Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:37 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:41 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:41 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:45 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:53 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:01 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:02 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:05 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:we would not be wound up straight away HMRC will have to appoint an administrator, we would still be in the playoffs and if we get promoted our points deduction would start next year, we have way too much collateral to be wound up
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:07 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:10 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:12 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:15 pm
carlccfc wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:we would not be wound up straight away HMRC will have to appoint an administrator, we would still be in the playoffs and if we get promoted our points deduction would start next year, we have way too much collateral to be wound up
Baz the Judge made it quite clear it, the club would be liquidated.
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:19 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/compulsoryliquidation/whatiscompulsoryliquidation.htm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:20 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:20 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:22 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:carlccfc wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:we would not be wound up straight away HMRC will have to appoint an administrator, we would still be in the playoffs and if we get promoted our points deduction would start next year, we have way too much collateral to be wound up
Baz the Judge made it quite clear it, the club would be liquidated.
We really need Since 62 to explain the process, but I suppose even though we would be a solvent liquidation (we have more assets than debts we just can't pay our bills as and when they fall) the club would have to stop trading (i.e. playing) from the 5 May if we were put into liquidation.
BTW We are due prize money from finishing 4th in the Championship, does anyone know how much we get?
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:27 pm
NJ73 wrote:Usually in this situation I believe any league prize money is withheld from the club if it owes money to other clubs.
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:28 pm
Bartlett_bluebird wrote:Are we do add ons from Rogers transfer to Brum ?
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:29 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:NJ73 wrote:Usually in this situation I believe any league prize money is withheld from the club if it owes money to other clubs.
We owe money to the taxman not other football clubs.
Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:34 pm
NJ73 wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:NJ73 wrote:Usually in this situation I believe any league prize money is withheld from the club if it owes money to other clubs.
We owe money to the taxman not other football clubs.
Almost certainly Charlton will still be owed money fro the Hudson transfer for starters as it's rare for teams to pay the full amount up front. There's probably others too I 'd have though
Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:04 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:09 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:11 pm
Merlin wrote:dont know what all the fuss is about - TG just rang me - and told me this weekend - there will be good news, and the tax bill has already reached a payment scheme to cover the debts.
Its all gravy!
POSITIVITY! (wheres Blazing when you need some backup!)
Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:25 pm
Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:21 pm
davids wrote:AAAAAAARRRRGGGHHHHH !!!
This whole situation is driving me nuts!
Do we have any idea why this deal is now at a "delicate" stage? What is the hold up?
Is Ridsdale the problem or are there other difficulties to be overcome? Can we take comfort from Merlin's email?
How many questions can I ask in one post?
BOLLOCKS ! I just want this sorted NOW !
I wonder if our excellent form has actually been a hindrance to the takeover? Is the fact that the club within touching distance of the Premier League making the takeover more difficult?
If I had much hair left I would be tearing it out by now !
Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:23 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Merlin wrote:dont know what all the fuss is about - TG just rang me - and told me this weekend - there will be good news, and the tax bill has already reached a payment scheme to cover the debts.
Its all gravy!
POSITIVITY! (wheres Blazing when you need some backup!)
Wed Apr 28, 2010 9:32 pm
Thu Apr 29, 2010 12:40 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:carlccfc wrote:bluebirdbaz wrote:we would not be wound up straight away HMRC will have to appoint an administrator, we would still be in the playoffs and if we get promoted our points deduction would start next year, we have way too much collateral to be wound up
Baz the Judge made it quite clear it, the club would be liquidated.
We really need Since 62 to explain the process, but I suppose even though we would be a solvent liquidation (we have more assets than debts we just can't pay our bills as and when they fall) the club would have to stop trading (i.e. playing) from the 5 May if we were put into liquidation.
BTW We are due prize money from finishing 4th in the Championship, does anyone know how much we get?
Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:36 pm
We really need Since 62 to explain the process, but I suppose even though we would be a solvent liquidation (we have more assets than debts we just can't pay our bills as and when they fall) the club would have to stop trading (i.e. playing) from the 5 May if we were put into liquidation.
BTW We are due prize money from finishing 4th in the Championship, does anyone know how much we get?
I`ll try.
Basically , if the debt has not been paid in full or HMRC do not confirm to the judge at or before the hearing on 5 May that they have withdrawn their winding up petition , the the judge will grant the winding up order and put the company (i.e. the club) immediately into compulsory liquidation.
That would be a total disaster for the club as all player contracts would become the property of the League rather than the club and the club would cease to trade and exist. The exception would be if someone came in soon after the event and paid off all the debts in full (with interest) - but they would still have to pursuade the League that the player assets could then be transferred back to the club. This exception is almost certainly not going to happen - if someone was willing/able to pay off all the debts in full , they would have done so before now.
As you say , there is still the option of going for the lesser evil of Administration. Again , because of the club`s track record of broken promises , a judge would take a hell of a lot of persuading to grant such an order as promises of "jam tomorrow" have already been made and broken to HMRC and other creditors.From my direct experience of this , it would almost certainly take evidence such as proof of major funds lodged by the new investors legally pledged to pay towards the debt to convince the judge.
I really think that this takeover/deal with HMRC and other major creditors has to be concluded and confirmed in writing before the court hearing next week to avoid a last minute rush into Administration (at best). The Malaysians know this , and they also know that the current owners and major creditors know it and that they can`t afford the risk of losing everything in an Administration or liquidation. I suspect that is why the negotiations are ongoing and smack a bit of brinksmanship as the potential new investors seem to hold most of the cards.
As the court hearing is before the play-offs there is not even the option for the current owners to gamble (and it is a hell of a risky gamble) of success and promotion as an alternative to a sale without them putting very substantial sums of money into the pot themselves (several millions on top of paying ongoing wage and other running costs) .
I stick to my view , stated on here and elsewhere , that they will acquire all the shares and settle all the liabilities for a total figure of no more than £20m.A good deal for them , and the only realistic one in town for the current stakeholders in the club.
Your comment about the club being "solvent" on the basis of having more assets than liabilities is interesting , but it doesn`t actually work in practice.Firstly , that "surplus" would only be arithmetically correct if the value of the stadium was artificially inflated in the clubs books from its actual cost to the club of about £23m to a figure more like £60m. There is no real basis for such a big upward valuation that would be accepted by auditors in the absence of the support of an independent profesional valuation at such a figure (which I understand the club has been unable to obtain).Secondly , to be able to do a solvent liquidation ,the club would have to prove that it has either paid all its debts in full or will do so without fail within 12 months.That`s why solvent liquidations are only normally used to wind up companies that have finished the purpose for which they were set up (e.g. a company set up to construct a building site which is now finished,or one to organise the London Marathon or another event).
Hope this helps
Keith
LOOK INTO MY EYES THINK POSITIVE ALL WILL BE FINE - PREMIERSHIP HERE WE COME!!