Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:04 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:26 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:32 am
2blue2handle wrote:Of course this would be a risk but if he was fully fit we would have no chance, when at his best he is IMO one of the best CBs in world football. Even running ST 50% he would be by far the best in the champ.
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:05 am
bluebirds23 wrote:carl i could kiss you![]()
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:06 am
typenamehere wrote:bluebirds23 wrote:carl i could kiss you![]()
Back of the line kid![]()
![]()
EDIT: Because i know you'll read this, Milly too
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:07 am
milly44 wrote:typenamehere wrote:bluebirds23 wrote:carl i could kiss you![]()
Back of the line kid![]()
![]()
EDIT: Because i know you'll read this, Milly too
![]()
what have i done now
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:09 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:20 am
piledriver64 wrote:Bowmonster wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sorry to upset you All, But I feel we cant afford to have another unfit/injury prone player, PLEASE DONT ATTACK ME
Totally agree Annis, Another Fowler scenario me thinks
I can certainly understand those concerns but in my opinion, this is a risk worth taking.
Riggott was a risk but worth it because he is a good player, Woodgate is worth it because he is a great player. If he can stay fit (a big if I know) then he is as good as any centre back in Britain, and I include Ferdinand, Terry, etc. He is a Rolls Royce of a player.
Am I right in thinking that as this isn't a season long loan we can send him back if he gets injuredIf so the risk is even less.
In the last two games McNaughton and Hudson have been excellent so we have a back-up pairing and then we have Blake and Gypes to call on if we get desperate through injuries/suspensions.
Bellamy has a chronic injury but most of us would believe that he was worth the risk, I think Woodgate could be even more important to us if he could give us 10-15 games in the run in.
The eternal optimist in me would point to the prospect of a centre back possible partnership of Riggott and Woodgate for that important March/April/May time![]()
Not many would bet against us getting an auto spot if that could happen
![]()
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:22 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:30 am
piledriver64 wrote:Bowmonster wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Sorry to upset you All, But I feel we cant afford to have another unfit/injury prone player, PLEASE DONT ATTACK ME
Totally agree Annis, Another Fowler scenario me thinks
I can certainly understand those concerns but in my opinion, this is a risk worth taking.
Riggott was a risk but worth it because he is a good player, Woodgate is worth it because he is a great player. If he can stay fit (a big if I know) then he is as good as any centre back in Britain, and I include Ferdinand, Terry, etc. He is a Rolls Royce of a player.
Am I right in thinking that as this isn't a season long loan we can send him back if he gets injuredIf so the risk is even less.
In the last two games McNaughton and Hudson have been excellent so we have a back-up pairing and then we have Blake and Gypes to call on if we get desperate through injuries/suspensions.
Bellamy has a chronic injury but most of us would believe that he was worth the risk, I think Woodgate could be even more important to us if he could give us 10-15 games in the run in.
The eternal optimist in me would point to the prospect of a centre back possible partnership of Riggott and Woodgate for that important March/April/May time![]()
Not many would bet against us getting an auto spot if that could happen
![]()
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:42 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:33 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 9:26 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 9:28 am
carlccfc wrote:bluebirds23 wrote:carl i could kiss you![]()
Let's get him in first
Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:31 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:05 am
Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:06 am
beddau blue wrote:SORRY will not happen daniel levy wants woodgate to go to a premiership club with a view to selling him
very good source![]()
![]()
Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:34 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Sorry to upset you All, But I feel we cant afford to have another unfit/injury prone player, PLEASE DONT ATTACK ME
Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:35 pm
ccfc1983 wrote:Woodgate & Riggott will be best mates by the end of this season, after all, they'll have plenty of time to talk to each other on the physio table!!
Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:43 pm
Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:54 pm
The Premier 1 wrote:ccfc1983 wrote:Woodgate & Riggott will be best mates by the end of this season, after all, they'll have plenty of time to talk to each other on the physio table!!
riggott has been released if im not mistaken
Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:03 pm
Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:09 pm
Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:26 pm
Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:29 pm
let's just get on with winning promotion instead of being a nursing home to the crippled high profile names.
Havent we been here before?
by HarryParsnip ยป Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:03 pm
Havent we been here before :-
So far weve had the Andy O'Brien - has signed - insider scoop - turned out to not true.
Then we had the Vaughan - correct me if I'm wrong but that was also not true, also from an inide source
Now we have the Woodgate insider scoop........
For starters - he seems to be injury prone - do we really want another Riggot ?
What we do want is someone who stays fit and who can also do a job for us. If you dont have that , then there's not much to shout about.
Still it's all good fun I suppose, plus the club know they can put out some mis information and they know full well that certain posters here - and on the other board - will blab it for all to listen and believe.
Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:49 pm
Blue_Lloyd wrote:beddau blue wrote:SORRY will not happen daniel levy wants woodgate to go to a premiership club with a view to selling him
very good source![]()
![]()
Who is the source?
Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:53 pm
Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:16 pm
Merlin wrote:I thought Woodgate went to that American expert surgeon Steadman?
Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:34 pm
Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:12 pm
carlccfc wrote:I am told Jonathan Woodgate, through his friendship with Craig Bellamy, is close to signing for City.
There have been talks and it is now down to how the wages are to be paid, percentages etc.
Not quite a done deal but we are close.