Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:28 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:So they deserved to beat Swansea because their player didnt even hit the target?
Now how about Dyer, Michu, Ki and Hernandez forcing good saves from cech?
Really, give it up. You have backed a loser here, throw away the ticket
It was a chance though. No worse than hitting a shot at the keeper. Whats the shot count over the two legs then gumbo?
How is that the same? If he hit the target then he's showing the ability to take the chance presented, if he doesn't then he doesn't deserve to score. Swansea had the better chances tonight by far, could have been 3-0 up at half time. Tremmel wasn't forced into one save really.
Shot count or good chance count? Good chance count is about 7-4 to Swans. Not sure why you want to count Lampards 35 yard tricklers for though.
Oh I see you decide what counts and what doesn't? You were battered in the 1st leg. And tonight you must have watched a different game to me as you were never close to being 3 up and the half time whistle came at the right time as Chelsea were dominating. It's ok though I know your little wind up games so don't take you seriously.
Wonder how long you'll last this time before the dreaded button is pushed
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:33 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:So they deserved to beat Swansea because their player didnt even hit the target?
Now how about Dyer, Michu, Ki and Hernandez forcing good saves from cech?
Really, give it up. You have backed a loser here, throw away the ticket
It was a chance though. No worse than hitting a shot at the keeper. Whats the shot count over the two legs then gumbo?
How is that the same? If he hit the target then he's showing the ability to take the chance presented, if he doesn't then he doesn't deserve to score. Swansea had the better chances tonight by far, could have been 3-0 up at half time. Tremmel wasn't forced into one save really.
Shot count or good chance count? Good chance count is about 7-4 to Swans. Not sure why you want to count Lampards 35 yard tricklers for though.
U
Oh I see you decide what counts and what doesn't? You were battered in the 1st leg. And tonight you must have watched a different game to me as you were never close to being 3 up and the half time whistle came at the right time as Chelsea were dominating. It's ok though I know your little wind up games so don't take you seriously.
Wonder how long you'll last this time before the dreaded button is pushed
Cech was forced into a great save to deny Michu who usually buries them 1 on 1, routledge also had his gaol bound volley blocked from 5 yards out by the unknowing back of Gary Cahill saving a stranded cech, Hernandez was again put through 1 on 1 and cech pulled off a fine save. In this time Tremmel wasn't tested severely once.
These are facts, if you can't deal with them then that's not my problem. Well done Swansea.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:34 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:41 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:Didnt know the aim of the game was to keep the ball and shoot harmlessly - if only swans did that they may have won over two legs against the European Champions while knocking out the cup holders 3-1 away and find themselves on the verge of a major cup win and European football.... Oh hang on
Like I said, throw away the ticket - you've lost.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:44 pm
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Didnt know the aim of the game was to keep the ball and shoot harmlessly - if only swans did that they may have won over two legs against the European Champions while knocking out the cup holders 3-1 away and find themselves on the verge of a major cup win and European football.... Oh hang on
Like I said, throw away the ticket - you've lost.
Lost what? The aim of the game is to score goals which means you have to shoot. Not the swansea way i know. Seems you are desperate to get out of the nonsense hole you've dug yourself. You've won the tie so be happy, but to pretend you played better than Chelsea is laughable. But then you are a joke after all.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:50 pm
RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Didnt know the aim of the game was to keep the ball and shoot harmlessly - if only swans did that they may have won over two legs against the European Champions while knocking out the cup holders 3-1 away and find themselves on the verge of a major cup win and European football.... Oh hang on
Like I said, throw away the ticket - you've lost.
Lost what? The aim of the game is to score goals which means you have to shoot. Not the swansea way i know. Seems you are desperate to get out of the nonsense hole you've dug yourself. You've won the tie so be happy, but to pretend you played better than Chelsea is laughable. But then you are a joke after all.
Lost the plot by the sounds of it.
So if the aim of the game is to score goals and over the two legs not only did Swansea create the more clear cut chances but also scored 2 of them as opposed to none by Chelsea - I'm failing to see your point?
Everyone that saw the game without an agenda have said Swansea deserve the win (deserve meaning they played better). Chelsea couldn't score a single goal over the two games and never really looked like doing so. Swansea scored two and could have at least got another 3 tonight. Well done Swansea.
Time to throw away that ticket, you are having a mare here NQAT.
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:52 pm
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:53 pm
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:05 am
RoyalLamb wrote:Like I said, can you name any shots which actually threatened the Swansea goalkeeper? We have already established the 2 one one ones which were saved excellently and the 5 yard volley blocked not to mention the excellent save from the dyer shot at the end are owing for the top corner pushed out to safety.... (And not even mentioning the two goals they actually scored).
The only thing you have come back with is "Ba shot over the bar"
Look at the reviews, everyone says Swans deserve it, even the majority of the Cardiff fans on here. Now don't be bitter and throw away that ticket
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:06 am
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:09 am
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Like I said, can you name any shots which actually threatened the Swansea goalkeeper? We have already established the 2 one one ones which were saved excellently and the 5 yard volley blocked not to mention the excellent save from the dyer shot at the end are owing for the top corner pushed out to safety.... (And not even mentioning the two goals they actually scored).
The only thing you have come back with is "Ba shot over the bar"
Look at the reviews, everyone says Swans deserve it, even the majority of the Cardiff fans on here. Now don't be bitter and throw away that ticket
We've established nothing. You bleat on, then suddenly it becomes fact in your fantasy world. The whole tie was dominated by Chelsea who were extremely wasteful but gifted 2 goals. That then resulted in Swansea playing for the draw tonight. Funny thing is though I didn't see the first 20 mins and turned off after 60 mins. Succeeded in wasting your time though so seems you picked the wrong ticket
Oh but I have no doubt you're still talking shit and did see the 1st leg when you were battered. FACT
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:09 am
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:10 am
Carpe Diem wrote:Oh and forgot to say there's been a few of us posting under this name tonight, just keeping you hanging on as you can't ever walk away. Sucker
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:11 am
6 bysedd wrote:Feeble effort from Carpe Diem im afraid.Royal Lamb has him all tied up.Painful reading.
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:12 am
6 bysedd wrote:Feeble effort from Carpe Diem im afraid.Royal Lamb has him all tied up.Painful reading.
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:15 am
RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Oh and forgot to say there's been a few of us posting under this name tonight, just keeping you hanging on as you can't ever walk away. Sucker
Walk away? This is riveting
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:17 am
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:17 am
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Oh and forgot to say there's been a few of us posting under this name tonight, just keeping you hanging on as you can't ever walk away. Sucker
Walk away? This is riveting
Lighten up sucker, we were just playing. Just me now though. Wanna discuss anything worthwhile? Just caught the highlights on bbc1 but again missed most of the 1st half. Seems the highlight was the ball boy getting his just rewards
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:19 am
RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:Oh and forgot to say there's been a few of us posting under this name tonight, just keeping you hanging on as you can't ever walk away. Sucker
Walk away? This is riveting
Lighten up sucker, we were just playing. Just me now though. Wanna discuss anything worthwhile? Just caught the highlights on bbc1 but again missed most of the 1st half. Seems the highlight was the ball boy getting his just rewards
Lighten up? This is great, I like tying you in knots
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:20 am
RoyalLamb wrote:6 bysedd wrote:Feeble effort from Carpe Diem im afraid.Royal Lamb has him all tied up.Painful reading.
but there's "a few of them" don't you know
Like herding sheep
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:23 am
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:6 bysedd wrote:Feeble effort from Carpe Diem im afraid.Royal Lamb has him all tied up.Painful reading.
but there's "a few of them" don't you know
Like herding sheep
Say something negative about the Jacks and positive about us.
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:25 am
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Didnt know the aim of the game was to keep the ball and shoot harmlessly - if only swans did that they may have won over two legs against the European Champions while knocking out the cup holders 3-1 away and find themselves on the verge of a major cup win and European football.... Oh hang on
Like I said, throw away the ticket - you've lost.
Lost what? The aim of the game is to score goals which means you have to shoot. Not the swansea way i know. Seems you are desperate to get out of the nonsense hole you've dug yourself. You've won the tie so be happy, but to pretend you played better than Chelsea is laughable. But then you are a joke after all.
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:30 am
kidwelly jack wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Didnt know the aim of the game was to keep the ball and shoot harmlessly - if only swans did that they may have won over two legs against the European Champions while knocking out the cup holders 3-1 away and find themselves on the verge of a major cup win and European football.... Oh hang on
Like I said, throw away the ticket - you've lost.
Lost what? The aim of the game is to score goals which means you have to shoot. Not the swansea way i know. Seems you are desperate to get out of the nonsense hole you've dug yourself. You've won the tie so be happy, but to pretend you played better than Chelsea is laughable. But then you are a joke after all.
I think the joke is on you, swansea will go to wembley and tear bradford a new arsehole and bring the cup back to swansea, and be the first welsh club to qualify for europe through the english system.
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:31 am
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:33 am
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:33 am
RoyalLamb wrote:He cuts deep
I suppose Chelsea are the current holders of another proxy cup too, just smile
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:35 am
Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:He cuts deep
I suppose Chelsea are the current holders of another proxy cup too, just smile
No it's the champions league
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:36 am
kidwelly jack wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
What game were you watching just a bitter redbird
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:36 am
kidwelly jack wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
What game were you watching just a bitter redbird
Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:38 am
Carpe Diem wrote:kidwelly jack wrote:Carpe Diem wrote:RoyalLamb wrote:Aramore wrote:What credit do they deserve?
They sat back and defended for 180 minutes and scored two goals from two mistakes.
Exactly what palace tried to do to us last season.
Cech was forced into far more testing saves than Tremmel. Was Tremmel seriously tested? Cech I remember had to pull out at least 3 or 4 good saves. To say the sat back and defended would be incorrect.
Bullshit. The jacks offered nothing over 2 legs and got gifted 2 goals. Back from the game already roath?
What game were you watching just a bitter redbird
The 1st leg and about 40 mins of the 2nd. I've said well done for winning, just you were gifted it by 2 unforced indiviudal mistakes. Can't see why you can't admit it as you still go through dont panic