Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:54 pm

I cant go on the other site coz they wont allow my tittie avatar on there :lol:

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:56 pm

ihatealiens wrote:I cant go on the other site coz they wont allow my tittie avatar on there :lol:


Given the choice of that site or your av, I can fully appreciate your decision!! :lol:

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:57 pm

Welsh Dragon wrote:
ihatealiens wrote:I cant go on the other site coz they wont allow my tittie avatar on there :lol:


Given the choice of that site or your av, I can fully appreciate your decision!! :lol:

Owain keeps trying to remove it off here but I think he has now seen the error of his ways and enjoys the view as much as I do :ayatollah:

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:59 pm

ihatealiens wrote:
Welsh Dragon wrote:
ihatealiens wrote:I cant go on the other site coz they wont allow my tittie avatar on there :lol:


Given the choice of that site or your av, I can fully appreciate your decision!! :lol:

Owain keeps trying to remove it off here but I think he has now seen the error of his ways and enjoys the view as much as I do :ayatollah:


Its almost hypnotic. He's probably sat there about to delete it, but hypnotised by it.

You've found a new relaxation therapy I think!!

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:00 pm

I find it mad how a large group of people who support the same team are so different.

I honestly think that it's going to kick off between our own fans soon. :lol:

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:02 pm

NTB wrote:I find it mad how a large group of people who support the same team are so different.

I honestly think that it's going to kick off between our own fans soon. :lol:



If you mean the guy above .....go for it.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:02 pm

Welcome aboard anyway. As you can see we enjoy a good debate on here but any sniping or personal abuse is not tolerated. Enjoy your time on here it's quite addictive.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:02 pm

Welshdragon, so you're basically backtracking then?

YOU posted a poll on the official site which in the "arguments" for / against the march which was ridiculously biased against a march, contained two clear libels only one of which was removed by a spotty oik moderator who believed he was only there to remove swear words...

Then come here and say you really meant something else...

So, did you claim those publicising the march were looking for trouble, or did you mean some people posting on the internet were "bigging it up"?

And if you now mean the latter, sorry, that's a spurious excuse - YOU claimed those organising it were "well known hooligans". Or were you misinterpreted on that score too?

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:04 pm

which was removed by a spotty oik moderator who believed he was only there to remove swear words...


Im not spotty :?
I also move threads as well btw :)

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:06 pm

nerd wrote:Welshdragon, so you're basically backtracking then?

YOU posted a poll on the official site which in the "arguments" for / against the march which was ridiculously biased against a march, contained two clear libels only one of which was removed by a spotty oik moderator who believed he was only there to remove swear words...

Then come here and say you really meant something else...

So, did you claim those publicising the march were looking for trouble, or did you mean some people posting on the internet were "bigging it up"?

And if you now mean the latter, sorry, that's a spurious excuse - YOU claimed those organising it were "well known hooligans". Or were you misinterpreted on that score too?



Welsh Dragon has back tracked big time,he's found a new audience .

Take a look at his posts on the other site.

He says Hooligans plain and simple.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:07 pm

2b, you're multi-talented lol.

ianfens wrote:
NTB wrote:I find it mad how a large group of people who support the same team are so different.

I honestly think that it's going to kick off between our own fans soon. :lol:



If you mean the guy above .....go for it.


Go for it.

Ta ihatealiens (what have aliens done to you?!! wait, don't answer that!!), I did only come on here to point out I'm not abusing AA on the other site, and to also point out there's some fools mouthing off about the march and the police, who may not be associated with its organisation.

nerd wrote:Welshdragon, so you're basically backtracking then?

YOU posted a poll on the official site which in the "arguments" for / against the march which was ridiculously biased against a march, contained two clear libels only one of which was removed by a spotty oik moderator who believed he was only there to remove swear words...

Then come here and say you really meant something else...

So, did you claim those publicising the march were looking for trouble, or did you mean some people posting on the internet were "bigging it up"?

And if you now mean the latter, sorry, that's a spurious excuse - YOU claimed those organising it were "well known hooligans". Or were you misinterpreted on that score too?


Stop misquoting me, and I QUOTE:

"- The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

PUBLICISED, not led, not organised, not headed by, but PUBLICISED. As I say, you want to sort out the people "bigging up" the march and talking up trouble, as you put it.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:09 pm

ianfens wrote:

Welsh Dragon has back tracked big time,he's found a new audience .

Take a look at his posts on the other site.

He says Hooligans plain and simple.


Again, just for you:

"- The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

PUBLICISED, not led, not organised, not headed by, but PUBLICISED. As I say, you want to sort out the people "bigging up" the march and talking up trouble, as you put it.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:10 pm

So where has 1 person said that there will be trouble on this march then ?

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:10 pm

The fuckers keep abducting me against my will !!! ;) I need some sleep mun :lol: :ayatollah:

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:11 pm

GarethGardner wrote:So where has 1 person said that there will be trouble on this march then ?


In one of the numerous threads about exactly the same topic. If people on that site bothered to keep topics in threads, I'd have found it by now.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:11 pm

ihatealiens wrote:The fuckers keep abducting me against my will !!! ;) I need some sleep mun :lol: :ayatollah:


:shock: :shock:

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:12 pm

I cannot speak for anyone else on this board but I can speak for myself and personally I don't see it as Annis Vs. PR and the board.

Annis is just another fan that happens to be a bit more involved in the club than others. (Shareholder etc.)

I post on this forum, CCMB and if something on there takes my interest I also post on CCSMB.

I am going on the march but not because I am following Annis, I am going on the march because I have made my own mind up about what I want for my club.

All the people who think this march is about Annis vs PR and the board are very wrong and need to do some growing up.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:13 pm

Who's bigging up trouble on the march, which is what you seem to be alluding to, Welsh Dragon?

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:13 pm

Ben wrote:most kids and people used to go down because of our reputation, "cardiff we are the best, going off today" etc, football, terraces, kicking off its all about football, staurdays, beer, clothes etc

go watch the fecking rugby , or like them kids on that cardiff offical site, go back to supporting man utd and liverpool before our f.a cup final, leeds f.a cup game or even the play off final , wankers



That has to be one of the saddest posts I've ever read. You are quite sick in the head.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:15 pm

NTB wrote:I cannot speak for anyone else on this board but I can speak for myself and personally I don't see it as Annis Vs. PR and the board.

Annis is just another fan that happens to be a bit more involved in the club than others. (Shareholder etc.)

I post on this forum, CCMB and if something on there takes my interest I also post on CCSMB.

I am going on the march but not because I am following Annis, I am going on the march because I have made my own mind up about what I want for my club.

All the people who think this march is about Annis vs PR and the board are very wrong and need to do some growing up.


Exactly. I don't think people should assume those fans not going on the march have been brainwashed mind, after all more fans will go to support the team on matchday than attend the march. But this thread is merging two different topics - my AA post quoting BBC, and the march topic. I'll point out now they are different topics. :lol:

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:17 pm

Welsh Dragon wrote:
NTB wrote:I cannot speak for anyone else on this board but I can speak for myself and personally I don't see it as Annis Vs. PR and the board.

Annis is just another fan that happens to be a bit more involved in the club than others. (Shareholder etc.)

I post on this forum, CCMB and if something on there takes my interest I also post on CCSMB.

I am going on the march but not because I am following Annis, I am going on the march because I have made my own mind up about what I want for my club.

All the people who think this march is about Annis vs PR and the board are very wrong and need to do some growing up.


Exactly. I don't think people should assume those fans not going on the march have been brainwashed mind, after all more fans will go to support the team on matchday than attend the march. But this thread is merging two different topics - my AA post quoting BBC, and the march topic. I'll point out now they are different topics. :lol:

you also forgot about my avatar and those pesky aliens :lol:

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:18 pm

Welsh Dragon wrote:
NTB wrote:I cannot speak for anyone else on this board but I can speak for myself and personally I don't see it as Annis Vs. PR and the board.

Annis is just another fan that happens to be a bit more involved in the club than others. (Shareholder etc.)

I post on this forum, CCMB and if something on there takes my interest I also post on CCSMB.

I am going on the march but not because I am following Annis, I am going on the march because I have made my own mind up about what I want for my club.

All the people who think this march is about Annis vs PR and the board are very wrong and need to do some growing up.


Exactly. I don't think people should assume those fans not going on the march have been brainwashed mind, after all more fans will go to support the team on matchday than attend the march. But this thread is merging two different topics - my AA post quoting BBC, and the march topic. I'll point out now they are different topics. :lol:


100% CORRECT.

I have a number of friends and family who are season tickets holders and want Ridsdale out etc.. but none of them are attending the march for personal reasons such as the time they arrive at the match etc..

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:23 pm

Welsh Dragon wrote:Stop misquoting me, and I QUOTE:

"- The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

PUBLICISED, not led, not organised, not headed by, but PUBLICISED. As I say, you want to sort out the people "bigging up" the march and talking up trouble, as you put it.


You see, this is where I'm confused as to the problem - backtracking or a basic lack of English comprehension.

Are individuals commenting in an existing thread publicising the protest - no, they are commenting. Those organising the protest publicise it, pretty simple to understand really.

Given you also claimed it was being organised by "well known hooligans", there was zero ambiguity in your post, despite your claims to the contrary.

Now, since your now deleted claim that the march is organised by "well known hooligans", perhaps you could name every person involved in organising the march; we'd know them what with them being "well known hooligans", eh?

Let's face facts - you set up a ridiculously biased poll, using the veiled "hooligan" issue to sway the poll and then attempt to explain yourself here by citing posts on the internet. Posts that you can't seem to find.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:29 pm

Welsh Dragon wrote:
ianfens wrote:

Welsh Dragon has back tracked big time,he's found a new audience .

Take a look at his posts on the other site.

He says Hooligans plain and simple.


Again, just for you:

"- The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

PUBLICISED, not led, not organised, not headed by, but PUBLICISED. As I say, you want to sort out the people "bigging up" the march and talking up trouble, as you put it.


Welshdragon what was the full line under the publicised one before it was edited, care to share that with the board word for word or shall i remind you?? I still have it, forget the publicised line youve quoted here, what did you put under it and speak honestly word for word.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:31 pm

nerd wrote:
Welsh Dragon wrote:Stop misquoting me, and I QUOTE:

"- The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

PUBLICISED, not led, not organised, not headed by, but PUBLICISED. As I say, you want to sort out the people "bigging up" the march and talking up trouble, as you put it.


You see, this is where I'm confused as to the problem - backtracking or a basic lack of English comprehension.

Are individuals commenting in an existing thread publicising the protest - no, they are commenting. Those organising the protest publicise it, pretty simple to understand really.


Publicising means spreading the word, it doesn't mean organising. Those publicising are simply those posters "bigging it up" as you said.

And as I said in my 1st post to AA, I quoted the BBC calling him a hooligan, because I was asking a question and having never met the guy I can honestly say I googled him and quoted the 1st topic that came up about him off a recognisable source. It wasn't meant as a slur on him, just a quote to ask my question from. This again, had nothing to do with the poll, and only a slight relation to the march in general anyway.

If we still aren't on the same page nerd (not name calling honest, its your username!! lol) I don't think we will get there. I only really posted here so AA can see what I had said, rather than have people mouthing off what they 'think' I said. Oh, and to find out what aliens get up to, and be hypnotised by breasts. That about sums up the point of my arrival.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:35 pm

The Rhooster wrote:
Welsh Dragon wrote:
ianfens wrote:

Welsh Dragon has back tracked big time,he's found a new audience .

Take a look at his posts on the other site.

He says Hooligans plain and simple.


Again, just for you:

"- The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

PUBLICISED, not led, not organised, not headed by, but PUBLICISED. As I say, you want to sort out the people "bigging up" the march and talking up trouble, as you put it.


Welshdragon what was the full line under the publicised one before it was edited, care to share that with the board word for word or shall i remind you?? I still have it, forget the publicised line youve quoted here, what did you put under it and speak honestly word for word.


He's not biting Rhooster - go on share with us what he REALLY said!!

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:36 pm

Welsh Dragon wrote:
nerd wrote:
Welsh Dragon wrote:Stop misquoting me, and I QUOTE:

"- The protest is being publicised by people who seem more interested in causing trouble with the police constantly being mentioned (why if its a peaceful protest??)"

PUBLICISED, not led, not organised, not headed by, but PUBLICISED. As I say, you want to sort out the people "bigging up" the march and talking up trouble, as you put it.


You see, this is where I'm confused as to the problem - backtracking or a basic lack of English comprehension.

Are individuals commenting in an existing thread publicising the protest - no, they are commenting. Those organising the protest publicise it, pretty simple to understand really.


Publicising means spreading the word, it doesn't mean organising. Those publicising are simply those posters "bigging it up" as you said.


So anybody commenting on it is thus "publicising" it?

Right, so say "The Rhooster" posts a thread on official site stating when the march is, aims et al. THAT is publicising the march. You're trying to lump anybody who replies to a thread into that same category, which is a weak explanation, especially given other "reasons" in that post of yours. Say person XXX replies to Rhooster saying "yeah, should be fun whacking a copper... :p" - is that am joke comment or publicising "having a go at the police" in your book?

The fact remains, you still can't explain the "well known hooligans" organising the march comment, taken in combination with the publicising comment, it's pretty clear you wanted to damn the march by associating it with hooliganism.

I appreciate your zeal for the current regime, but your goal failed fairly spectacularly. Rhooster, for example, would have had a pretty good claim against you for defamation if it had not been editted...

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:41 pm

machen_blue wrote:
He's not biting Rhooster - go on share with us what he REALLY said!!


From memory, as message obviously editted. Indeed, welsh dragon can breath safely, thread now deleted, but paraphrasing, it was

- organised by well known hooligans (* can't recall rest, but referred to AA too. *)

Which not only showed a spectacular lack of knowledge as to who was involved in the organisation of the march, but also highly defamatory.

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:46 pm

nerd wrote:
machen_blue wrote:
He's not biting Rhooster - go on share with us what he REALLY said!!


From memory, as message obviously editted. Indeed, welsh dragon can breath safely, thread now deleted, but paraphrasing, it was

- organised by well known hooligans (* can't recall rest, but referred to AA too. *)

Which not only showed a spectacular lack of knowledge as to who was involved in the organisation of the march, but also highly defamatory.


I think they are all spotty arsed geeks over there to be honest. My guess is that the now infamous Welsh Dragon is still in school and definitely appears to be crapping himself - he is even praising Feeney over there now, Annis has created a monster lol

Welshdragon, I admire how fast you have gone backwards it really is like Usain Bolt in reverse but in fairness to Annis I am sure he has heard far worse about him - the Argus recently said he was from Newport ffs so I am sure the kids insults wont touch him - so dont waste your delicate typing fingers eh, you may need them to pick your nose when teacher isnt looking!!

Re: Hooligan

Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:47 pm

nerd wrote:
machen_blue wrote:
He's not biting Rhooster - go on share with us what he REALLY said!!


From memory, as message obviously editted. Indeed, welsh dragon can breath safely, thread now deleted, but paraphrasing, it was

- organised by well known hooligans (* can't recall rest, but referred to AA too. *)

Which not only showed a spectacular lack of knowledge as to who was involved in the organisation of the march, but also highly defamatory.


He called the public faces of the demo known violent hooligans.
Bit different to his statement above.