Fri May 21, 2010 8:03 pm
Fri May 21, 2010 8:05 pm
Fri May 21, 2010 8:09 pm
nerd wrote:If Langston were granted the summary judgement, that would have killed the club?
Fri May 21, 2010 8:11 pm
carlccfc wrote:In a few minutes time Peter Ridsdale will talk on the BBC and claim to have taken a club on with debts of £35million and has constantly told us the debt is Langton.
Well the debt was £24million to LANGSTON and despite what Ridsdale says there has never been a single payment to Langston since Sam was forced out.
Langston have never threatened to take the club under and never took it to the brink of Extinction.
Creditors of the club never demanded monies from Sam Hammam whilst he was in charge of the club either.
Langston actually negotiated their sum down by £14 million to £10million to HELP THE CLUB NOT RUIN IT.
Now lets look at Ridsdale, the clubs debt has actually risen under his tenure yet the biggest debt when he came on board has decreased.
Creditors will not deal with him and lost all confidence in him.
He has never made personnal sacrifices for the good of the club, only for the good of Peter Ridsdale.
Peter Ridsdale is solely responsible for lying to us fans, to the clubs suppliers, it's creditors and even his own directors.
So who do you believe ?
Without a doubt IT IS SAM WHO HAS TOLD THE TRUTH BUT HAS REMAINED IN SILENCE FOR THE GOOD OF THE CLUB AND IN DUE COURSE I AM SURE HE WILL SPEAK OUT.
Fri May 21, 2010 8:14 pm
Fri May 21, 2010 8:14 pm
Fri May 21, 2010 8:17 pm
Fri May 21, 2010 8:25 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Steve, But its getting to Me, Carl etc how THE RIDDLER STILL KEEPS SPREADING LIES and SPIN
Fri May 21, 2010 8:48 pm
nerd wrote:If Langston were granted the summary judgement, that would have killed the club?
Fri May 21, 2010 10:05 pm
Fri May 21, 2010 10:07 pm
Sat May 22, 2010 6:27 am