A forum for all things Cardiff City
Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:22 pm
Has been charged with assaulting a woman.
He's innocent until proven guilty, of course. But if he were to be proven guilty, do you think Liverpool will handle this in the same manner as we did with Kevin Saint Luce?
I personally don't think so. Regardless of who the individual is, any man that's been sentenced for hitting a woman doesn't deserve a contract with any club, let alone a club with Liverpool's reputation IMO. However, I can't see Liverpool terminating the contract of a player that's seen as a future England star...
But anyways, he's innocent for now
Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:26 pm
The thing is if they got rid of him, another club would just sign him up. If he's still going to earn that kind of money after doing that it had might as well be there.
Fri Feb 01, 2013 10:59 pm
Any club with a player of sterling's potential will keep him.
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:26 pm
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:33 pm
Maybe all this money at such a young age is getting to him. You never know.
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:40 pm
Raheems victim received "slight facial injuries".
Where as St. Luce threw a massive punch at his victim. One you would throw at a man to knock him out.
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:41 pm
The woman whos charged him most likely realise hes young and is making loads of money. Making it up most prob.
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:43 pm
DandoCCFC wrote:The woman whos charged him most likely realise hes young and is making loads of money. Making it up most prob.
That's a bit of an accusation
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:43 pm
Not really.. 20 people claim they have been raped by Ched Evans. Just a chance to earn money and crave attention.
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:46 pm
I've never heard of 20 people claiming to be raped by him.
But you can't just say that every woman who's accusing a footballer of assault is lying to get a pay off
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:49 pm
I don't mean everyone but some do imo. The actual figure was 8 for Ched Evans.. all on the same night of the original lass.
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:50 pm
Well there's a difference between obviously spurious claims and someone who's allegedly had facial injuries as a result of it.
Fri Feb 01, 2013 11:51 pm
True. Ent going to argue about it just feel like some are being honest and some are not.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.