMG one? Remind us of the "big picture", which seemingly you believe only you and other Trust members know. Educate us dullards, please....

Ridders didn't con all the Muni, it was blantantly obvious that much of what he was spouting was bollocks and Since 62 picked up on many points.

The statement from the Trust was forwarded to all memebers, the meeting was advertised and I for one think it was a very clever statement raised at the correct time. To be honest I think it's lost on many who just can't seem to get personalities out of their tiny minds rather than the big picture, which is why much of what's been posted previous in in this thread is complete and utter horse shit. Barring SInce 62 that is.

Two posts. Both attacking posters of this board. Hmmm.

Which statement are you referring about? The PMG one? Remind us of the "big picture", which seemingly you believe only you and other Trust members know. Educate us dullards, please....

The big picture is what's happening to our club. Attacking the personalties of people who give their time to try and influence for the positive these matters is utterly insane.

Ridders didn't con all the Muni, it was blantantly obvious that much of what he was spouting was bollocks and Since 62 picked up on many points.

The statement from the Trust was forwarded to all memebers, the meeting was advertised and I for one think it was a very clever statement raised at the correct time. To be honest I think it's lost on many who just can't seem to get personalities out of their tiny minds rather than the big picture, which is why much of what's been posted previous in in this thread is complete and utter horse shit. Barring SInce 62 that is.

Two posts. Both attacking posters of this board. Hmmm.

Which statement are you referring about? The PMG one? Remind us of the "big picture", which seemingly you believe only you and other Trust members know. Educate us dullards, please....

The big picture is what's happening to our club. Attacking the personalties of people who give their time to try and influence for the positive these matters is utterly insane.

We know what's happening to our club, thank you very much. That's been established.

Your last quote, by the way, equally applies to those on this board who organised a march.

Now, as regards TLG, with all due respect, I've read CCMB over the years, never posted there. The reason? TLG - who with delicious irony seems to be membership secretary of the trust - developed a well earned "internet reputation" of patronising and demeaning people posting.

If you want to imply he's somehow a victim of "bullying", he's by far the wrong person to use! If his personality is "attacked", then I'm sure you really mean "internet persona". Because if he speaks to people in the "real world" the way he's "spoken" to them online, I'm sure he's got good BUPA coverage!

So, if he is a different, dare I say nicer, person in the real world, that internet persona is thus false - a fake - not real. So why would he give a shit?

First up, I'm not on about Dave and I'm fully aware he's very able to defend any opinion he may make dogmatically or not. I'm on about Since 62 who has been slaughtered in this thread. I can't even be bothered to indicated how ludicrous this is (he can't deal at board level!!) and then on top if say he had the wool pulled over his eyes by Ridders at the muni, which he most certaintly didn't, which I can't say for other individuals!
As for the march whilst I didn't join it, I thought it went off well and was well organised. I just rather the route of the trust to make my feelings known.

Keith has been slaughtered? How?

There are lots of intelligent people who get "hoodwinked" by people like Ridsdale. That's hardly an insult - I don't believe Keith has necessarily been, others can have that belief if they want. As for not dealing at board level, who really knows? Don't know Keith well enough to comment on that.

I would say he's one of the very few involved with the trust I've any degree of confidence in, not that that means much either way.

I have a lot of time and Respect for Keith(Since 62), we may not agree on everything but he is def needed to stay on with the Trust.